Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Draft of Her Story: Sarah Palin Announces What a Future Presidential Campaign May Look Like
Human Events ^ | September 4, 2011 | Tony Lee

Posted on 09/04/2011 10:15:27 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last
To: Nervous Tick

As do her action to specifically reference McCain’s Hobbit sneer that officially put the stamp “Paid In Full” on her past association with him. It just shows that shooting from the hip is not your strong suit.


61 posted on 09/04/2011 11:47:06 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Now, help me out here... what is her position on cronyism, again? Wrong, right?

It's politics FRiend, it's just the way it is no matter how distasteful it may seem.

62 posted on 09/04/2011 11:47:43 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Excellent analysis of the speech. It’s refreshing to hear a concrete policy proposal out of Palin (eliminating the tax on corporations—very bold).


63 posted on 09/04/2011 11:47:49 AM PDT by ishmac (Lady Thatcher:"There are no permanent defeats in politics because there are no permanent victories.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
So if I choose you from among 320 million people to be my running mate and potentially vice president of the United States, you’d back-stab me two years later when I’m running for re-election to the senate? Thanks for the warning!

People are use to being and/or voting for back-stabbers I guess...sigh

64 posted on 09/04/2011 11:47:56 AM PDT by Niteflyr ("The number one goal in life is to parent yourself" Carl Jung)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

I can never figure out why “days of ragers” would want to attack liberal enclaves like NYC and Wash DC.

Wouldn’t it make more sense for them to go to Texas?

/s


65 posted on 09/04/2011 11:49:37 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Her endorsement was a payback for a campaign he was going to win anyway. She no longer owes “the hobbit hater” anything and when she runs, you will see McLame attacking her on a regular basis.


66 posted on 09/04/2011 11:52:24 AM PDT by yellowhorse (6 good horses, 3 good women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I guess they hate rich people. They forget that’s where they get their paycheck. (If they work, that is.)


67 posted on 09/04/2011 11:54:04 AM PDT by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: cumbo78

IIRC, she said she was happy to see McCotter enter the race. I said “Who”?


68 posted on 09/04/2011 11:56:01 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

These are my notes from her speech. They are not as detailed as yours, but are what I got out of the very solid speech she gave.

She has five segments to her plan:

1) Stop expanding out-of-control Government. Enforce the 10th Amendment.

2) Repeal Obamacare. Rein in regulations.

3) No more run-away debt. Prioritize and reform entitlement programs.

4) Become the energy superpower we are capable of being. Link prosperity and energy.

5) Make America the most attractive place on earth to do business. Eliminate all corporate income tax.


69 posted on 09/04/2011 11:57:11 AM PDT by Helen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sarah laid out her platform. If some other candidate has the sense authentically to pick it up and run with it, she will endorse that one and not run, because she won't have to. If the rest of the GOP remains brain-dead, then yes, she will run out of necessity.
70 posted on 09/04/2011 12:01:12 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

[Make no mistake about it, ending corporate taxes is a very, very, smart strategy for destroying the democrat fascists ability to raise campaign funds and to reward the party faithful.]

It is a brilliant stroke I didn’t see coming. Palin is the first to lay out that getting rid of corporate taxes isn’t only an economy booster, but it is clear as a bell that it cleans out the Washington cesspool. At this point, I guess I am part of the pundit crowd (part time) so I should have known about this angle before. This one has legs.


71 posted on 09/04/2011 12:01:22 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (see Surviving Civil War II on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This author calls it "Free Market Populism".

After the speech yesterday I called it "Libertarian Populism".

Either way, it's the Western School of Goldwater. and it IS (l)ibertarian.

72 posted on 09/04/2011 12:06:37 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey
Let me see if I've got this straight. You say:

1) Perry will lose support — because he shot ahead of Romney too quickly.
2) Romney will win the nomination — because he was clever enough to let Perry pull ahead of him too quickly.
3) Palin will run as a 3rd party candidate — because the GOP establishment (the one she promises to clean up or clean out) won't welcome her.

73 posted on 09/04/2011 12:17:15 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bad~Rodeo
I like Sarah, but all this drama on whether she's running or not is BS. It's time she either sh*t or get off the pot.

What is this incessant demand that Sarah Palin should bow to the demands of others? It's her decision to make when to "officially" enter the race. To you it's drama, to me it's strategy. Patience is in short supply around here.

74 posted on 09/04/2011 12:18:47 PM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bad~Rodeo
You are the fourth or fifth person in the last 24 hours who has resorted to toilet imagery regarding Sarah Palin. What is this fixation on toilet functions? You guys just get toilet trained or what? She'll do what she thinks best. You can expect to read about it, when it happens.
75 posted on 09/04/2011 12:19:36 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise
His theory that rule of law, justice, and freedom, are the key ingredients for any society to thrive are dead on

Somehow I think that "theory" has been around a lot longer than someone named McCotter.

76 posted on 09/04/2011 12:24:22 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Adam Smith said essentially the same thing. The potential for corruption is universal and capitalism is not immune.
77 posted on 09/04/2011 12:25:44 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Run Baby, Run!


78 posted on 09/04/2011 12:25:56 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
I also find the scatological references juvenile at best.

There's another old saying, that comes close to the one we're trying not to repeat: “fish or cut bait”. Sarah is an experienced fisherman. She knows when it's time to fish. Meanwhile, it seems she thinks the bait still needs tending to.

79 posted on 09/04/2011 12:26:03 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Helen; 2ndDivisionVet
Excellent analysis. Only missed one thing as far as I'm concerened. The point picked up by Hellen: entitlement reforms. This has been dicussed previously on FR, and SP has been accused to be soft on fiscal cuts for not saying right out that it is a question of cut-backs. But it is not, and she explained it clearly yesterday.

I have seen entitlement reforms, and they can be carried through. In 1991 - 94 socialist Sweden decided to change our pay-as-you go public penaion system to a partly funded system ad modum Peter Ferrara (from Cato Institute) and Martin Feldstein. That is, socialist Sweden changed its pension system for a system with its intellectual roots in the libertarian Cato think-tank. Who would have thought that was possible. One person did, and she managed (without much support) to carry it through.

The alternative, which already had been tried, was to let the statists and the socialists take more and more money either from the younger tax-payers and/or from the pensioners. In short entitlement reforms is not just about fiscal probity it is about morals.

Work keeps me from writing much at FR at the moment, but I hope to be able to come back with a fuller story on how the Swedish pension system was reformed.

80 posted on 09/04/2011 12:29:02 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson