Posted on 12/05/2010 1:13:20 PM PST by FS11
WikiLeaks has yet again flooded the internet with thousands of classified American documents, this time state department cables. More troubling than WikiLeaks' latest revelation of US secrets, however, is the Obama administration's weak, wrong-headed and erratic response. Unfortunately, the administration has acted consistently with its demonstrated unwillingness to assert and defend US interests across a wide range of threats, such as Iran and North Korea, which, ironically, the leaked cables amply document.
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
http://www.nachumlist.com/Wiki-gate.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2637720/posts
Wiki-gate Links of BO to WikiLeaks:
http://www.nachumlist.com/Wiki-gate.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2637720/posts
bttt
The most stunning revelation here is the John Bolton actually writes for the Guardian...
I liken the obama administration to throwing darts left handed randomly at a dart board.
The most stunning revelation here is the John Bolton actually writes for the Guardian...
This must be a fluke on nature! Please go to the article, and read the comments at bottom! Talk about being thrown in the lions den! Whatta guy!
John Bolton for Master of the Empire!
Socialist Mooch Guardian readers don’t care for Bolton at all.
I just get sick reading their comments.
By leaking State Department Cables BO has made himself public enemy #1 of all Diplomats worldwide and subjected himself for a lawsuit to legally remove him from office directly before SCOTUS.
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html
It is finally dawning on some voters that there is a downside to putting a “Rock Star” in the White House.
Some real in depth and worthy of read comments there.
The ones that weren't removed anyway.
Great piece by John however!
Yes, usually liberal newspapers get the wimpiest ‘conservative’ they can find for balance. For example, the NY Times has David Brooke.
Conservative papers do the same thing. The Wall Street Journal had Thomas Frank, whose columns were unbelievably bad.
Great piece by John however!
12 posted on Sunday, December 05, 2010 3:53:39 PM by EGPWS
Ditto.
By leaking State Department Cables, BO has made himself public enemy #1 of all Diplomats worldwide and subjected himself to a lawsuit to legally remove him from office directly before SCOTUS.
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html
All that said, this does not mean he's without idealism. Fact is, he has very strong opinions on issues and he's very forceful in pushing them through. While this administration would like to pretend as if their health care bill is viewed unfavorable because of a communications problem, the truth is the contrary. This administration is extremely savvy at manipulating the media, which is baseline heavily biased in their favor anyhow. They enjoyed absolute power by holding the House, Senate and Presidency. He had the race, youth, money, looks and common man (plain folk) advantages. They had near unprecedented favorability ratings when taking office, the opposition was completely dominated, hardly able to get their message out in the media.............. The issue isn't communications, it's the “quality of the decisions, the lack of true leadership”
Most in corporate America or even the government have known those that really have no interest in the key job duties but apply for a higher position simply for pay, prestige and power. Likewise, he may very well be the first Commander in Chief that really has little interest in being this. It simply was the highest political office in the nation and he wanted to be #1. A young man with little life experience, a weak entourage albeit savvy in campaigning, this administration is probably the least experienced but most ideological ever since at least post WWII. There is a reason why when confronted with any issue this administration basically deals with it as if it's on the campaign trail. With no business, economics, law enforcement, defense, intelligence, foreign affairs, staff or executive experience he rode to power based on symbolism (race), a name that stuck out, logo (The first President with true product branding), cool demeanor (never looked stressed, walk with a swagger.......), handsome (thin, tight abs, big white teeth, nice suits) and essentially promising everyone everything. While his election into office is a sad statement about the electorate of this nation that does not look at voting records nor positions on issues, experience nor real qualifications they eventually will get disillusioned by a classic demagogue like this. Eventually his words get will get old and people will still want a job, good schools, have the crime dealt with or national security threats........... Even if they on a personal level love the symbolism, at the end of the day they will not like his health care, carbon tax, gay..........agenda because America is a slightly center right nation when it comes to values. Obama is a likable guy to most Americans, they just don't rally like what he wants to do to them.
All that said, this does not mean he's without idealism. Fact is, he has very strong opinions on issues and he's very forceful in pushing them through. While this administration would like to pretend as if their health care bill is viewed unfavorable because of a communications problem, the truth is the contrary. This administration is extremely savvy at manipulating the media, which is baseline heavily biased in their favor anyhow. They enjoyed absolute power by holding the House, Senate and Presidency. He had the race, youth, money, looks and common man (plain folk) advantages. They had near unprecedented favorability ratings when taking office, the opposition was completely dominated, hardly able to get their message out in the media.............. The issue isn't communications, it's the “quality of the decisions, the lack of true leadership”
Most in corporate America or even the government have known those that really have no interest in the key job duties but apply for a higher position simply for pay, prestige and power. Likewise, he may very well be the first Commander in Chief that really has little interest in being this. It simply was the highest political office in the nation and he wanted to be #1. A young man with little life experience, a weak entourage albeit savvy in campaigning, this administration is probably the least experienced but most ideological ever since at least post WWII. There is a reason why when confronted with any issue this administration basically deals with it as if it's on the campaign trail. With no business, economics, law enforcement, defense, intelligence, foreign affairs, staff or executive experience he rode to power based on symbolism (race), a name that stuck out, logo (The first President with true product branding), cool demeanor (never looked stressed, walk with a swagger.......), handsome (thin, tight abs, big white teeth, nice suits) and essentially promising everyone everything. While his election into office is a sad statement about the electorate of this nation that does not look at voting records nor positions on issues, experience nor real qualifications they eventually will get disillusioned by a classic demagogue like this. Eventually his words get will get old and people will still want a job, good schools, have the crime dealt with or national security threats........... Even if they on a personal level love the symbolism, at the end of the day they will not like his health care, carbon tax, gay..........agenda because America is a slightly center right nation when it comes to values. Obama is a likable guy to most Americans, they just don't rally like what he wants to do to them.
By leaking State Department Cables, BO has made himself public enemy #1 of all Diplomats worldwide and subjected himself to a lawsuit to legally remove him from office directly before SCOTUS.
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html
what that website recommends would require a heck of lot of mobilization in terms of time energy money and people
Bump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.