Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miller Still Leads In Uncontested Ballot Count
JoeMiller.US ^ | November 14, 2010 | Joe Miller Campaign Staff

Posted on 11/15/2010 10:13:52 AM PST by no dems

Anchorage, Alaska. November 14, 2010 -- After 5 days of write-in ballot counting, Republican nominee Joe Miller still leads incumbent Lisa Murkowski in the uncontested write-in ballot count. As of Sunday night, 88,076 of the total 98,565 write-in votes have been counted and Miller has 87,517 uncontested votes and Murkowski only has 78,697. If current trends hold, Miller and Murkowski will likely end up in a dead heat in the uncontested ballot count.

Tomorrow, approximately 8,800 absentee ballots are due to be counted as well as 1,000 overseas (mostly military) ballots. Miller has had a very strong showing in the absentee ballots and particularly among the military community. Miller campaign spokesman Randy DeSoto said, "If previous trends hold for the absentee ballot count, it is possible for Joe to gain as many as 1,000 votes against Lisa Murkowski tomorrow."

The next issue will be determining the standard to apply for ascertaining the validity of challenged ballots. Desoto said, "The obvious standard must be the law. We are a nation of laws, not of men." DeSoto also explained that, "The Lieutenant Governor, following the announcement of Lisa Murkowski's write-in candidacy, stated that the law would be applied, as written. We expect to hold the state to the law. The time and place to alter the law is in the legislature. The Division of Elections' actions here to modify clear law is troubling and concerning. After 50 years of state elections, the Division of Elections has all of a sudden adopted all sorts of new procedures just for this election. We are watching this to ensure this election is transparent, fair and legitimate. So far, what we have seen, should give the voting public pause."

The law in Alaska is clear: "A vote for a write-in candidate...shall be counted if the oval is filled in for that candidate and if the name, as it appears on the write-in declaration of candidacy, of the candidate or the last name of the candidate is written in the space provided." [AS 15.15.360 (11)]

The law also states (in a provision conveniently ignored so far by the State and Murkowski) that "The rules set out in this section are mandatory and there are no exceptions to them. A ballot may not be counted unless marked in compliance with these rules." [AS 15.15.360 (b)]. For reasons never explained, the State and Murkowski now claim that, even though the law bars exceptions for everyone else, there will be exceptions for Lisa Murkowski. Said Joe Miller, "We need one standard for everyone. It makes no sense to create all these new exceptions just for Lisa Murkowski. I have said from the beginning, I want a fair election and I want the law followed. I don't think that is too much to ask."

DeSoto added, "Lisa Murkowski spent hundreds of thousand of dollars on her spelling bee ad making it very clear that she knew what standard was expected and what had been applied for decades in this state prior to her write-in bid. She spent tens of thousands of dollars on wristbands, pencils, brochures, and temporary tattoos emphasizing the need for proper spelling. She even convinced the Division of Elections to provide (and went to court to make sure it continued to provide), for the first time in 50 years and, in violation of its own regulations, a write-in list so that voters would know how to spell her name properly. Then, the Division of Elections took the extraordinary step of changing the standard, just 36 hours prior to the start of the count to a newly created "voter intent" and/or phonetic standard." Miller observers have seen the Division of Elections apply the statute's standard ("name, as it appears on the write-in declaration of candidacy") to other declared write-in candidates while applying the voter intent/phonetic standard to Murkowski's. DeSoto noted, "The integrity of the vote is at issue. The people of Alaska need to know the law is king, and just because you're a Murkowski doesn't mean that the rules get changed to your benefit."

The Miller Campaign has filed a suit in federal court last week to uphold the rule of law in Alaska. The brief from the state of Alaska is due tomorrow and Miller's is due November 18th.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: miller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
I'd ride this all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court
1 posted on 11/15/2010 10:13:57 AM PST by no dems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: no dems
Just don't cave, Joe. That's all we ask.

Fight all the way to the bitter end.

2 posted on 11/15/2010 10:17:31 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The people who hate Sarah Palin hate her because they know that her Presidency is inevitable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

The LSM has tried desperately to paint this as a “done deal”. I’m glad to see that it just ain’t so!


3 posted on 11/15/2010 10:18:46 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

This is very poorly written, or I’m thoroughly confused; why does Joe Miller have 87,517 write-in votes?


4 posted on 11/15/2010 10:19:09 AM PST by sodpoodle (Despair; man's surrender. Laughter; God 's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
As of Sunday night, 88,076 of the total 98,565 write-in votes have been counted and Miller has 87,517 uncontested votes and Murkowski only has 78,697.

Help. Can someone explain this to me?

5 posted on 11/15/2010 10:19:46 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Starve the beast. Save the liver!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

It’s the new math. Journalism school...


6 posted on 11/15/2010 10:21:27 AM PST by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
You have misread it. It reads:

" Miller has 87,517 uncontested votes'

7 posted on 11/15/2010 10:22:07 AM PST by sausageseller (If you want to cut your own throat, don't come to me for a bandage. M, Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Total of all uncontested votes.


8 posted on 11/15/2010 10:23:08 AM PST by sausageseller (If you want to cut your own throat, don't come to me for a bandage. M, Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: no dems

I don’t understand how Murkey lost the primary to Miller and then has so many people voting for her write-in. What am I missing? Beside voter fraud?


9 posted on 11/15/2010 10:23:20 AM PST by YellowRoseofTx (Evil is not the opposite of God; it's the absence of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

I think Miller gives us the correct number of ballots to be counted.


10 posted on 11/15/2010 10:24:36 AM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

The dems voted for her because their guy had no shot. It was a strategy on 538.


11 posted on 11/15/2010 10:25:41 AM PST by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Miller is an embarrassment to lawyers. Yale.
12 posted on 11/15/2010 10:25:44 AM PST by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

Rats can vote for whomever they want in the general election. No doubt the Cow got many.


13 posted on 11/15/2010 10:27:12 AM PST by sausageseller (If you want to cut your own throat, don't come to me for a bandage. M, Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
I agree that it's horribly written, but remember, before the counting of the write ins began, Murkowski had zero votes.
14 posted on 11/15/2010 10:27:24 AM PST by j.havenfarm (Placer County: CA's Republican Citadel - 48.39% registration, highest in the state,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Bump.


15 posted on 11/15/2010 10:27:54 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Here it is in black and white: The pinkos went green 'cause they're too yellow to admit they're red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

I *think* it means Murkowski has 78,697, all of which are obviously write-ins, that are uncontested.

Miller has 87,517, which includes both ballots cast on election day and those that were written in.


16 posted on 11/15/2010 10:28:16 AM PST by EDINVA (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: no dems

KEEP FIGHTING JOE MILLER....that is your seat senate and murky no longer has a right to it.


17 posted on 11/15/2010 10:30:20 AM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast; battlecry; no dems

>>> Miller has 87,517 uncontested votes and Murkowski only has 78,697. Help. Can someone explain this to me?

As best as I can understand it, this means Miller has the “lead” by virtue of contesting more of the oppositions votes then they have contested of his.

>>> It’s the new math. Journalism school...

I wouldn’t pin this on the journalism school. Miller creates his own lead by filing objections based on penmanship and the like.

I wouldn’t expect most of these objections to hold.


18 posted on 11/15/2010 10:31:31 AM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

Dems crossing over plus the GOP vote remaining split from the primary.

They tried to do the same thing in Florida, but failed because they couldn’t get enough Dems to cross nor did the GOP vote fracture.


19 posted on 11/15/2010 10:31:42 AM PST by jerry557
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

Democrats and Independents. The Dem in the race scored only about 20% of the vote.


20 posted on 11/15/2010 10:32:59 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson