Posted on 11/09/2010 10:08:58 PM PST by BAW
Copy of Miller's lawsuit at the link.
The law is clear and should be followed. If it's misspelled or the oval is blank,.....NO VOTE. If they spelled the name right ans leave the oval blank, is that a valid vote? It may seem so, but that's not the law.
Hear, hear!
Those who "let things fall where they may" too often end up with things falling down around their ears.
Been there. Done that. HATED it!
Murkwosky must not get away with this!
Great way to put that!
Funny how when Murky first decided to run as a write-in the news at the time was she was too late to get on the ballot.
Isn’t that another thing that should be looked at.
On Big Gov site? I saw only favorable comments.
Mark Levin had him on and gave him a clue. Quite a few clues in fact. Joe Miller finally woke up.
Miller needs to have all misspelled Murkow names made ineligible and this is done via the courts. Only way he can win in my opinion
I agree with you, I just don’t see how the Bush v. Gore decision is a slam dunk for Miller. I think Miller’s attorneys are correct, but I think tihs won’t be as easy as a Bush v. Gore precedent decision by a judge deciding the case.
It took me awhile to read through those, but it is clear even to me that Miller has a solid case. I liked the argument on page 20 section D of the request for injunction. That people were planning on intentionally spelling Lisa’s name wrong as a protest vote. So how do you separate those protest votes from the real ones?
So what all did Levin tell Miller?
Any update about that state contractor who was in the state building/office basically asking for votes for The Murk the day before election day?
Good for him. Lisa has proved already she is a cheat, liar and thief. Do people really want someone that would do the same to them?
But it will all end up in the lap of the state legislature. I think they are government teat suckers. Miller will not prevail.
I encourage every here that supports Joe to follow through and donate $10-20 bucks to help him fight! That wicked lady has deep pockets supporting her. Joe needs help!
I don’t remember seeing another Murkowski but there is a Lisa M. Laskey and that is enough to challenge an error.
I don’t think anyone wrote-in Miller. His supporters would vote for him on the ballot.
Also, if anyone wrote-in Miller, that ballot will be tossed out. Miller didn’t registering for the write-in oval. He needed to do that the same date that Lzzzb mskihnonafr, that skank debutante.
No more count till we win election FRAUD/THEFT!
“If the morons can’t spell Murkowski’s name correctly or are unable to fill in the little oval, they probably shouldn’t be voting anyway.”
If the morons can’t spell Murkowski’s name after being given a piece of paper with her name spelled correctly, they probably shouldn’t be voting anyway.”
There, fixed it.
“How many votes did the Lizard People get?”
Almost as many as the crab people. /gratuitous South Park reference.
I remember Bush v Gore, but I also remember the trend: it’s the intent of the voter that matters.
And therefore it’s the interpretation.
And therefore it’s the judge.
And the judge owes...whom?
Let’s face it, if the Murky One got this far, something’s rotten in the state of Alaska. Doesn’t matter that the poor oppressed underfunded public skrool dropout spelled it wrong, Murkowski was the intent and that vote will be counted at least once. If not for the mean, stingy Republicans, the voter would have had a proper education and caviar in the cafeteria.
>>> Miller Files Suit to Halt Alaskan Vote Count
In other words, the recount was crushing him. So he pulls a Gore.
>>> Lisa has proved already she is a cheat, liar and thief. Do people really want someone that would do the same to them?
More to the point, do people really want a senator who would disenfranchise voters for a spelling error.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.