Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Perverted Politics of the Redgrave Family
Pajamasmedia ^ | 16 May 2011 | Roger Simon and Lionel Chetwynd

Posted on 05/16/2011 6:30:10 PM PDT by CharlyFord

British author Tim Adler's latest book, "House of Redgrave: The Secret Lives of a Theatrical Dynasty", is filled with bombshell revelations about one of Britain's most celebrated acting families. On this week's Poliwood, Roger Simon and Lionel Chetwynd delve into the sordid politics to which Vanessa Redgrave and her brother Corin were dedicated. How did these children of privilege come to think of themselves as leaders of the working class? And why did they embrace the leader of the Workers Revolutionary Party even after he admitted to having "red sex slaves"?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: british; communism; hollywood; israel; pollywood; redgrave; sex
The depth of our ruling class's arrogance and perversion never ceases to amaze me!
1 posted on 05/16/2011 6:30:12 PM PDT by CharlyFord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

bookmark


2 posted on 05/16/2011 6:48:16 PM PDT by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Given the depravity of their family life, it’s a wonder they didn’t all commit suicide >>>

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1384460/Cursed-legacy-Vanessa-Redgrave.html


3 posted on 05/16/2011 6:49:24 PM PDT by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Because they were nice-looking dumb bells?


4 posted on 05/16/2011 6:49:27 PM PDT by La Lydia ("California: When the parasites outnumber the hosts, it's all over.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

I worked with Vanessa in the early 90s and she was a class act....ate all her meals with “stars” and “extras”. She must have really needed the money because her salary was $30,000. But, I couldn’t disagree with more with her politics.

But the hypocracy of Hollywood is just as bad. The Jewish film makers hired her knowing she was an anti-semite.


5 posted on 05/16/2011 6:54:06 PM PDT by Terry Mross (Only a SECOND party will get my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Their stupidity amazes me. How stupid do you have to be to embrace slavery?


6 posted on 05/16/2011 7:05:08 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Whoever claimed actors were intelligent?


7 posted on 05/16/2011 7:12:00 PM PDT by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robwin
Whoever claimed actors were intelligent?

Actors and actresses... and the news media.

Should tell you something, no?

8 posted on 05/16/2011 7:26:56 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|http://pure-gas.org|Must be a day for changing taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

The British version of the Fonda punks.


9 posted on 05/16/2011 7:30:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islamophobia: The fear of offending Muslims because they are prone to violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Henry Fonda was a liberal, but not a communist. Jane is STILL one. Peter is a liberal, but I don’t think he is as whacko as his sister.


10 posted on 05/16/2011 7:39:28 PM PDT by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: boop

Henry Fonda was a liberal? are you sure?


11 posted on 05/16/2011 8:00:13 PM PDT by SPRINK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: boop

Jane is a murdering communist.


12 posted on 05/16/2011 8:22:17 PM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SPRINK

positive.


13 posted on 05/16/2011 8:25:20 PM PDT by DWC (historian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SPRINK
99% sure he was a liberal. Of course he was a pro-American one, as were most "liberals" in Hollywood during the WWII era. I bet he was greatly embarassed by Jane.

Interesting how "liberals" of that era ended up being "conservative" by today's standards. James Cagney, for one. I don't think he really changed his politics, but by the end of his life, he was friends with Reagan and agreed that the democratic party left HIM, not the other way around.

It is laughable when liberals claim that the republican party left them, by becoming too "right wing". If you told FDR that his party would eventually be pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, anti-American, anti-family, anti-Christian, and even anti-Boy Scout, for God's sake, he probably would be sick to his stomach. Today's "republicans" would be considered ultra-leftist by 1930's standards. It's not even arguable that the country as a whole has turned to the liberal side.

14 posted on 05/16/2011 8:30:59 PM PDT by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

Such a sad mixed up family! Their story gives me goosebumps!


15 posted on 05/16/2011 8:31:14 PM PDT by Buddygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

You dont have to be stupid at all. Just confused. And compartmentalise a lot.


16 posted on 05/18/2011 8:37:27 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson