Skip to comments.
CBS: Herman Cain waived confidentiality: accuser's lawyer
CBSNews ^
| November 1, 2011
| Jan Crawford
Posted on 11/01/2011 4:39:35 PM PDT by maggief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
1
posted on
11/01/2011 4:39:37 PM PDT
by
maggief
To: maggief
Cain did not break the confidentiality agreement.
The person that leaked the info to Politico did.
2
posted on
11/01/2011 4:44:11 PM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: maggief
If they waive the confidentiality, do they have to give the money back??
3
posted on
11/01/2011 4:44:26 PM PDT
by
SueRae
(I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
To: maggief
If the National Enquirer gets hold of this can of worms, they may run it for all its worth.
4
posted on
11/01/2011 4:44:46 PM PDT
by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: maggief
...a married federal employee who lives in Maryland,is likely to be a liberal.
5
posted on
11/01/2011 4:45:20 PM PDT
by
Rudder
(The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
To: maggief
Such fine-toothed-comb detail. For a network that couldn’t reference Juanita Broaddrick’s lip, even once.
6
posted on
11/01/2011 4:45:37 PM PDT
by
denydenydeny
(The moment you step into a world of facts, you step into a world of limits. --Chesterton)
To: maggief
"I think the National Restaurant Associaion ought to waive the confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions and let the two women, if they choose to do so, come forward and tell their stories so that it can get a complete public airing," Bennett said. And how long would it be and how much money would it take before the stories become nothing like the original events, shaped to become the narrative that the libtard media wants to present and smear Herman Cain with.
7
posted on
11/01/2011 4:46:03 PM PDT
by
Tonytitan
To: maggief
Thought the same thing when I heard Cain speak.
8
posted on
11/01/2011 4:46:21 PM PDT
by
STJPII
To: maggief
You could see this one coming a mile away. So, soon someone will offer one of (or both) thes women enough money and live time to "air" their grievances.
They will come out and try and refute everything Cain has said.
But the libs dont't get it.
They are preaching into and yelling into an almost empty echo chamber...theoir own voices coming back at them and not much more. The people who matter have already decided and are rallying to Cain's side and pouring more money into his campaign because they smell this rat and it stinks to high heaven.
Let 'em keep trying. They're just digging themselves a deeper hole.
9
posted on
11/01/2011 4:46:21 PM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: maggief
Oh boy. Don't like the sound of this "other woman." Hope this thing blows over.
The Right actually expects moral behavior. The Left expects moral behavior too - but only from the Right.
10
posted on
11/01/2011 4:46:43 PM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: Jeff Head
This sure does take me back. I guess they figured that they waited too long in 1991.
11
posted on
11/01/2011 4:47:49 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Illegal aliens collect welfare checks that Americans won't collect)
To: Safrguns
Bingo!
The leftist are VERY aftraid of Herman Cain. They KNOW he can defeat Obama and are throwing everything at him.
To: maggief
Lets say this is the case. Then could the case also be made that this woman is waiving the confidentiality agreement for similar episodes she has had with other companies and organizations?
Does she want to open up that can of worms if we find out she does this with many, if not most of her employers?
13
posted on
11/01/2011 4:49:15 PM PDT
by
mnehring
To: PapaNew
ANY man in a leadership position in corporate America has a large target on his back.
14
posted on
11/01/2011 4:49:29 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: maggief
Cain needs to won up if there’s any to be done, but what about Obama? Is there credible evidence about these allegations of his homosexual behavior and cocaine use in 1999?
15
posted on
11/01/2011 4:49:29 PM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: maggief
As said before Herman may not be a party to the lawsuit so there is no confidentiality to lose.
To: Safrguns
Herman Cain has prevailed over poverty, cancer, racial discrimination, and corporate America.Will he prevail over Big Brother and his ruthless Propaganda Machine?
If not--he is too good for America.
17
posted on
11/01/2011 4:52:31 PM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(A backwoods southern lawyer is a safer trustee for your soul than a Washington politician.)
To: SueRae
The monies are paid with the understanding of a confidentiality agreement. I suspect the lawyer is just trying to get his 15 minutes of fame by even discussing this.
18
posted on
11/01/2011 4:52:31 PM PDT
by
omega4179
(We can't wait! for the end of an error.)
To: maggief
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I present President Cain and the First Lady. Ahhhh, I love the sound of that. God willing...
19
posted on
11/01/2011 4:55:28 PM PDT
by
cubreporter
(Rush Limbaugh... where would our country be without this brilliant man?)
To: omega4179
The monies are paid with the understanding of a confidentiality agreement. I suspect the lawyer is just trying to get his 15 minutes of fame by even discussing this.Perhaps the lawyer should be fined the amount of the settlement whose confidentiality was breached and be debarred from further practice in the legal profession.
20
posted on
11/01/2011 4:55:48 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson