Posted on 08/05/2011 9:58:30 PM PDT by STARWISE
A move to change the way America elects its president got a clear thumbs down in a vote by members of the Republican National Committee on Friday.
A resolution opposing the National Popular Vote initiative won support of every voting RNC member but one who voted "present" instead of "yes."
*snip*
The initiative has been gaining momentum in state legislatures at what for opponents is an alarming rate, with Republican lawmakers being told top officials of the RNC support it.
Members' emotion against abandoning the electoral college was running so high that dozens of members lined up behind two microphones to give individual 10-minute impassioned arguments against the initiative.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
However, the current NPV movement is such that the individual state's method of choosing its electors only changes when enough states join the compact totaling 270 electoral votes.
As I've said before in past threads, if a state chooses to award its electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote REGARDLESS of how many other states join the compact, more power to them -- it's their plenary right as you indicate. Those states should begin doing so in 2012 without waiting for other states.
It is only when they make it contingent on other states joining the compact that things change. At that point, in my opinion it becomes a compact between states requiring Congressional approval.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.