Posted on 07/02/2010 8:55:38 AM PDT by OneVike
Thanks for the ping!
heads up ping
bttt
The attacks on the US have always been on targets already despised by the left and the media: commerce and the military. That’s why the left and the media keep giving Islam a pass....the moment they slip up and hit a group that is not despised by the media and the left, like a shopping center or a subway or a sports crowd, we will be united in our revenge. But for now Islam is cunning in hitting Ft. Hood and the towers of commerce because they know their acts will be ignored (virtually) by the press the white house and the educational institutions.
IOW, it's not the nature of the evidence, but the seriousness of the charge that must be taken into account?
I seem to remember discarded Speaker Tom Foley saying this about George H.W. Bush's alleged SR-71 flight to Spain to negotiate release of the Iranian hostages for Reagan.
Lord, protect us.
Maybe we should build more mosques...to keep them happy.s~
How would we react?
The Left loves college campuses but when a muzzie drives his SUV over half a dozen students at the University of North Carolina we hardly heard a peep about it.
Most Americans don’t know that the Trolley Square Mall shooting was Jihad. Even today Wiki could barely bring itself to report the Mohammedan connection to that bit of history.
gnip
wow, is there a website that goes with the pic? I’m from Midland Tx and can tell u there are more illegals than u can shake a stick at. Always has been, now the terrorists r in the mix as well.
Don’t recall where the photo was posted originally, but you might try google, which has several articles about “Special Interest Aliens.”
Re post 6, I don’t quite follow what you are getting at there. All I know is that unless one presents his message in good form, people tend to ignore it as the scribblings of an ignoramus.
“I dont quite follow what you are getting at there”
Perhaps I was checking your pulse for a sense of humor. Thanks for the confirmation.
By your context, "just skimming" would have been more appropriate --
but on the other hand, one online dictionary has conflicting definitions for scan:
1. to glance at or over or read hastily: to scan a page.
2. to examine the particulars or points of minutely; scrutinize.
3. to peer out at or observe repeatedly or sweepingly, as a large expanse; survey.
4. to analyze (verse) as to its prosodic or metrical structure; read or recite (verse) so as to indicate or test the metrical form.
5. to read (data) for use by a computer or computerized device, esp. using an optical scanner.
6. Television . to traverse (a surface) with a beam of light or electrons in order to reproduce or transmit a picture.
7. Radar . to traverse (a region) with a beam from a radar transmitter.
8. Medicine/Medical, Biology . to examine (a body, organ, tissue, or other biologically active material) with a scanner.
Cheers!
LOL.
Thanks for the map. I believe I have seen it before, but I will keep it for reference purposes.
Personally I thought his message was spot on and I was not at all bothered by a few errors in his grammar. I have read many of this guys articles and usually he has very well written columns. Maybe you should read more of his work before you begin calling him an ignoramus.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.