Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stand Up to Bullies of the NRA
RealClearPolitics ^ | March 17, 2011 | E.J. Dionne

Posted on 03/16/2011 10:50:34 PM PDT by neverdem

WASHINGTON -- "My administration has not curtailed the rights of gun owners," the president boasted, "it has expanded them, including allowing people to carry their guns in national parks and wildlife refuges."

No, that wasn't George W. Bush. It was President Obama in an op-ed piece published Sunday in the Arizona Daily Star that practically begged the gun lobby to support modest reforms of our lax gun laws.

He wasn't even asking for a ban on those large gun magazines, which would almost certainly have saved lives on that January day in Tucson when six people were killed and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was among 13 wounded by gunfire.

What Obama endorsed were, well, baby steps toward strengthening background checks to keep guns out of the hands of "dangerous criminals and fugitives" and those who are "unbalanced." That's a fine idea, though his specific proposals -- "enforcing laws that are already on the books," "reward the states that provide the best data," "make the system faster and nimbler" -- were hardly the stuff of political courage...

--snip--

The first statement is a wild distortion of the position of actual advocates of sane gun laws. They are not seeking "sweeping anti-gun legislation." They are pushing tame steps LaPierre and his lobbyists reject -- thorough background checks and a ban on those big magazines. Yes, restoring the highly effective ban on assault weapons would also be good. But that's Obama's own position. Isn't it?

Obama observed last week that "bullying can have destructive consequences for our young people." It can also have destructive consequences for politicians. The president could set a good example by standing up to the bullies of the NRA.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; democrats; enemedia; liberalmedia; mediabias; nra; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Yes, restoring the highly effective ban on assault weapons would also be good.

E.J.'s been hangin' with Charlie Sheen. Cut him some slack.

1 posted on 03/16/2011 10:50:36 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

You can bet the effeminate E.J. has seen his share of bullies in his day. LOL! I bet he caught hell in school.


2 posted on 03/16/2011 10:52:52 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (If you thought the lame duck Congress was fun, you're gonna love a lame duck Kenyan president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

E.J. Dionne — what a classic douchebag


3 posted on 03/16/2011 11:08:11 PM PDT by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

E.J. Dionne — what a classic douchebag


4 posted on 03/16/2011 11:08:18 PM PDT by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“our lax gun laws...”

we need “sane gun laws...”

FRiends, do not be fooled.

The effect of “GUN LAWS” is to limit ownership through humiliation and red tape, to indoctrinate adults and children (ie No Gun Zones) to fear and hate firearms, and to actually criminalize (without criminal intent) huge swaths of “illegal” behavior for the firearm owner. When to carry? Where? Loaded? Unloaded? In the trunk?...

The older I get the more I am coming to understand that ALL gun Laws are unconstitutional, and wrong.


5 posted on 03/16/2011 11:26:26 PM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golux

Congress should make it an act of treason, punishable by death, to propose any new gun laws that in any way restrict the Second Amendment.


6 posted on 03/16/2011 11:38:29 PM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"it has expanded them, including allowing people to carry their guns in national parks and wildlife refuges."

Allow? They allow? That is mighty white of 0bozo.

Yes, restoring the highly effective ban on assault weapons would also be good.

No words...

7 posted on 03/16/2011 11:39:07 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This one needed a Barf Alert :-)


8 posted on 03/16/2011 11:47:18 PM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux
I say we propose a law that restricts the rights of liberals to speak. Let's see how they like having their rights trampled on!

They are the bullies, and they know it.

Gun control is all about controlling people, and we know it.

9 posted on 03/17/2011 12:22:19 AM PDT by TheWriterTX (Buy Ammo Often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
He wasn't even asking for a ban on those large gun magazines, which would almost certainly have saved lives on that January day in Tucson when six people were killed and Rep Gabrielle Giffords was among 13 wounded by gunfire.

Only if the CRIMINAL perp were a law abiding citizen, when it came to his choice of magazines.

OTOH, none of my high capacity Glock magazines have ever done anything their smaller brethren haven't done, except give me 3-5 shot groups instead of 2, before reloading.

OTOOH, it takes almost the same amount of time to fire off 15 shots from 2-10 round mags as it does to empty 1-15 rounder; the real world difference is negligible...unless you're a fumble-fingers.

None of my "assault" rifles have ever misbehaved, either; at least not since I caught one trying to sneak out one night with the SUV. I paddled them both, and sent them to their rooms. Not a problem since.

10 posted on 03/17/2011 12:33:38 AM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Made in America, by proud American citizens, in 1946.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llandres
This one needed a Barf Alert

Durn. Almost got to the bottom of the thread, hoping to tag that deficit, but you got there first.

Rules are good. Now someone needs to mention MoDo so we can invoke the CZ-J Rule.

11 posted on 03/17/2011 1:00:39 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Someone send this hack a copy of the constitution with the second amendment highlighted in marker.


12 posted on 03/17/2011 1:18:13 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; All

E.J. Dionne, the Defender of Selective Amendments.

Moron.


13 posted on 03/17/2011 3:58:28 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (For the first time in my adult life, I'm scared of my government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yeah and I guess the NRA shouldn’t fund ANY of your Democrat buddies, next ELECTION, huh Dion?


14 posted on 03/17/2011 4:03:40 AM PDT by JSDude1 (December 18, 2010 the Day the radical homosexual left declared WAR on the US Military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
practically begged the gun lobby to support modest reforms of our lax gun laws.

What a moron. Lax gun laws? Liberal garbage like this should may be popular in Boston and NYC, where the men are bedwetting crybabies, and the women are even worse, but for the rest of the country, we ain't buying it.

15 posted on 03/17/2011 4:05:35 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

What a twisted headline. The NRA teaches and helps people to stand up to bullies.


16 posted on 03/17/2011 4:08:23 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Don't think of us as "Bullies" Mr President.

Rather, think of us as a "Second Amendment Union."

17 posted on 03/17/2011 4:14:25 AM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux

Government is the bully, not the NRA.


18 posted on 03/17/2011 4:38:55 AM PDT by Roklok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Da Mav
Hey Fruity !

so the constitution is a bully eh????

19 posted on 03/17/2011 5:02:30 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
They are not seeking "sweeping anti-gun legislation."

Leftwingtard E.J. Dionne, YOU LIE.

Obama and Holder want to BAN PRIVATE SALES of firearms. They also want to ban people from bequeathing arms to their children or grandchildren without going through a government-approved dealer, who will register the firearm in the unconstitutional government database.

Make no mistake: such bans are tantamount to the END of the 2nd and 4th Amendments. When all legal guns are those registered and ownership-tracked by the government, there is no freedom to own arms, and no right to be secure in your person and papers.

Why? Because at a moment's notice, a particularly tyrannical government can come for them. Yes, that would foment a civil war (I pray some would resist), but I believe that MILLIONS of sheeple would just turn their guns in, just like they did in England and Australia. These are Obama's model. He is following a path to confiscation.

This is a hill to die on. Private sales of firearms MUST continue. We either pay in blood now, or pay much more blood later.

20 posted on 03/17/2011 5:16:53 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson