How Many Victims of Penn State Homosexual Predator Jerry Sandusky Will Think They are ‘Gay’?

Americans For Truth About Homosexuality ^ | November 10, 2011 | Peter LaBarbera

[Diago]

News Release
Americans For Truth About Homosexuality

November 10, 2011; Contact: Peter LaBarbera: americansfortruth@gmail.com

CHICAGO—The discovery that former Penn State University defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky has been molesting boys as young as 10 years old – and that university officials including head coach Joe Paterno did not do more to apprehend this predator – has shocked America. Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH), said the scandal exposes the continuing problem of homosexual predators in society. He offers the following observations related to the PSU scandal:

• Many openly homosexual (“gay”) men, like CNN anchor Don Lemon, were molested as boys or experienced abnormally early sexualization. Yet many of these same men do NOT see their boyhood victimization at the hands of homosexual male predators as causing their homosexuality. (This is due partly to the success of the modern “gay” movement that falsely ascribes “gayness” to a person’s (innate) identity, and emphasizes the ambiguous notion of “sexual orientation” as opposed to behavior that is sinful, destructive and changeable.)
• Thus, how many boy victims of homosexual predator Sandusky will end up believing that being homosexual (“gay”) is “who they are”? How many will struggle with sexual identity issues? And how many will be told by LGBT advocates and liberal-minded people just to “accept being gay” as “who they are” because they were “born that way”?

• Because the media and academia have largely become apologists for the modern homosexualist movement, they downplay or ignore obvious causative factors in the formation of “gay” identity – including pederastic molestation. CNN’s Lemon is a case in point: he is now an “out gay” celebrity, yet few question the absurdity of him not associating the molestation of his youth with his later embrace of homosexuality as a positive identity.
• There IS a long history connecting homosexuality to pederasty, and a disproportionate link between homosexuality and pedophilia: why else would so many child molestation victims be boys when only 1-3 percent of the population is homosexual? Since cases of women molesting boys remain rare, if homosexuality were not such a strong factor, nearly all of pedophile victims should be girls, which is far from the case.
• Sandusky is married but obviously has a homosexuality (perversion) problem. Yet pro-“gay” liberals will deny any linkage between homosexuality and Sandusky’s rape/seduction of boys. In fact, after news of the Penn State scandal came to light, “gay” activists stressed that Sandusky is married and that most pedophile cases involve “straight, married men.” However, behavior is what matters – not a person’s marital status or self-described “sexual orientation.” Sandusky was married but was he really “straight” (sexually or morally)? Some inner demons or life traumas – probably in his own youth – caused him to lust for boys, wrecking untold misery in the lives of his victims. Behavior is the issue, and this was a case of a serial homosexual predator raping boys.

[wintertime]

Perhaps, but at least these teenage boys seduced by women will not have problems with their gender identity.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Probably not, but I haven't seen any articles or studies on the long term emotional, social, sexual identity, and psychological damage done when adult women molest boys.

The point is that the flippant comments found on the “hot teacher” threads are very dismissive of what could be serious damage to a child's life as an adult.

[guitarist]

Only killing babies by abortion could possibly supersede this perversity for being the most horrible thing going on in the country that so many political leaders endorse. Thanks to God for the large block of Republicans, and the small block of Democrats, who have endorsed neither abortion nor sexual perversion.

[yldstrk]

oh yeah, that “effeminate” stuff is garbage.

[Travis McGee]

Wintertime, I can’t tell if you are a man or a woman, but as a man, let me assure you that there is NO COMPARISON between a 25 year old woman seducing a 15 year old boy, and a 50 year old pederastic sodomite grooming, seducing, and raping a ten year old boy.

NONE...WHAT...SO...EVER.

[don-o]

I am sad to see the flippant remarks made when the “hot teacher” articles are posted.

Me too. And that's one of many reasons I never recommend this forum to anyone. There was a time that I did, but the rise of inappropriate content changes that.

Restoring the Republic involves a LOT more than electing the right people. A return to moral clarity is required. It's all well and good to rail on the queers, but celebrating heterosexual lust is to be equally railed against.

[Travis McGee]

Please, learn the distinction between PEDOPHILE and PEDERAST.

Pederasts are a necessary “bridge” for the adult homosexual community, a key link in the grooming process that turns mixed up boys into easy putty for later homosexual overtures.

[wintertime]

At what point would Jerry Sandusky’s behavior be acceptable?

The argument strikes at the heart of the worldview separating liberals from conservatives.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Good question. Good point!

[MuttTheHoople]

Homosexuals are usually the product of weak or non-existent fathers. Ask these homosexuals what their relationship with their father was like....I bet it was either that the dad was working all the time and ignored them, or beat them (that isn’t strength, but weakness), or psychologically abused them (mockery, mind games, etc.). The child didn’t develop the masculine traits needed, and became vulnerable to feelings for men that a lack of a strong father had.

[Travis McGee]

Very much so. I have yet to meet a man who was molested by a women who could be considered well-adjusted. The damage is different from men who are molested by men but it tends to be every bit as significant.

As an adult heterosexual male who was molested by a pederastic sodomite at age 13, I'm calling BS on that, Bunny.

BIG TIME.

[butterdezillion]

The other thing is that these boys didn’t have dads. From what I’ve read, homosexuality can also come from a desire for affection from a dad, which becomes sexualized so that boys look to the sexual arms of an older man because they so crave the non-sexual physical affection from a dad who wasn’t there.

So these boys were probably vulnerable in several ways. And because our society refuses to see homosexuality as a symptom resulting from different causes, these boys will never understand what they’re really longing for. Homosexual relationships will not be able to heal them and they will go from one hurt to another, never understanding the real solution for their hunger.

I say this because I have had to work through my own issues in the same way. My issue wasn’t homosexuality but it was a hunger, and until I came to understand what I was really dealing with, I looked to all the wrong things to satisfy the hunger. It surprised me when a pastor friend suggested that I read a pamphlet about homosexuality, but I was immediately able to recognize that the same dynamics were at work in my own heart and life. Gay people often think they are so different from everybody else, but anybody who has acquired untrue emotional expectations from before they were able to mentally process them deals with the same dynamics.

I hurt for these boys, and I am very, very sad that they will struggle because our society refuses to really understand where homosexuality comes from.

[momtothree]

“... Sandusky targeted from all of those in that organization already exhibited effeminate characteristics...”

I don’t believe so. I do believe he targeted little boys that may have had a history of family instability, behavior problems, or a history of possible prior physical/sexual abuse. Why else start a foundation for troubled boys... easy pickings since no one would believe them or they didn’t have a strong enough family unit around them to see something as wrong. I do believe that a crime like this is probably one of the most underreported ones. Why? Simply put... it carries a lot of stigma and questions NOT posed to little girls who are molested. For example, why didn’t the boy fight? What if he was the “seducer”? Or, “what if he was really gay and just experimenting with an older “lover?” If someone presented those questions to a eight year old girl... most people would slap them. However, many people are perfectly comfortable asking those horrible questions to a little boy. IMHO, children are innocent. Both boys and girls. Any person, male or female, robbing them of that innocence is evil.

[Travis McGee]

My question was about the poster’s assumption that the boys who were molested were “effeminate” or “already leaning that way” before they were victimized by Mr. Sandusky. Without evidence presented, this seems to me to be a “just-so story” invented to support the concept that there is a population of people “pre-set,” as it were, to become practicing homosexuals.

EXACTLY!

[Travis McGee]

See 52.

[SaraJohnson]

Interesting information about pederast versus pedophile!

It explains why when liberals design childrens’ gay sex activities (like gay proms, clubs, seminars, etc.) they target “teens” aged 13 to 19. Given what we know about children and their peer grouping preferences, it is really not natural for 19 year olds to be hanging out with 13 year olds. It’s even wierder for teen boys to socialize with one another around an adult sexual theme. For boys, sex involes girls.

Ofcourse these “teens” and their sexuality are all guided by experienced homo adult child sex activists, which is about the opposite of a role any adults play in normal life. Normal adults do not teens having sex and they did not talk dirty to us.

The “born that way” rather than targeted, traumatized (sexual imprinting), raped and manipulated, that way” is an important PC lie to perverts.

http://www.tc.umn.edu/~parkx032/ISF27.html
Sexual imprinting: “... Imprinting is sudden and permanent.
It seems that we can receive sexual imprinting from a single event.
And even if we might later wish to ‘lose’ that piece of imprinting,
we find that it remains a part of our sexual responses thru-out our lives.

[JoenTX]

Um, that’s utter horsesh!t. Did you convince yourself of that?

My dad was absent for large parts of the year due to his work as I a child growing up. It never lent me to any gay leanings.

On the other hand, two homosexual people that I know personally have married parents who were home everyday and had traditional nuclear family up-bringing. One was a girl who I dated and wanted to seriously marry growing up. She finally had to say something resulting in extreme disappointment for me and her family. She and I are very close friends to this day and I still love her. Always will. But her brain and desires are for other women, not men. I can’t change that and she’s happy the way she is. I have to be happy for her. Her parents and I are still as tight as ever. Call it what you want, but, abuse what never part of the equation.

[blueunicorn6]

Well, that must be the truth then. Every time homosexuality comes up, there’s someone saying, “Yeah, but I know a lot of homosexuals who aren’t that way” or “My brother Bob is a homosexual and that wasn’t how it was with him!” I think there’s more to this Penn State story than what’s being reported.....so far. Look at all those stories that nbc and the new york times and abc run about their outrage over homosexual child abusers. What? There aren’t any? Why this one? Thank you for lumping in the Mormons with child molesters. Sound logic there.

[Incorrigible]

You are correct Tax-Chick that this is an exercise in speculation on my part since I know none of those involved. However, based on 40+ years of empirical evidence, I’m comfortable with such speculation. For whatever reason, I know a lot of gay males; some childhood friends, others children of my friends. A few exhibited very effeminate traits as early as third grade. It was clear to us in grade school, prior to any sexual dawning, that there was at least one boy that preferred playing with girls and girls’ stuff.

More recently, a father nearly had a breakdown as he tried to get his fourth grade son to get over his Wonder Woman obsession. That boy is now a high school freshman and it’s pretty obvious which team he’s going to be playing on.

Predators, by their nature, will go for the weakest victims. That’s not speculation. Starting a foundation for troubled kids is setting a trap with which to catch the type of vulnerable boys that Sandusky was interested in. No shock there. I’m not saying that every organization trying to help troubled youth is a honey pot for homosexual pederasts but these types of organizations do attract homosexual pederasts and why constant vigilance is required to keep them out. Look at all the flack the Boy Scouts continue to receive regarding their policy against gay leaders.

I don’t know how many boys went through the Second Mile organization but I’m certain that a percentage of them were already effete and represented the weakest of the weak. Easy prey for Sandusky.

[momtothree]

Thanks, Travis! This is one of the reasons this case has me so sick to my stomach. (one of many reasons, of course). Some people lose the fact that these boys were LITTLE KIDS. They have suddenly become “little gays” wanting to be raped in a shower. It must be very comforting to some people to believe, “Not my son, he would have fought back or he would have run away”. Every little boy that doesn’t have a Dad around wants adult male attention... not the demented, sick type just average “Dad” stuff. They want to be around someone who can teach them how to fish, how to play a sport, why they should open a door for a woman? This basic and normal need of these little kids made them targets by a sick, demented, evil man who targeted innocent boys for his own pleasure.

[Travis McGee]

That's why we need to push back hard against these pederatstic sodomites, including by calling them out on what they are doing, from “Glee” to Jerry Sandusky to PSU Pres Spanier, who vowed to make his university the most “gay friendly” in America.

Pederasts have always been among us, but formerly they were scorned. Now they run “gay outreach” programs, in order to target and groom the rising cohort of potential homosexual sex partners.

Homosexuals can't reproduce, they can only recruit. We need to be there to spotlight the overt “grooming” that is currently acceptable, but should be roundly condemned.

Just because a child is brainwashed into homo-tolerance, doesn’t mean his or her seduction and gay rape at age 18 is valid or legit. It's just as evil as what Sandusky did, it's just more careful to tread inside the legal lines.

[dhs12345]

I think that it has to do with desensitizing a person to something that is normally repulsive. Also, “imprinting” happens — not unlike an addiction wrt the brain?

To a prepubescent girl or boy, sex is repulsive and disgusting.