Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Wiki-gate Links of BO to WikiLeaks:

http://www.nachumlist.com/Wiki-gate.htm

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2637720/posts

1 posted on 12/05/2010 1:13:22 PM PST by FS11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

Wiki-gate Links of BO to WikiLeaks:

http://www.nachumlist.com/Wiki-gate.htm

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2637720/posts


2 posted on 12/05/2010 1:16:38 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bttt


3 posted on 12/05/2010 1:16:48 PM PST by Matchett-PI ( Sarah Palin / Marco Rubio - a "can't lose" ticket for 2012..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11

The most stunning revelation here is the John Bolton actually writes for the Guardian...


4 posted on 12/05/2010 1:17:40 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11

I liken the obama administration to throwing darts left handed randomly at a dart board.


5 posted on 12/05/2010 1:18:55 PM PST by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11

Socialist Mooch Guardian readers don’t care for Bolton at all.

I just get sick reading their comments.


9 posted on 12/05/2010 1:40:01 PM PST by nagdt ("None of my EX's live in Texas")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11

It is finally dawning on some voters that there is a downside to putting a “Rock Star” in the White House.


11 posted on 12/05/2010 1:41:02 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11
Based upon the discussion line at The Guardian web site, I can tell they have a type of easy going laid back people for a readership.

Some real in depth and worthy of read comments there.

The ones that weren't removed anyway.

Great piece by John however!

12 posted on 12/05/2010 1:53:39 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11
He's a man whose every explanation for why things are the way they are is based on some interpretation of the “conflict theory.” He's in reality no different than many other activists before him, may they be race baiters, environmental fear mongers, class warfare preaching socialists.......... He's just a bit more eloquent about it. He's in reality a provincially thinking man who likes to see himself cosmopolitan. His formal education and experience has little that prepared him for the job role he finds himself in, running a staff, as thee head executive dealing with foreign affairs, as Commander in Chief, the head of US intelligence and federal law enforcement community. The folks riding on his coat train that surrounded him and fill top positions are as simplistic in their economic, security, social and world views, as inexperienced, as he is.

All that said, this does not mean he's without idealism. Fact is, he has very strong opinions on issues and he's very forceful in pushing them through. While this administration would like to pretend as if their health care bill is viewed unfavorable because of a communications problem, the truth is the contrary. This administration is extremely savvy at manipulating the media, which is baseline heavily biased in their favor anyhow. They enjoyed absolute power by holding the House, Senate and Presidency. He had the race, youth, money, looks and common man (plain folk) advantages. They had near unprecedented favorability ratings when taking office, the opposition was completely dominated, hardly able to get their message out in the media.............. The issue isn't communications, it's the “quality of the decisions, the lack of true leadership”

Most in corporate America or even the government have known those that really have no interest in the key job duties but apply for a higher position simply for pay, prestige and power. Likewise, he may very well be the first Commander in Chief that really has little interest in being this. It simply was the highest political office in the nation and he wanted to be #1. A young man with little life experience, a weak entourage albeit savvy in campaigning, this administration is probably the least experienced but most ideological ever since at least post WWII. There is a reason why when confronted with any issue this administration basically deals with it as if it's on the campaign trail. With no business, economics, law enforcement, defense, intelligence, foreign affairs, staff or executive experience he rode to power based on symbolism (race), a name that stuck out, logo (The first President with true product branding), cool demeanor (never looked stressed, walk with a swagger.......), handsome (thin, tight abs, big white teeth, nice suits) and essentially promising everyone everything. While his election into office is a sad statement about the electorate of this nation that does not look at voting records nor positions on issues, experience nor real qualifications they eventually will get disillusioned by a classic demagogue like this. Eventually his words get will get old and people will still want a job, good schools, have the crime dealt with or national security threats........... Even if they on a personal level love the symbolism, at the end of the day they will not like his health care, carbon tax, gay..........agenda because America is a slightly center right nation when it comes to values. Obama is a likable guy to most Americans, they just don't rally like what he wants to do to them.

15 posted on 12/05/2010 2:03:00 PM PST by Red6 (IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11
He's a man whose every explanation for why things are the way they are is based on some interpretation of the “conflict theory.” He's in reality no different than many other activists before him, may they be race baiters, environmental fear mongers, class warfare preaching socialists.......... He's just a bit more eloquent about it. He's in reality a provincially thinking man who likes to see himself cosmopolitan. His formal education and experience has little that prepared him for the job role he finds himself in, running a staff, as thee head executive dealing with foreign affairs, as Commander in Chief, the head of US intelligence and federal law enforcement community. The folks riding on his coat train that surrounded him and fill top positions are as simplistic in their economic, security, social and world views, as inexperienced, as he is.

All that said, this does not mean he's without idealism. Fact is, he has very strong opinions on issues and he's very forceful in pushing them through. While this administration would like to pretend as if their health care bill is viewed unfavorable because of a communications problem, the truth is the contrary. This administration is extremely savvy at manipulating the media, which is baseline heavily biased in their favor anyhow. They enjoyed absolute power by holding the House, Senate and Presidency. He had the race, youth, money, looks and common man (plain folk) advantages. They had near unprecedented favorability ratings when taking office, the opposition was completely dominated, hardly able to get their message out in the media.............. The issue isn't communications, it's the “quality of the decisions, the lack of true leadership”

Most in corporate America or even the government have known those that really have no interest in the key job duties but apply for a higher position simply for pay, prestige and power. Likewise, he may very well be the first Commander in Chief that really has little interest in being this. It simply was the highest political office in the nation and he wanted to be #1. A young man with little life experience, a weak entourage albeit savvy in campaigning, this administration is probably the least experienced but most ideological ever since at least post WWII. There is a reason why when confronted with any issue this administration basically deals with it as if it's on the campaign trail. With no business, economics, law enforcement, defense, intelligence, foreign affairs, staff or executive experience he rode to power based on symbolism (race), a name that stuck out, logo (The first President with true product branding), cool demeanor (never looked stressed, walk with a swagger.......), handsome (thin, tight abs, big white teeth, nice suits) and essentially promising everyone everything. While his election into office is a sad statement about the electorate of this nation that does not look at voting records nor positions on issues, experience nor real qualifications they eventually will get disillusioned by a classic demagogue like this. Eventually his words get will get old and people will still want a job, good schools, have the crime dealt with or national security threats........... Even if they on a personal level love the symbolism, at the end of the day they will not like his health care, carbon tax, gay..........agenda because America is a slightly center right nation when it comes to values. Obama is a likable guy to most Americans, they just don't rally like what he wants to do to them.

16 posted on 12/05/2010 2:05:44 PM PST by Red6 (IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11

John Bolton BTTT.


21 posted on 12/05/2010 2:38:56 PM PST by MaggieCarta (Princess of "PDS"---Porter, Dark mild and Stout. I'm talkin' beer, here, people..Ok, English ales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11

When a situation that warrants an appropriate action Obama will be rather occupied - golf, basketball or a party. see that says it all the president is rather occupied with his own interests, America does not matter. It does fit his agenda.


24 posted on 12/05/2010 2:50:00 PM PST by hondact200 ( Obama is Nuckin Futs!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11
John Bolton:

The more appropriate response is to prosecute everyone associated with these leaks to the fullest extent of US law, which the justice department at least appears to be considering.

Hey John - does that include the New York Times? Do you actually believe Holder's DoJ will charge them with "Treason"?

Can't we at least wait and see if Assange's "classified" leaks reveal 0bama's BC, his college transcripts, and WHO allowed the leak IN THE FIRST PLACE?

Or is Bolton afraid his CFR past, as well as the identities of the BoA cheats and Federal Reserve will be revealed?

25 posted on 12/05/2010 2:50:14 PM PST by Conservative Tsunami
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11
WikiLeaks



Should I use the Silver or the Copper Bullet??
Or maybe I just go away.

27 posted on 12/05/2010 3:01:54 PM PST by Koracan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11

Sorry, but I can’t help bt thinking that Obama and his backers like Soros, are behind these leaks!


29 posted on 12/05/2010 3:28:22 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FS11

He dont good, that Ambassador BOLTON.


32 posted on 12/05/2010 4:30:25 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Do the "W" memoirs have an advance "sorry" about possible war with N. Korea, due to idiotic policy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson