A National Embarrassment
He bamboozled millions... gave us the old 'okee doke.
Posted on 03/30/2011 9:01:16 PM PDT by circumbendibus
Arguments in a lawsuit on Barack Obama's eligibility that has been percolating through the federal court system in California since the 2008 election will be heard at the appellate level in just a few weeks.
Officials with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today notified attorneys representing several dozen individuals – members of the military, members of state government and even a candidate for president – that oral arguments will be held May 2.
"I can't believe it, but after two years of Obama litigation, for the first time the court of appeals scheduled oral argument in [the] Obama case," wrote Orly Taitz, a California attorney who has litigated a number of challenges to Obama.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Maybe. Look at all the talk on TV and the radio in the last two weeks. It's almost as if they got the green light. Eligibility talk on The View? No way. Hannity talking about it, Trump almost ad nauseum, newspapers covering it, it's all over the web, info about the SS coming up again. All very interesting.
I hope some day 'Natural Born Citizen' gets defined finally by SCOTUS as "Two US born parents have a child on US Soil. Said child is a Natural Born Citizen." There, simple. Why can't they rule on that?
Gary Kreep is quite capable.
Well, I vote we SELL California to the Chinese!
Go, Orly!! She is amazing.
A National Embarrassment
He bamboozled millions... gave us the old 'okee doke.
Maybe Trump got word this was moving forward and got out in front.
Oddly, sometimes the 9th surprises EVERYONE. Their last big ruling was to essentially "incorporate" the USSC ruling on the Second Amendment within it's jurisdiction.
Was the the McDonald case?...well, something about gun shows in the Bay Area.
Still, that the even took this case is a major lift in stature and allows the USSC to hear the appeal without stepping outside normal protocol.
I have a question for anyone who can answer this. IF the 9th ciruit, (see tagline,) rules on this, for or against, doesn’t this mean that the Supreme Court will have to hear it if it is appealed, or can they just refuse to hear it...again.
Americans were prohibited from traveling to Pakistan at that time. The fact Obama visited the country shows he was traveling using the passport of another nation. Likely it was Indonesian as his step father listed him as a citizen of that nation on the school registry.
Btw, Indonesia did NOT allow dual citizenship. Stanley Ann and Barry would have to have renounced U.S. Citizenship to live there. That’s why, with help of Bill Ayers most likely, Zero had to invent the new identity here in the U.S. Or with the help of his grandfather who worked for the CIA under the front of a furniture company.
USSC doesn’t have to hear anything they don’t want to. They can let the 9th Circuit decision stand, whatever it is.
One of the eligibility cases sites common law that has a different view. They tossed it in but booted the case on the issue of no standing.
This case from 2008, Judge Carter's case, thought to be dead is being revived by the 9th Circus. Something I'd say rarely happens...if ever.
9th circuit?
9th circuit, you say?
Oh, the suspense is killing me.[/s]
Me, too.
“Para 29: In 1981-1982 Pakistan was ruled by a ruthless radical Muslim leader general Zia Ul Hac, who came to power as a result of a military coup, announced himself as a Chief Martial Law Administrator and ruled the country via the system of iron fist terror. Supreme court of Pakistan, apparently afraid for their lives found such rule to be acceptable due to a “necessity” doctrine.”
Why that is odd, considering that in 1981 the Reagan Administration approved the sale 34 of F-16’s to Pakistan.
“But the election of Ronald Reagan as president of the United States in 1980 would change that. Reagan, a Republican who rejected the previous administration’s strategy of détente and would later order a massive buildup of the U.S. military, approved the sale of F-16s to Pakistan shortly after he entered the Oval Office in 1981. That year, the U.S. government agreed to sell 34 General Dynamics F-16A and 12 F-16B “Fighting Falcon” aircraft to the Pakistan Air Force. The jets were delivered under the “Peace Gate” foreign military sales program – the first six were delivered in 1983 under “Peace Gate I,” and the remaining 34 arrived over the next three years, under the “Peace Gate II” program.”
“Americans were prohibited from traveling to Pakistan at that time.”
That is complete nonsense.
VERY interesting!
If it's such a rare thing, I wonder why it's happening... now?
9th Circus = fix is in.
Well... I don’t have much hope from the 9th...
That being said, from another thread I posted on:
Yo, Bill O’Reily, explain how a man born under the British Nationality Act of 1948 can be a Natural born Citizen of the US. what law is that? Answer: THERE IS NONE!! It isn’t possible.
Natural Born citizenship DOES NOT mean born in the united states. It means being born under the SOLE JURISDICTION of the United States!!
Yea, two parents that are citizens and born here is SOLE JURISDICTION - no other nation involved is there?
It isn’t rocket science or theoretical physics for Heavens sake!! It isn’t that hard to get!!!!!! For the love of peat.... People are SO STUPID nowadays!!! It’s a simple concept!
Oh my goodness, See the link at post number 10.,,,,Soebarkah????
“11. Recently released passport records of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, show that Obama was listed in her passport under a name Soebarkah. Exhibit 6”
Except that the Supremes will probably do something stupid like rule that anyone born on US soil-no matter if their parents are only here for 5 minutes before birth- is automatically a US citizen....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.