Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: buccaneer81

I always thought it interesting that the Democrats never attacked him for his vote against the Civil Rights Act. All they cared about was whether he had ever cheated on his wife.


26 posted on 10/30/2011 5:38:21 PM PDT by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Hoodat

His drinking was a fairly big issue as well. But you’re right on the Civil Rights Act vote.


27 posted on 10/30/2011 6:37:40 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Hoodat

The confirmation hearings for Bork had Chappaquidick Ted, Plagiarist Joe and graft & pork Howard all sitting in judgement.

That was the first time I realized that the struggle involved good versus evil rather than just a clash of opinions.

Bork clearly stood for integrity, reverence for the constitution and truth. Seeing those three slimes arrayed against such a man of obvious character using sophistry and trying to trap Bork showed me for the first time that the bad guys were for real.

Bork was a towering intellect compared to them, he was beyond qualified to represent the constitution. They had to lie to defeat him.


28 posted on 10/30/2011 6:45:12 PM PDT by UnChained (Cain/Bachmann 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson