Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass Legislature approves plan to bypass Electoral College
Boston.Com ^ | 27 July 2010 | Martin Finucane

Posted on 07/27/2010 2:40:29 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi

The Massachusetts Legislature has approved a new law intended to bypass the Electoral College system and ensure that the winner of the presidential election is determined by the national popular vote.

"What we are submitting is the idea that the president should be selected by the majority of people in the United States of America," Senator James B. Eldridge, an Acton Democrat, said before the Senate voted to enact the bill.

Under the new bill, he said, "Every vote will be of the same weight across the country."

But Senate minority leader Richard Tisei said the state was meddling with a system that was "tried and true" since the founding of the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: elections; electoral; electoralcollege; ma; mass; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: Radix

#24: The problem is, most people in this country think this is the right thing to do. They have never understood the Electoral College process. They don’t even understand what it means to be a Republic, not a simple Democracy.


41 posted on 07/27/2010 3:15:00 PM PDT by DallasDeb (USAFA '06 Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

If states end up doing this and the courts allow it, this will open the door for lots of fraud in voting.


42 posted on 07/27/2010 3:15:49 PM PDT by DallasDeb (USAFA '06 Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Gee, I seem to remember a clause in the dusty old piece of paper called the US Constitution stating that each State shall guarantee a republican form of government.


43 posted on 07/27/2010 3:15:58 PM PDT by thecabal (Destroy Progressivism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

It will never get 67 votes in the Senate.


44 posted on 07/27/2010 3:16:01 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Helter Skelter. The Revolution is Upon Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

Apparently they have a provision to ignore the law if a non socialist wins the popular vote


45 posted on 07/27/2010 3:16:05 PM PDT by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
If MA wants to assign their electors according to the popular vote, then fine. How many do they get? Twelve?

Considering the number of folks voting with their feet and bugging out of MA, more now than they'll have later.

46 posted on 07/27/2010 3:17:01 PM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29. Over 370 roll call votes missed and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

But what about states that are mainly republican? If those legislatures pass a similar bill, then their votes would to to the Democrats, should the democrat win the popular vote. We must keep our legislatures from passing this bill!


47 posted on 07/27/2010 3:19:53 PM PDT by DallasDeb (USAFA '06 Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
So, the only time this could ever have an impact is if a Republican wins the popular vote in a tight race but is behind in the EC until.... Massachusetts to the rescue!!!

I say, let ‘em pass it!

This scenario would be worth the entertainment value alone.

48 posted on 07/27/2010 3:19:58 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

**Won’t that be funny to watch the next time a republican wins the popular vote...?**

It surely will - watching those folks choke on their own bile. giggle

You can bet that law will then be repealed as quickly as the Ted Kennedy succession bill.


49 posted on 07/27/2010 3:21:25 PM PDT by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: chickadee

Oh, heck yes. Laws in Massachusetts are temporary, at best.


50 posted on 07/27/2010 3:22:35 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (When life gives you lemons, throw them back and demand chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nmh
"This is a BAD move.

Voter FRAUD will determine who wins."

That's pretty much what happens today....look at the Florida Fiasco and how an attempt was made by the Progressives (aka, Communists/Socialists) tried to steal the Presidential Election, and how Franken was illegally winning his seat.

The "SOS Project" (to win as many Secretary of State positions) was solely purposed to make sure a close election count resulted in the "Progressive" candidate winning, using whatever maneuvers were necessary to tilt the election.

A National Popular vote will merely mean that Flyover Country will not matter, and NY, CA, FL, etc. will simply pack the popular vote in their handouts' favor.

Same as All-Star Baseball is packed with CA and NY players due to sheer numbers, we will have Democrats/Progressives/Socialists forever elected in National Elections, period.

This will be the impetus for movements to seceed from the Union, as being merely the source of cash for handouts in the Big States and Big Cities (aka, cesspools) will cause the people in the small states to say "we're outa here...."

51 posted on 07/27/2010 3:23:55 PM PDT by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DallasDeb
But what about states that are mainly republican? If those legislatures pass a similar bill, then their votes would to to the Democrats, should the democrat win the popular vote.

I'd like to think there isn't a Republican with more than two brain cells who would ever entertain the idea of swapping out the Electoral Collage for popular vote.

52 posted on 07/27/2010 3:23:55 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

:)


53 posted on 07/27/2010 3:24:55 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DallasDeb

The Electoral College compromise is the only reason the constitution was ratified.
The Electoral College can only be abolished by Constituional Ammendment
States are free to designate their electors anway they choose, even give them to some candidate that lost in their state, but their electors still must vote in the Electoral College if they are to be counted


54 posted on 07/27/2010 3:26:24 PM PDT by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

More of the attempt to perform an end-run around the mandatory process required to amend the Constitution for such things; an amendment which I would also oppose if they tried that route.

What I don’t get with these nuts, is that the bare bones of their action is that their “law” tries to disregard the selection that results from their own voters, throw it out whether or not their voters chose someone else, and replace it with a decision some other “majority” made.

The Electoral College helps preserve the Federal nature of our republic. It ties the “popular” vote of individuals to the votes of the 50 states, as entities with Federal representation no less than individuals.

It also still (but not for long) prevents a small minority of states from electing a President on their own, just because, though only a few states, they have a large population.

A nation is not just “the people”. It is the land, the places, the regions, the states, the communities with all their distinct qualities and characters. To simply tie together the votes of the two coasts, add possibly Florida and a couple other states and, by such means achieve a “majority”, and consider it the “choice” of the nation would be a farce.

If anything, if the bi-coastal regions and a few other areas continue to have out-sized population increases, we may need an amendment to add an additional one or more Senators so that the Electoral College can continue to keep “a majority of the states” as what wins a Presidential election.


55 posted on 07/27/2010 3:30:35 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

If these communist idiots are “bypassing” the electoral college, then why would they still be sending their electors to vote there?


56 posted on 07/27/2010 3:30:52 PM PDT by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DallasDeb

RE: “But what about states that are mainly republican? If those legislatures pass a similar bill, then their votes would to to the Democrats, should the democrat win the popular vote. We must keep our legislatures from passing this bill!”

**************

I agree with you — there’s a REASON blue states are pushing so hard for this! Mark Levin is talking about it now and is livid!


57 posted on 07/27/2010 3:35:03 PM PDT by CaliforniaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The Socialist Democratic Workers Peoples Republic of Maryland strikes again.


58 posted on 07/27/2010 3:38:33 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000; All

“Bypassing” is a bad word. This isnt unconstitutional at all.

According to Article 2, Section 1:
“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress..”

The Constitution says it is up to the state to decide how their electors are to be distributed.

States like Maine and Nebraska have split their electoral votes by congressional districts.

The States have a right to do this. It is perfectly constitutional.


59 posted on 07/27/2010 3:40:22 PM PDT by jerry557
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

Massachusetts to the rescue!!!


A state with a history of passing laws of political convenience.


60 posted on 07/27/2010 3:40:59 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson