Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House majority leader says Ryan, not Bachmann speaks for the GOP
CNN ^

Posted on 01/24/2011 1:40:29 PM PST by roses of sharon

Washington (CNN) – There may be two House Republicans giving high-profile responses to President Obama's State of the Union speech on Tuesday night, but House Majority Leader Eric Cantor made it clear that it's the new House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, not Minnesota Rep. Michelle Bachmann, who is speaking for the GOP.

"Paul Ryan is giving the official response," Cantor said when asked at his weekly session with reporters if Bachmann's response will step on the GOP message.

After House Speaker John Boehner and Senator GOP Leader Mitch McConnell announced on Friday that Ryan would deliver the GOP response, the Tea Party Express put out word that Rep. Bachmann would also be commenting on the President's speech and they would broadcast her remarks on their website. On Monday, her office welcomed network television coverage of her speech, which will be delivered from the Capitol Hill Club, just steps away from the U.S. Capitol campus.

Lumping Rep. Bachmann in with the rest of the entire membership of Congress, Cantor said, "You know Michelle Bachmann, just like the other 534 members of the House and Senate, are going to have opinions as to the State of the Union." The House Majority Leader added, "This is a process that happens every year and I look forward to all comments," and noted again that Ryan's was the official Republican response to the president.

Pressed by CNN that unlike most other members of Congress, Bachmann's remarks were expected to receive similar televised coverage as Ryan's official response, Cantor laughed, and asked, "Then maybe I should ask why is that the case?"

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: bachmann; cantor4rinos; cantoragainsttparty; cantorvsteaparty; cantorwhacksteaparty; rinocantor; rinostripedcantor; ryan; union
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: cripplecreek
"I don’t have any problem with a response from both but I’ll pay more attention to Bachmann."

And that's what worries the Establishment RINO Republicans who are trying to keep conservatives in the dark about the actual character of the Republican Party leadership.

41 posted on 01/24/2011 2:07:07 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Clearly those 2 are RINO fiscons who want to throw us socons under the bus.


42 posted on 01/24/2011 2:09:50 PM PST by 83Vet4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: normy
POtuS Listens intently to Paul Ryan's proposals on Health Care...


43 posted on 01/24/2011 2:12:36 PM PST by jessduntno ("'How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think." - Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I think most people understand the difference. Ryan will speak for the Elite Establishment Wing of the GOP and Bachmann will speak for the Regular Folks in the GOP.


44 posted on 01/24/2011 2:17:39 PM PST by Walts Ice Pick ("I'm not going to shut up!" - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
So?

Ryan can speak for The Ruling Class and Bachmann can speak for The People.

What's the big deal? Sounds like a win-win to me.

45 posted on 01/24/2011 2:19:26 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Will there be any way to tell who gets more listeners?


46 posted on 01/24/2011 2:20:05 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walts Ice Pick

Yes, we understand the difference...so why doesn’t Cantor?

He simply teases the MSM not to cover her, jerk!


47 posted on 01/24/2011 2:20:32 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I’m glad Ryan is giving the response. He’s a good man, and the fact that they chose him speaks well.

And I’m glad Bachmann is going to speak up.

CNN is playing games here, trying to drive a wedge where there isn’t one.

And Cantor may be pandering just a bit. Anyone dumb enough to pander to CNN has just outed himself as not-ready-for-prime-time. I’m noticing who is proud to be seen with us and who isn’t, and I plan to remember. I had higher hopes for Cantor, but maybe he’s not ready to sit with the grown-ups.


48 posted on 01/24/2011 2:21:24 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 83Vet4Life

As far as I know Ryan has made ZERO indications he wants socons under the bus, he has been careful to be respectful, unlike other fiscal hawks.


49 posted on 01/24/2011 2:22:53 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

They’re not. Paul Ryan is giving the official response, Michelle Bachman’s will follow Ryan’s, on her website. At least that was how it was spelled out the other day.

I would caution readers on CNN reporting, their agenda will be to promote dissent within the GOP and use any sound bites of Cantor’s to advance that message. Take with a huge grain of salt.


50 posted on 01/24/2011 2:24:20 PM PST by SueRae (I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman
That is your prerogative but there are two parties and Bachmann is a member of one of them and that party has an official response and it will come from Ryan. I have never seen Bachmann kick Barry's butt face to face but I have seen Ryan do it and he did it with ease.
51 posted on 01/24/2011 2:27:13 PM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Nothing against Ryan, but Michelle Bachmann speaks for me.


52 posted on 01/24/2011 2:27:14 PM PST by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: normy

I like Ryan. But Cantor whining about the tea Party having Bachmann give another response is pathetic.


53 posted on 01/24/2011 2:29:34 PM PST by pissant ((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
I'll take either one over queasy Eric Cantor
54 posted on 01/24/2011 2:31:45 PM PST by dps.inspect (the system is rigged...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Actually, we know why — because CNN is attempting to divide republicans any way they can.

There are two parties in DC. Each get to do a speech. One is the President’s party, and the other is the opposition party.

Why should the tea party caucus get to make a televised speech? They don’t let the hispanic caucus, or the black caucus, or the progressive caucus, make televised speeches.

CNN is hoping that Bachman says something that will let them paint republicans in a bad light. If not, they can still muddle the message.

It’s not like Ryan is some rino, big-spending republican that we have to fight him. He’s one of the better guys. If we don’t learn to work together with our own side, it’s going to be another really short stint in power.

Cantor is the representative of the majority party. It’s his job to minimize the negative impact of Bachman giving a televised speech when the republican party is trying to do the same.

Bachman would be better off talking with Ryan and seeing if he can incorporate some of her major points in his presentation. We could have rallied around him with a solid, unified message.


55 posted on 01/24/2011 2:32:32 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

If they can’t work together with the majority party even on something as serious as the response to the SOTU speech, maybe they shouldn’t be taken as seriously.


56 posted on 01/24/2011 2:33:36 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Bachmann also speaks for me.


57 posted on 01/24/2011 2:35:36 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I'll listen to Ryan. I like him, and I respect him. But I'm going to listen to Bachmann too ... for the exact same reasons.


58 posted on 01/24/2011 2:36:09 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

This is why they put her on the Intelligence Committee. To keep her out of the way.


59 posted on 01/24/2011 2:36:26 PM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

No other republican is giving a speech at the same time as the republican response. No other democrat is giving a speech at hte same time sas the republican response. No other democrat is giving a speech at the same time as the President’s speech.

There is nothing “normal” about a major newscaster broadcasting a speech from a caucus leader instead of the opposition party’s leader.

Of course, I don’t see how these speeches could be at “the same time”. CNN certainly isn’t going to split-screen them, and they aren’t going to pre-empt the opposition speech for Bachman, because that would violate some pretty standard protocols for these speeches.

So in the end, it won’t be a big deal, Bachman will be speaking just like others do in the spin sessions, but CNN will try to make it out as something much bigger, something that hopefully the conservatives won’t contribute to.


60 posted on 01/24/2011 2:36:57 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson