Posted on 11/08/2011 6:11:55 AM PST by justlurking
They hugged each other backstage in a full embrace like old friends.
She grabbed his arm and whispered in his left ear.
She kept talking as he bent to listen, and he kept saying “Uh, huh. Uh, huh.”
Huh?
“I don’t know if what she was giving him was a sucker punch, but he didn’t put his arm down while she was talking to him,” said the Sneed source.
(Excerpt) Read more at suntimes.com ...
If you go to the Sun-Times article you will see that Amy Jacobson is the WIND Co-Host who witnessed the interaction between Bialek and Cain backstage at the TeaCon. She was also interviewed on Glenn Beck this morning where she also gave her opinion as to whether Bialek was lying or telling the truth. Sorry to not have been clearer.
To summarize: Bialek WAS at the event, and Amy Jacobson is the source for the article above detailing what she witnessed when Bialek approached Cain.
I wonder how much the Democrats offered her.
ping
I think he rejected HER and she is getting back at him.
So if Cain and Bialek were together last month at this event, then why did Cain said when he watched the Alred/Bialek presser yesterday, he didn’t have any idea who the woman (Bialek) was? Cain does not sound credible here. Am I missing something?
Cain meets thousands of people on the campaign trail do you think he remembers everyone??
That is not Sharon that is Amy Jacobson, if you click on the link, below the photo it says who is in the photo.
Question: Didn’t Cain know about this photo and Amy being the witness that Sharon was there, hugging Cain? I believe in his press conference he said until yesterday, he had never seen, met this woman before. Did I hear wrong?
If he did say that—I was waiting for one of the news people to ask about the photo and the witness and how could he say he never met her, when this Amy person says Sharon was there...
I think you bring up a good point about the upcoming job interview and how that may have affected the response. Also, I go back to the beginning of that discussion when Beck said he wanted her opinion of Bialek. It was like “Me?...You want me to talk about that?” There seemed a hesitation there; I noted it at the time. Quite possibly all this was running through her mind.
Thanks for the feedback.
That looks more like the woman in the picture. Cain was adamant at his press conference that he had never seen his accuser before. Are they sure that she was at the Tea Party event?
Hi Liberty....my take is blondie is a gamer of whatevver system will give her a free pass..nothing to do with how she ahndles her finances...she’s playing the system time and again so she doesn’t have to pay. Just my opinion.
The point is....her story should be fairly easy to verify...unless hotel records are not kept (and lefties know that) for over a decade.
That’s why ANYone that comes forward this many years later should not be considered credible. They KNOW they have no documentation to refute their bullshit.
I am surprised Alred (sp?) did not have her dress in a less provocative fashion. But I guess they are all just laughing up their sleeves thinking about how they can just make up anything and have the media report it. Disgusting.
This was posted in a local chicago paper, NWI.COM http://www.nwitimes.com/news/national/government-and-politics/chicago-area-woman-accuses-cain-of-bold-sexual-advance/article_22006c30-c2d2-511e-aa10-4c9d46983563.html?mode=comments
(Northwest Indiana, Chicago Metro area) in the comment section from a local who knows Sharon Bialek:
“I know Sharon Bialek, I know her very well. Sharon was the neighbor of a woman I met on Match.Com back in the winter of 2003. Sharon’s son, the son of the woman I met, and my son all played together often. At the time, these women were living at Lake Point Towers in Chicago. Sharon was working for NBC radio marketing and she lost soon her job in a downsizing. As time passed and Sharon remained unemployed, I learned a lot about Sharon Bialek.
I introduced her to an acquantence of mine whose family had just sold their railcar business (think Chicago Heights boxcar manufacturing). Sharon is a 10 from the neck down. Make no mistake about it, this woman in a bikini is an absolute knockout! After I introduced her to this guy and she realized he was a multi millionaire, it didn’t take long till he was her newest boyfriend. You see, Sharon never married her child’s father. Actually, it was more likely the other way around. Her child’s father is a senior executive with Rupert Murdoch’s Newscorp marketing subsidiary. Another rich guy. See the pattern yet?
The only thing I believe about this story was that Sharon knew Herman Cain. Sharon went from marketing job to marketing job and was fired often. She knows how to negotiate to keep getting new jobs. After she lost her job with the radio marketing, she sued them for some kind of discrimination. I do not remember all of the details. I only remember they settled with her.
The one who needs to “come clean” here is Sharon Bialek. I am really surprised that Gloria did not do her total due diligence on this woman. I expect Sharon to be discredited quickly. It does not surprise me nor a couple of people I spoke with tonight whom also know Sharon as well as I do that she is in the national spotlight. It is my opinion that she is a world class gold digger. I imagine she has a big pay day somewhere on her horizon. If that pay day was a Playboy spread, you would see what I mean when I say she is a 10 from the neck down.”
And this post:
“SHE NEEDS THE MONEY! She also wants the attention. This woman filed for bankruptcy twice and wrote off some big debts. Personal experience knows she has been in and out of court to the point where the gatekeepers probably know her first name. She’s a “full time mom” for her 13 year old son. Right. The boy’s father has a big time job so he pays big child support. He does not pay alimony since they were never married. I met the father and he is a real nice guy who admits he let let gluttony get in the way of common sense.
My opinion is he would be the first to tell you the old saying “Your actions speak so loudly that I cannot hear what you say” fits Sharon Bialek. I imagine the father is pretty angry about what this is doing to their son. This woman has Donald Trump’s ego on steroids when it comes to attention opportunities or she smells money and she is not afraid to use her assets to get what she wants. I would believe the accuser is really the accused!”
No, it wasn’t you that wasn’t being clear. It’s just that I see and hear contradictory things. And part of my problem is I’m only hearing snippets; I’m in the middle of a big project.
So if Bialek WAS at the event, (a) did Cain meet with/speak with her there, and if so, (b) why did he say today that he doesn’t know the woman?
Yes, really!
And, one of the other “victims” didn’t like being called a “lovely young lady,” what a joke... I had posted on one of those threads about how I like being called that, any time!
This whole thing has Obama stank all over it
If you go back to the beginning of the post and click on the Sun Times, you will see a larger picture of the two men, the woman and Herman.
Just so happens that the Sun Times says that the woman in the picture is Amy Jacobson!
The woman in the picture is Amy Jacobson. Go back to the begging of the post and click on the Sun Times and you will have a bigger picture AND the name of the woman in the picture - Amy Jacobson.
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.