Skip to comments.How Many Victims of Penn State Homosexual Predator Jerry Sandusky Will Think They are ‘Gay’?
Posted on 11/13/2011 6:04:45 AM PST by Diago
Americans For Truth About Homosexuality
November 10, 2011; Contact: Peter LaBarbera: email@example.com
CHICAGOThe discovery that former Penn State University defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky has been molesting boys as young as 10 years old and that university officials including head coach Joe Paterno did not do more to apprehend this predator has shocked America. Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH), said the scandal exposes the continuing problem of homosexual predators in society. He offers the following observations related to the PSU scandal:
“... Sandusky targeted from all of those in that organization already exhibited effeminate characteristics...”
I don’t believe so. I do believe he targeted little boys that may have had a history of family instability, behavior problems, or a history of possible prior physical/sexual abuse. Why else start a foundation for troubled boys... easy pickings since no one would believe them or they didn’t have a strong enough family unit around them to see something as wrong. I do believe that a crime like this is probably one of the most underreported ones. Why? Simply put... it carries a lot of stigma and questions NOT posed to little girls who are molested. For example, why didn’t the boy fight? What if he was the “seducer”? Or, “what if he was really gay and just experimenting with an older “lover?” If someone presented those questions to a eight year old girl... most people would slap them. However, many people are perfectly comfortable asking those horrible questions to a little boy. IMHO, children are innocent. Both boys and girls. Any person, male or female, robbing them of that innocence is evil.
Interesting information about pederast versus pedophile!
It explains why when liberals design childrens’ gay sex activities (like gay proms, clubs, seminars, etc.) they target “teens” aged 13 to 19. Given what we know about children and their peer grouping preferences, it is really not natural for 19 year olds to be hanging out with 13 year olds. It’s even wierder for teen boys to socialize with one another around an adult sexual theme. For boys, sex involes girls.
Ofcourse these “teens” and their sexuality are all guided by experienced homo adult child sex activists, which is about the opposite of a role any adults play in normal life. Normal adults do not teens having sex and they did not talk dirty to us.
The “born that way” rather than targeted, traumatized (sexual imprinting), raped and manipulated, that way” is an important PC lie to perverts.
Sexual imprinting: “... Imprinting is sudden and permanent.
It seems that we can receive sexual imprinting from a single event.
And even if we might later wish to lose that piece of imprinting,
we find that it remains a part of our sexual responses thru-out our lives.
Um, that’s utter horsesh!t. Did you convince yourself of that?
My dad was absent for large parts of the year due to his work as I a child growing up. It never lent me to any gay leanings.
On the other hand, two homosexual people that I know personally have married parents who were home everyday and had traditional nuclear family up-bringing. One was a girl who I dated and wanted to seriously marry growing up. She finally had to say something resulting in extreme disappointment for me and her family. She and I are very close friends to this day and I still love her. Always will. But her brain and desires are for other women, not men. I can’t change that and she’s happy the way she is. I have to be happy for her. Her parents and I are still as tight as ever. Call it what you want, but, abuse what never part of the equation.
Well, that must be the truth then. Every time homosexuality comes up, there’s someone saying, “Yeah, but I know a lot of homosexuals who aren’t that way” or “My brother Bob is a homosexual and that wasn’t how it was with him!” I think there’s more to this Penn State story than what’s being reported.....so far. Look at all those stories that nbc and the new york times and abc run about their outrage over homosexual child abusers. What? There aren’t any? Why this one? Thank you for lumping in the Mormons with child molesters. Sound logic there.
You are correct Tax-Chick that this is an exercise in speculation on my part since I know none of those involved. However, based on 40+ years of empirical evidence, I’m comfortable with such speculation. For whatever reason, I know a lot of gay males; some childhood friends, others children of my friends. A few exhibited very effeminate traits as early as third grade. It was clear to us in grade school, prior to any sexual dawning, that there was at least one boy that preferred playing with girls and girls’ stuff.
More recently, a father nearly had a breakdown as he tried to get his fourth grade son to get over his Wonder Woman obsession. That boy is now a high school freshman and it’s pretty obvious which team he’s going to be playing on.
Predators, by their nature, will go for the weakest victims. That’s not speculation. Starting a foundation for troubled kids is setting a trap with which to catch the type of vulnerable boys that Sandusky was interested in. No shock there. I’m not saying that every organization trying to help troubled youth is a honey pot for homosexual pederasts but these types of organizations do attract homosexual pederasts and why constant vigilance is required to keep them out. Look at all the flack the Boy Scouts continue to receive regarding their policy against gay leaders.
I don’t know how many boys went through the Second Mile organization but I’m certain that a percentage of them were already effete and represented the weakest of the weak. Easy prey for Sandusky.
Thanks, Travis! This is one of the reasons this case has me so sick to my stomach. (one of many reasons, of course). Some people lose the fact that these boys were LITTLE KIDS. They have suddenly become “little gays” wanting to be raped in a shower. It must be very comforting to some people to believe, “Not my son, he would have fought back or he would have run away”. Every little boy that doesn’t have a Dad around wants adult male attention... not the demented, sick type just average “Dad” stuff. They want to be around someone who can teach them how to fish, how to play a sport, why they should open a door for a woman? This basic and normal need of these little kids made them targets by a sick, demented, evil man who targeted innocent boys for his own pleasure.
Pederasts have always been among us, but formerly they were scorned. Now they run “gay outreach” programs, in order to target and groom the rising cohort of potential homosexual sex partners.
Homosexuals can't reproduce, they can only recruit. We need to be there to spotlight the overt “grooming” that is currently acceptable, but should be roundly condemned.
Just because a child is brainwashed into homo-tolerance, doesn’t mean his or her seduction and gay rape at age 18 is valid or legit. It's just as evil as what Sandusky did, it's just more careful to tread inside the legal lines.
To a prepubescent girl or boy, sex is repulsive and disgusting.
Excellent question. THE point here. The elephant in the room no one wants to speak of in plain language.
The answer is, of course, NEVER, IF you have morals. If you are of the ‘its all good’ mindset then the answer is ___ is more important than sex, of any kind!
IMO- there are only two sides to this sick mess.
The Stand Up crowd, and the Bend Over crowd.
The people who defend the victims and those who defend the victimizers.
If you defend the victimizers- in any way- you’re a Butt Buddy. A ‘receiver’, a ‘pitcher’ or both.
Pick a side.
Live with the label.
You can’t be that thick.
Not all pedophiles and child molesters are gay. Not all fundamental LDS-types are pedophiles. What we’re talking about here is the casting with a broad brush. Most definitely, some of each are, but many of each definitely are not.
You cannot say that any one type of sexual deviancy is a product of a certain religion or political thinking or whatever. There are plenty, plenty, of good “Christian” males victimizing underage girls in this country and elsewhere. We read about it everyday. Not every Muslim or person raised in a Muslim country has some undying thirst for young boys.
What if Sandusky had been doing this with underage girls? You don’t think that this is happening RIGHT NOW in this country? You’re dead stupid if not.
Wake the Hell up and join reality with the rest of us, please....
Yes, yes, yes.
And we heterosexual men can’t hope for women to save us on this one. We need to be the ones to push back against the sodomite agenda.
I weep for the kids enrolling at our thousands of Predatory Sodomte Universities, where everything Sandusky did is lauded and praised, as long as the kids are a day over 18.
And after years of PC grooming (”Glee” etc), they don’t even have the means to resist homosexual overtures.
I for one vow to never again fall for their agenda, for example, by using the term “gay.” From now on, they are HOMOSEXUALS, PREDATORS, PEDERASTS, and SODOMITES.
If we don’t defend our children from them, WHO WILL? Not college presidents like PSU’s “most gay-friendly campus in America” Spanier.
Please learn the difference between PEDERAST and PEDOPHILE.
The difference is crucial to winning this contest for our children.
I agree, Travis! Have you noticed how very few (if any) of the news report/articles written about this case ever mention the word HOMOSEXUAL? I personally haven’t seen one yet. We have read “inappropriate touching” and “child molestation” but the word HOMOSEXUAL is deleted for PC reasons only. Only some FReepers have actually questioned Sandusky’s “so called marriage” to his wife as a farce.
It’s my personal experience. A very real and genuine one. And, you may go to Hell.
It’s the same kind of experience that happens hundreds of times everyday in this country. It’s not molestation. It’s not “the media.” It is however something within people that we can’t explain and thus apply the “deviant” label too as a soft, comfortable, warm excuse to make ourselves feel better about ourselves.
I assume you are an adult. Wise up.
I understand how you feel about the Freepers supporting Paterno. But I assume most are not supporting the homosexual rape of boys rather are ignorant of or reject the cultural norm of imposing Western ethical standards and expectation on institutions and the leaders of those institutions.
So, the conflict here is a rejection of the idea that Paterno had an ethical duty, which goes beyond his legalese duty, to protect other children from being molested in the “charity” by personally exposing Sandusky publically and criminally even as his supervisors decided to cover it up.
The conflict on these threads is the usual culture war theme: amoral humanist culture where there is a void of human soul. Humanists view man and life is purely material and everything else is choices we make to best serve self. Western culture sees man as an ethical being struggling to do the right thing (building and demonstrating character) over self interest (materialism, gain and physical gratification) to protect honor, human innocence, life and well being.
In humanist culture a person’s value is measured in dollars and cents. You are valuable and wonderful if you are successful materially. In western cutlure, value is measured in the demonstration love, honor or character and success is something that results from that state of being.
So to Freepers of western culture, Paterno failed his ethical duty as a leader becuase they did not go the extra mile to wreck Sandusky’s boy sex operation. But to humanists, he took the steps legally required of him and it was not his duty to protect children in a larger sense.
It is the same old, same old.
I have always wondered about this. In the mid 70’s, I worked for a couple whose oldest son was gay and had moved to California. The mom told me an old (and the man was OLD) family acquaintance molested him as a boy and the son actually blamed this as the reason for his being gay. The son died in the late 70’s of an unknown disease, which took him very suddenly. I’ve always believed it was AIDS, which was not yet heard of at that time. No one even went to get his belongings or attend his funeral.
“Please learn the difference between PEDERAST and PEDOPHILE....”
Are you suggesting that there are different, nee explainable, degrees of child molestation? As in a “pederast” is at least culturally explainable while non-cultural contact is pedophilia?
I seriously don’t get your post here.
And I note your intense, violent rejection of reality and the evidence around you.
Are you basing that on projected anger, or experience?
I’m basing my opinion on years of group therapy, where I’ve come to the conclusion that men who were abused by men are on the other-side of the same coin as those of us who were abused by women.
There are different fundamental issues but many problems that are shared across the board: an inability to trust people, the pushing away of people who get too close, nightmares....panic attacks....severe depression....a nagging voice in the back of your head that inevitably asks of almost everyone you meet “What child is this asshole having sex with?”
But, there are big differences....people in your situation tend to develop knee-jerk hatred of - specifically - men. People like me don’t have that anger. We have distrust because men are adults but not because they’re men.
I could go on but, there’s really no point. You’ll have your belief and I’ll have mine.
We are “Brothers In Problems”, though.
Answer yes or no.....do you enjoy killing kittens? If someone disagrees with you, they are “thick”? “Casting with a broad brush”? Ummmm.....you’re out of your league.
I suspect that the boys that Sandusky targeted from all of those in that organization already exhibited effeminate characteristics. Since the organization was for troubled kids, parents likely sent their young boys hoping this all star team would help their sons man up.
But homo rapists, in the mental war they run on a boy, tells the boy that he’s in the predicament of sexual abuse because he’s queer (not manning up). If he was not queer, he would not have allowed the pervert to touch him.
So by accident, you stumbled into the trap the rapists use on their victims to control them with self guilt and shame for what the pervert is doing to them.
Boy sexual grooming and rape is the way homos reproduce.
Boy sexual grooming and rape is the way homos reproduce.
I belong to a group that helps a certain type of "troubled" people many of whom were molested as children. Of the men who were assaulted by homosexual men, most consider themselves homosexual. (Conversely, the women who were raped as a child (by a man) tend to consider themselves either lesbian or bisexual.)
The impact to society of Sandusky's deviancy is huge. There are now dozens(?) of potential predators out there. And if, by the grace of God, they're able to escape that, these men are likely to face a lifetime of emotional, sexual and social problems.
****They want to be around someone who can teach them how to fish, how to play a sport, why they should open a door for a woman?****
It is more important to talk to (and live through example) your kids about right and wrong, why a work ethic is good, how to love your neighbor as God intends, how to have a relationship with Jesus and the Father through the Holy Spirit, how to be fiscally sound...These are the things that make a person whole.
OTOH, I'd hit it.
Most teenage boys are no where near prepared mentally to escape the manipulation and entrapment of adult sexual predators. It is wrong to allow adults to sexually prey upon a teenage person. Adults should be restricted to having consentual sex with other adults and leave the teens alone.
“... If he was not queer, he would not have allowed the pervert to touch him”.
Sandusky and evil people like him use the child’s own body against them. That is why they often appear as a “friend” rather than a monster initially to the child. A man touches the boy and the boy’s body suddenly reacts... ergo, you are a homosexual. The initial touch may be as simply as a hand on the boy’s shoulder, or a simple “high-five”. They are then manipulated into more touching by the offender... If the hand on the shoulder felt okay, then a hand on the knee is the next step. This is why many child molesters use pornography and alcohol/drugs... to weaken the victim and “fool” the body thus taking advantage of the child.
Sex activists are saying amongst themselves that pedophiles are born that way. Having sex with children is their sexual orientation. They will be trying to lower the age of consent soon. They have a treaty at the UN “The rights of a child” which demands children be permitted to have sex with whomever they choose.
On the “born that way” science, I think a queer researcher was caught cooking the books in his “study” during peer review or after the results were examined after publication.
Don’t get me wrong, ResponseAbility. God is extremely important in all of our lives. My point is that many boys are without fathers due to being illegitimate, Dad divorces and isn’t around or Dad dies. Every boy wants a male role model to emulate. Essentially, a Dad is vitally important (yeah, I know... that isn’t PC or what the media tells us). The development of a boy into a man doesn’t just occur naturally. He isn’t a little boy one day and a productive, God fearing, hard working, responsible man without some help or guidance. That is why this case sickens me. Those young boys wanted to know God, be taught responsibility, a work ethic... everything you and I define as “manhood”. That basic need was exploited, manipulated and twisted into something sick and used for evil.
I ran out of that place as fast as I could. Over the years, I wonder if some young, vulnerable, lonely, stupid 18-19 year old kid went in there, that this or some other professor molested.
That old professor pervert was coming onto you and you, fortunately sensed what he was doing and followed your instinct of flight. Imagine what it is like for a boy drilled in school that to reject or resist this kind of grooming behavior is “hate” or “bullying.” They get in big trouble if they are bully haters so they must surpress the natural reaction that you had and that rescued you from a homosexual predator.
That is what they are doing to boys now. Very sad. People don’t understand what it is all about.
I heartily agree. God bless you.
Why is it that liberals want “equal rights” for everyone exept children?The cases handled by liberal judges rarely favor the abused. Why? Is it simply that children can’t vote, so they are not worthy of representation? I would just like to understand why the law does not protect them not just in the womb, but through their entire jouney to adulthood? Some children are blessed with loving parents but those who are not, have no protection at all. very sad.
At that link you will find an abstract for one of the medical studies on the average lifespan of homosexuals. They live twenty years less than normal men.
It is a public health issue that the elite are permitting homo predators to have mental sexual access to boys in public schools. Bottom line is that they are targeting males for an early death and a life of terrible disease.
Thanks for caring about boys and young men like you do. It is such a relief when I find people like you and other Freepers who understand what is happening.
The Boy Scouts should be addressing this homo predator strategy and processes with boys and young men and urge them and their parents to warn others boys and young men without pc spin. Boys need to be given medical studies on homosexuals so they understand the early death and diseases that come with the behaviors.
You can lead a horse to water and they may not drink. But it is cruel to leave the horse to die when you have water available in the name of genicidal political correctness. Knowledge and truth is survival.
It’s like with the Muslims who don’t consider someone who buggers boys to be gay.
I have heard homo predators discuss their science of entraping and manipulating boys amongst themselves, too.
It is unbeleivable. Made me cry for a week. Poor boys don’t stand much of a chance. And few care about them.
Barack was from a dysfunctional family. Met Frank Marshall Davis and then went on to......
You posted what I was going to post.
This pervert didn't touch any rough and tumble all boy young men. He concentrated on the shy, subdued ones. The ones who couldn't throw a baseball or catch a football. He had them to stay late and assist him in the upkeep of the facility.. . . then he'd groom them for rape!
Pederasts are attracted to ADOLESCENTS.
The sodomite lobby wants you to always say PEDOPHILE, implying some vast, gaping gulf between their “normal” adult homosexual behavior, and molesting little children, whom they are not attracted to.
Pederasts are the BRIDGE between adult homosexuals and their next generation of sexual targets. Pederasts do the dangerous work of preparing teen boys for future victimization, which for homosexuals, means a bigger target population of receptive males.
That's why the distinction between pederasts and pedophiles is so important. Homos like to pretend it's black and white: pedophiles are all bad, adult homosexuality is all bad.
But it's not that simple. Pederasts, whether they are priests, profs or coaches, are the gray-area bridge that links homosexuals with their young teen victims, whom they hope will grow up to be homosexual young men, and available to them for sex, after the pederasts have prepared them.
adult homosexuality is all bad.
adult homosexuality is all good.
(Typing too fast.)
Question: are you a female or a male? I assumed from “bunny” that you were a woman.
That is it, distilled in a nut shell.
I have personal knowledge of this. You are correct.
I am so glad we have Joe in Texas to let us know about reality and evidence if sane.