Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott signs bill requiring drug test to receive welfare (Florida Governor Rick Scott)
Tampa Bay Online (Associated Press) ^ | May 31, 2011 | Unknown

Posted on 06/01/2011 6:36:35 AM PDT by CharlyFord

TALLAHASSEE -- People applying for welfare benefits must pay for drug testing under a bill Gov. Rick Scott signed into law today.

If they pass, they'll be reimbursed for the cost of the test. If they don't, they won't receive temporary government assistance. Scott signed the bill in Panama City along with another measure that bans the designer drug MDPV, which is sold as bath salts.

The drug testing bill was a priority for Scott and an issue he campaigned on

(Excerpt) Read more at 2.tbo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: drugs; rickscott; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
This is way overdue! It should have been done years ago (Great Society time maybe).

Needless to say, the libs despise Gov. Rick Scott. He gets bad press on the front page of almost ever edition of the Sunday Tallahassee Democrat.

1 posted on 06/01/2011 6:36:41 AM PDT by CharlyFord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

wow!

common sense is starting to leak through into our political system!

this should be the norm in every state in the US


2 posted on 06/01/2011 6:38:56 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

How about charging parents of failed students the cost of their education.

Such students would be at higher risk of needing welfare in the future and this would offset the cost.

Sort of like taxing tobacco since smokers are at higher risk of needing medical services in the future.

Yes, this is sarc.

Nevertheless, the best way to deal w/welfare is to end welfare and let charities do it.


3 posted on 06/01/2011 6:41:31 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

That’s going to save a lot of tax payer money. Terrific, all states need to follow.


4 posted on 06/01/2011 6:42:04 AM PDT by Harley (Will Rogers never met Harry Reid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Way to go Rick!


5 posted on 06/01/2011 6:44:42 AM PDT by mojitojoe ( 1400 years of existence & Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Very smart and hard to argue against. Why should taxpayers subsidize dangerous drug use?


6 posted on 06/01/2011 6:44:55 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

I guess this was done in another state but was overturned because it was unconstitutional. Hope it sticks...great law. I am LOVING this governor...


7 posted on 06/01/2011 6:45:25 AM PDT by Fawn (No--bama 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

This is pure common sense - which is why it will drive the Demoloonies absolutely bat s**t crazy insane.


8 posted on 06/01/2011 6:46:45 AM PDT by fwdude (Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Nice work, Mr. Governor!


9 posted on 06/01/2011 6:47:01 AM PDT by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1
end welfare and let charities do it.

but how does that make libs feel good without actually sacrificing anything?

And how does that give the elites any power?

I just don't get it! .... (is it really needed? /sarc)

10 posted on 06/01/2011 6:47:25 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

I’m sick of drug testing being good enough for our military but not good enough for parasites.


11 posted on 06/01/2011 6:47:32 AM PDT by TSgt ("Some folks just need killin'" - Karl Childers (Sling Blade 1996))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Look for this law to be challenged in court. Violation of civil rights or some such. *Sigh*


12 posted on 06/01/2011 6:47:56 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Jeez, the welfare folks are going to have to shop around for the states with the most desirable welfare programs.


13 posted on 06/01/2011 6:48:21 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

10 days until some liberal judge rules it unconstitutional
:(


14 posted on 06/01/2011 6:48:45 AM PDT by MNDude (so that's what they meant by Carter's second term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Now it’s time to apply this rule to ALL on are on the government’s teat, including office-holders.


15 posted on 06/01/2011 6:49:35 AM PDT by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

are they going to do random tests while on welfare..if not it will fail...they will be clean when they apply..

The law is expected to be quickly challenged. The Florida chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union issued a release criticizing it and noting that a previous attempt to test welfare recipients for drugs in Michigan was ruled unconstitutional.

“The wasteful program created by this law subjects Floridians who are impacted by the economic downturn, as well as their families, to a humiliating search of their urine and body fluids without cause or even suspicion of drug abuse,” said Howard Simon, executive director of the ACLU of Florida. “Searching the bodily fluids of those in need of assistance is a scientifically, fiscally, and constitutionally unsound policy. Today, that unsound policy is Florida law.”


16 posted on 06/01/2011 6:51:50 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Don’t get your hopes up.

“Michigan is the only state to attempt to impose drug testing of welfare recipients – a policy that was struck down as unconstitutional in 2003. The ACLU challenged the mandatory drug testing program as unconstitutional, arguing that drug testing of welfare recipients violates the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches. The case, Marchwinski v. Howard, concluded when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld a lower court’s decision striking down the policy as unconstitutional.[16]”

http://www.aclu.org/drug-law-reform/drug-testing-public-assistance-recipients-condition-eligibility


17 posted on 06/01/2011 6:52:04 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: umgud
Jeez, the welfare folks are going to have to shop around for the states with the most desirable welfare programs.

I understand if they want sun, sand, and welfare while smoking pot, there is a State on the West Coast that will let them live there for free.

18 posted on 06/01/2011 6:54:29 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
Jeez, the welfare folks are going to have to shop around for the states with the most desirable welfare programs.

Hee! Hee! Hee! Hee!

10 days until some liberal judge rules it unconstitutional

Won't take that long, trust me!

19 posted on 06/01/2011 6:55:29 AM PDT by CharlyFord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Expect a mass migration to California, then.


20 posted on 06/01/2011 6:55:43 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson