Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Fudges on Whether it Would Save Israel
Israel National News ^ | 2-9-11 | Gil Ronen

Posted on 02/10/2011 9:10:11 AM PST by Aquamarine

White House Spokesman Robin Gibbs would not pledge to guarantee Israel's security if its existence is in danger, in a Wednesday press briefing. In reference to recent Middle East turmoil, he was asked: "If Israel is threatened by any of these new governments or Hamas and Hizbullah, if its existence is in danger, would the US come to its assistance?

Gibbs answered: "Regardless of the situation facing any government in the region, our friendship, our partnership and our alliance with Israel is unchanged."

Gibbs also said the Administration could not force a peace settlement on Israel and the PA. "The president has been involved from day one in seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Palestinians," he said, but added that "We cannot force those two into steps that they are unwilling to take steps to do themselves."

(Excerpt) Read more at Israel National News ...

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: israel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: PLD
Amen Brother, One little country and God make a majority and neither gives a hoot what muslins or any other idiots think about their security!
21 posted on 02/10/2011 10:08:39 AM PST by Colorado Cowgirl (God bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine

They wouldn’t. And Israel KNOWS they wouldn’t. Not under present leadership....


22 posted on 02/10/2011 10:13:51 AM PST by patriot preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine

They wouldn’t. And Israel KNOWS they wouldn’t. Not under present leadership....


23 posted on 02/10/2011 10:14:28 AM PST by patriot preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine

They wouldn’t. And Israel KNOWS they wouldn’t. Not under present leadership....


24 posted on 02/10/2011 10:14:56 AM PST by patriot preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot preacher

ANd I wish I knew WHY FR is publishing my posts X 3!!


25 posted on 02/10/2011 10:18:50 AM PST by patriot preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PLD

So do I.


26 posted on 02/10/2011 10:20:48 AM PST by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine

I was thinking maybe Sir Robin the Chicken Hearted.

Run away! Run away!


27 posted on 02/10/2011 10:36:44 AM PST by Fred Hayek (FUBO! I salute you with the soles of my shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine

I wouldn’t believe anything Gibbs had to say either way.


28 posted on 02/10/2011 10:40:36 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine
"Regardless of the situation facing any government in the region, our friendship, our partnership and our alliance with Israel is unchanged."

He should have then been questioned as to what the administrations understanding of "our friendship, our partnership and our alliance with Israel" Actually is.

29 posted on 02/10/2011 11:17:49 AM PST by alexandria ("If this be treason, make the most of it!" Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...
Gibbs answered: "Regardless of the situation facing any government in the region, our friendship, our partnership and our alliance with Israel is unchanged."
Yeah, as if *that's* a good sign for US-Israel relations. Zero has made himself look (at best) like a petulant child when dealing with Israel, and now with Egypt, and soon (again) with Israel, and here on FR the very same nicks who opposed Bush's nation-building are 100 percent in favor of Zero's doing the same thing, while pretending it's not the same -- but with a pro-jihadist and anti-democratic focus. Thanks Aquamarine.


30 posted on 02/11/2011 8:17:32 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson