Skip to comments.
Ron Paul censures US policy on Iran (From Iran's Press TV)
Press TV, Iran ^
Posted on 08/21/2011 3:23:27 PM PDT by mnehring
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Iran has found an ally.
1
posted on
08/21/2011 3:23:35 PM PDT
by
mnehring
To: mnehring
2
posted on
08/21/2011 3:29:26 PM PDT
by
Mmogamer
(I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
To: mnehring
Look at the comments.
Ron Paul’s is Iran’s useful idiot now.
3
posted on
08/21/2011 3:29:46 PM PDT
by
Winstons Julia
(when liberals rant, it's called free speech; when conservatives vent, it's called hate speech.)
To: mnehring
Now the Iranians are using this dope Paul as a propaganda tool. Swell. I'm sure the Paulites will be filing in here shortly to defend this whacked out loser as a Patriot for this.
4
posted on
08/21/2011 3:29:52 PM PDT
by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: mnehring
Ron Paul is as goofy as a two peckered billy goat....
To: mnehring
or Perry and Romney have......
6
posted on
08/21/2011 3:30:01 PM PDT
by
eartick
(Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
To: mnehring
the reasons behind the tensions between Washington and Tehran go far back. "The Mahdi fell down that well." Said Paul
"We should, instead of sanctioning, help to pull the Mahdi up!"
Ron Paul, the gynecologist with the rope ladder.
Yay him.
7
posted on
08/21/2011 3:30:30 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(The kinder, gentler version...)
To: mnehring
To: Lazlo in PA
I just loved the comments. The ones from Iranians are precious. Because of Ron Paul indicting the USA, they have conveniently forgotten all the historically crappy actions of their government in favor of a new attitude that anyone but Paul will bomb them and they must get a nuke.
9
posted on
08/21/2011 3:32:54 PM PDT
by
Winstons Julia
(when liberals rant, it's called free speech; when conservatives vent, it's called hate speech.)
To: mnehring
And this treasonous lunatic wants to be president? Pfffft.
10
posted on
08/21/2011 3:34:07 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
To: Winstons Julia
I just blew through the comments. They read like the Conspiracy Kooks Guide to America. Totally mindless garbage. Paul is a dangerous man and should be nowhere near the Oval Office.
11
posted on
08/21/2011 3:37:47 PM PDT
by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Winstons Julia
A lot of Paulbots in the comments section.
12
posted on
08/21/2011 3:38:46 PM PDT
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: eartick
...not provided ammunition for our enemies.
13
posted on
08/21/2011 3:38:48 PM PDT
by
mnehring
To: mnehring
Thanks for posting something that BEGS for my new analogy:
Ron Paul is nuttier than a port-a-potty at a peanut festival!
14
posted on
08/21/2011 3:49:20 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Herman Cain 2012)
To: mnehring
Interesting how many anti-S emetic remarks there are in the comment section. I guess that figures since these commenters also appear to be Paul supporters.
15
posted on
08/21/2011 3:51:49 PM PDT
by
svcw
To: mnehring
I can only help but think of all the fallen uniform men and women in the last 10 years. Without going into politics, just looking at the human factor.
16
posted on
08/21/2011 3:54:33 PM PDT
by
Orange1998
(Obama also inherited AAA credit rating.)
To: Red_Devil 232
Some people are absolutely DEFICIENT when it comes to picking up a history book. Too many of the Paulbots are freakishly isolationist ... and ignore the fact that in history when nations don’t engage in the balance of power on a global level, other nations will step in the fill the void. What were the RUSSIANS doing when we did all these supposedly egregious things back in the days of the frost of the cold war?
Russia gets a pass now ... but we are still expected to somehow atone for what others perceive as “intervention.”
We are “guilty”!
The world has forgiven Germany for the NAZIS ... but Paul’s weaseling about Cold War foreign policy and saying he wouldn’t blame a doomsday cult if they wanted to get a nuclear bomb.
17
posted on
08/21/2011 4:01:12 PM PDT
by
Winstons Julia
(when liberals rant, it's called free speech; when conservatives vent, it's called hate speech.)
To: svcw
The sad thing is, some of those commenters may be Iranians.
And they now think that Paul has just admitted that the USA means them harm and they need the bomb.
18
posted on
08/21/2011 4:02:47 PM PDT
by
Winstons Julia
(when liberals rant, it's called free speech; when conservatives vent, it's called hate speech.)
To: mnehring
Paul is more of a threat to national security than Obama and that is saying something.
19
posted on
08/21/2011 4:02:57 PM PDT
by
Kazan
To: svcw
Interesting how many anti-S emetic remarks there are in the comment section. I guess that figures since these commenters also appear to be Paul supporters. Good point. He is pandering to antisemitic scumbags with these positions.
20
posted on
08/21/2011 4:03:04 PM PDT
by
Kazan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson