Posted on 04/08/2011 12:37:45 PM PDT by rface
At that point in time, she did not need to be able to count....
I am old, but she was pleasant on the eyes.
There have to be better places to go...
LMAO......this is the way to stop the fraud. The dems won’t know how many votes they need to find in order for their stooge to go over the top. They thought their math was just right.
SUCKERS
My wife’s hotter. And I can touch her.
Would they do this same probe of the counting process if the Dems had won?
accident or NOT - The voters had their say.....and the RATs have to cry.....or riot or whatever RATs do when they lose
They are freaking over at Kos with supposed experts saying that Access always saves, you don’t actually hit “save” so she’s lying. They miss that she was importing Excel spreadsheets into Access. It’s easy to screw that up and not have the data added to the database.
Of course the big question is why in this day and age is a manual process using Access and Excel being used to count votes?
Fixed it.
Doug La Follette, Secretary of State of Wisconsin is a [DEMOCRAT]. This is the guy that will certify the results of the election. Any WI FReepers know anything about this guy?
I know that strategy.....show her your post....and see what happens next :)
Who cares what the loser has to say. Certify Justice Prosser now.
“misplaced and then found some 14,000 votes that upended the contest”
That is a lie, there weren’t any misplaced votes, there weren’t any found votes.
The votes weren’t reported, period.
That sounds like what the dimocRat are saying.
I tend to take this at face value. Ballots were originally not counted, the discrepancy was found, and the count was corrected.
Nope, not her.
MISS USA 2006, Tara Elizabeth Conner.That info is all embedded in the 'EXIF/IPTC' data.Caption: Miss Kentucky Tara Elizabeth Conner, 20, competes in the swimsuit contest of the Miss USA 2006 pageant Friday, April 21, 2006 in Baltimore. Conner won the pageant. The new titleholder will compete July 23 in the Miss Universe competition in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Chris Gardner)
(Every digital image has that 'EXIF' *stuff*. Including the Photographer, Camera make-model, lens settings and the Copyright holder, etc, ad infinitum. You find it with an 'EXIF Viewer')
... and the canvassing confirmed her vote total. End of story. Game, set, match!!!
I believe La Follette is of the old established family of famous Wisconsin progressives.
Bookmarked as more proof of left wing bias
I can save them the time and trouble then. Regardless of how it turns out, voters who supported the winning candidate will have confidence in the results and voters who supported the losing candidate will be convinced there was fraud.
“There have to be better places to go...”
Compared to Madison?
The thing that’s cracking me up is, when their side looked like they had won everyone here was freaking out and whining about a stolen election, bitching about ballot stuffing and trotting out the same retarded canards about dead folks voting- and as soon as it wen the other way posts worded almost exactly the same way appeared over on that other site as well as the predictable pissing and moaning about Diebold
Good grief, this country is a nation of piteous whiners; at least Nixon had some class when the Daley machine stole Illinois.
If you can’t steal as many votes, rig as many machines, bring as many dead back to life and ‘find’ as many ballot boxes as the other side, you’re as useless as a short NBA player or a 120LB defensive lineman in the NFL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.