How Many Victims of Penn State Homosexual Predator Jerry Sandusky Will Think They are ‘Gay’?

Americans For Truth About Homosexuality ^ | November 10, 2011 | Peter LaBarbera

[Diago]

News Release
Americans For Truth About Homosexuality

November 10, 2011; Contact: Peter LaBarbera: americansfortruth@gmail.com

CHICAGO—The discovery that former Penn State University defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky has been molesting boys as young as 10 years old – and that university officials including head coach Joe Paterno did not do more to apprehend this predator – has shocked America. Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH), said the scandal exposes the continuing problem of homosexual predators in society. He offers the following observations related to the PSU scandal:

• Many openly homosexual (“gay”) men, like CNN anchor Don Lemon, were molested as boys or experienced abnormally early sexualization. Yet many of these same men do NOT see their boyhood victimization at the hands of homosexual male predators as causing their homosexuality. (This is due partly to the success of the modern “gay” movement that falsely ascribes “gayness” to a person’s (innate) identity, and emphasizes the ambiguous notion of “sexual orientation” as opposed to behavior that is sinful, destructive and changeable.)
• Thus, how many boy victims of homosexual predator Sandusky will end up believing that being homosexual (“gay”) is “who they are”? How many will struggle with sexual identity issues? And how many will be told by LGBT advocates and liberal-minded people just to “accept being gay” as “who they are” because they were “born that way”?

• Because the media and academia have largely become apologists for the modern homosexualist movement, they downplay or ignore obvious causative factors in the formation of “gay” identity – including pederastic molestation. CNN’s Lemon is a case in point: he is now an “out gay” celebrity, yet few question the absurdity of him not associating the molestation of his youth with his later embrace of homosexuality as a positive identity.
• There IS a long history connecting homosexuality to pederasty, and a disproportionate link between homosexuality and pedophilia: why else would so many child molestation victims be boys when only 1-3 percent of the population is homosexual? Since cases of women molesting boys remain rare, if homosexuality were not such a strong factor, nearly all of pedophile victims should be girls, which is far from the case.
• Sandusky is married but obviously has a homosexuality (perversion) problem. Yet pro-“gay” liberals will deny any linkage between homosexuality and Sandusky’s rape/seduction of boys. In fact, after news of the Penn State scandal came to light, “gay” activists stressed that Sandusky is married and that most pedophile cases involve “straight, married men.” However, behavior is what matters – not a person’s marital status or self-described “sexual orientation.” Sandusky was married but was he really “straight” (sexually or morally)? Some inner demons or life traumas – probably in his own youth – caused him to lust for boys, wrecking untold misery in the lives of his victims. Behavior is the issue, and this was a case of a serial homosexual predator raping boys.

[momtothree]

When I was younger and learned about how cruel ancient civilizations could be (child sacrifice, etc), I would think “thank goodness we have evolved”. I don’t believe that anymore. Ancient civilizations would sacrifice babies, virgins, slaves... in ignorance to a god for hopes of safety, better crops etc. We know the damage being done. We know that a fetus has a beating heart. We know that children suffer horribly (and for the rest of their lives) as a result of physical abuse/sexual abuse. The only true difference is we now seem to focus entirely on the needs of the perpetrator. We now label babies as “baggage” and children are offered to sickos each and every day. The media exploits this as well. Watch all sorts of movies/television shows and what do you see? Children being shown as “sexual” and teen characters taking care of their “little problem” by a simple visit to the abortion clinic. Nope, Butterdezillion, we haven’t evolved as a species at all.

[butterdezillion]

A pedophile is one who sexualizes/objectifies a non-sexual child. A pederast likes the young sexual person who is first starting to figure out what it’s all about. So the pederast is one who “persuades” the malleable person to be gay.

And as long as our society is offering hetero and homo as equally valid persuasions, the pederast’s job is made easy. As long as younger and younger ages are considered to have sexual “rights”, desires, etc, the pederast’s job is made easier.

Am I understanding that correctly?

Travis, I have to tell you how much I respect and appreciate you for dealing with this. As you think about your own experience, is there any advice you would have for those of us who deal with boys, teens, and adults who are confused, have been groomed, or who have been sexually violated?

[Reily]

Important points
“Homosexuals can't reproduce, they can only recruit”

Think of this purely biologically, you have an organism through its behavior can't reproduce. And the Human Genome project demonstrated that there is no gay gene in spite of the academic “gay mafia” trying to stack the researcher deck. (And why would anyone think there would be? Where is the evolutionary driver for a gene that prevents the organism from reproducing?) Therefore their numbers through time can only come from two sources, all other things being equal something goes wrong in their psychological development. (Think a Bell Curve of personality/psychology archetypes, with aberrant behavior being the outliers.) & b) Recruiting. I would bet that natural numbers in a) is very small. Therefore the current numbers likely come from b). Particularly since society has dropped the pressure on this form of sociopathic behavior.
Yes I view homosexuality as a sociopathy, usually not overly dysfunctional, the exception of course being pedophilia.

[MuttTheHoople]

That's women. Totally different case. Most women decide to become Lesbians because men disgust them.

[butterdezillion]

One in six. That is obscene. I had no idea it was that common.

[Travis McGee]

I’m not disagreeing with you. Adult female seducers of teenage boys do harm them, compared to the ideal ways to be introduced to heterosexual love and sex.

But at the end of the day, the boys are still on a heterosexual trajectory, with no confusion of their sexual identity.

IMHO the harm is orders of magnitude less than in the case of a sodomite pederast.

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

[Travis McGee]

Got it. I thought you were speaking from the female POV.

[butterdezillion]

My 11-year-old daughter was asking me what was going on at Penn State, that they were talking about when we listened to the NE-Penn State football game. So after the game we had a long talk that covered a lot of different topics. The subject of exploitation was one - and included a discussion of rape, child abuse, and abortion, and how they are interrelated. We also talked about coping mechanisms and how abortive women are both perpetrators and victims - as are (so often) abused children who grow up to abuse their own children, children who are sodomized who go on to sodomize others, etc.

We human beings are so easily trapped. No, we haven’t evolved at all. We are still the same vulnerable, easily-warped people we’ve always been. And the more we try to pretend otherwise, the more the society as a whole is suckered into believing our own lies and justifications.

[Travis McGee]

It’s disgusting and demoralizing for our troops to be told to “look the other way” in Afghanistan (and other ME/islamic countries) when they see grown men grooming and raping “dancing boys.”

What a lesson to our troops, in our now “gay-friendly” military.

Frankly, I would not want my sons to join the military now. The barracks will be full of predatory sodomite NCOs, and the young recruits will have no way to fight back.

[Travis McGee]

Amen. But don’t worry about me in regards to Joe in Texas. I could not care less. I am on this crusade for life, and pro-homosexuals only harden my resolve to resist their campaign to corrupt boys.

[Travis McGee]

Close enough. The key point is that the sodomites HATE when the term “pederast” is used, because it means there is a blur between “normal” (sic) adult homosexuality, and “deviant” pedophilia.

Pederasts are the bridge. Adult homosexuals overtly decry the Sanduskies while secretly applauding them, for having the “courage” (in terms of risking prison) to corrupt young boys, and send them on a trajectory where many will be available for homosexual sex later on.

The pederasts feed this sick, evil cyle, to the benefit of adult homosexuals.

That’s why I always distinguish between pedophiles, who are already condemned by one and all, and pederasts, who feed and sustain the homosexual pipeline with new victims.

[Travis McGee]

As a species I think we are very blessed to have benefited from over 2,000 years of moral ascendancy.

But just let the power go out for a year or two, and we will be right back in the jungle of warlords, chattel slavery, sexual slavery, torture for pleasure, etc.

It's a very thin thread holding our civilization intact.

[Travis McGee]

You understand it perfectly now.

The pederast is the necessary bridge between adult homosexuals and vulnerable adolescent males.

That's why the sodomites want the word expunged.

[Travis McGee]

I agree, and it’s time to make that case, and not just follow the PC claptrap about homosexual genetic destiny.

We must resist the sodomite agenda, to save our boys, and Western society.

Or, we can follow the Road to Sodom, and that is not a happy road.

[JoeFromSidney]

Lots of boys are very mixed up and unsure at that age

Lots of boys at that age are confused by their sexuality. The homosexual recruiters try to claim these boys are confused about their sexuality. It's fraudulent from the word go.

[dennisw]

I suspect that the boys that Sandusky targeted from all of those in that organization already exhibited effeminate characteristics.

I'll bet he also pursued boys who were fence sitters and now he has turned them gay for life unless they get some high quality intervention. Fence sitters will go the way the dominant culture pushes them which is towards normal heterosexuality....unless a scumbag like Sandusky comes along and pushes them into the gay way via sex

The physical act of a grown man doing this with a boy's rectum is so disgusting and worth hanging him for it

[Travis McGee]

Totally. It’s a scam being run by sodomite predators. The difference is that the social norm has now moved radically toward “gay acceptance,” which is a pederast’s dream.

“Glee” = gay grooming. Period. And the world is all tuned to “Glee’s” frequency now. Shoot, just SAY the word “fag,” and you are excommnunicated from Hollywood.

[Travis McGee]

Yep. There is a reason society kept them in the closet, in a modicum of fear. It was a means of settng boundaries around their behavior, to protect our children.

Now the boundaries are all shattered, and “Glee” type messages are bombarding kids. By the time they matriculate at Predatory Sodomite U, they are putty in the hands of the homosexual profs, TAs and coaches. Their resistance to the homosexual agenda has been brainwashed out of them.

[momtothree]

You are very wise to talk to your daughter about all of this. If she doesn’t hear this talk from you then she has to rely on what she hears at school or the media. I find it amazing how many parents won’t talk to their own kids about these subjects. It is disheartening. We have to prepare them for the world and how to protect themselves. I remember when my son was real little and went to the pediatricians. The doctor examined him and my son started to yell, “BAD TOUCH, BAD TOUCH!!” The doctor was very happy that he knew how to respond even as a little guy.