Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Durban climate change conference: Big three of US, China and India agree to cut carbon emissions
Telegraph UK ^ | 12/11/11 | Louise Gray

Posted on 12/11/2011 10:26:57 AM PST by Nachum

Durban - A new deal to "save the planet" will force the world's three biggest emitters the US, China and India to cut carbon emissions for the first time, although scientists fear it will come too late to stop global warming. More than 190 countries managed to finally agree a new climate change deal amid chaotic scenes in the early hours of Sunday morning in Durban, South Africa. (Snip) In the end the wording was decided in an extraordinary 10 minute 'huddle' between the exhausted ministers to decide the fate of future generations.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: change; china; climate; climatechange; climatechangefraud; co2; conference; durban; durbaninsanity; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; india; southafrica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: almcbean

It’s not yet any (proposed) treaty at all, it’s merely a joint declaration to continue working toward a post-Kyoto treaty.

Considering that USA-China-India have never been foolish enough to accept Kyoto-style reductions in emissions, and that there’s no reason to expect them to agree in coming years, this is all mere posturing for the fanatical greens to pretend the dream is still alive.

Granted they still have far far too much influence and propaganda around, but their dream of a post-Kyoto treaty has collapsed along with the CAGW scam.


21 posted on 12/11/2011 12:46:50 PM PST by Enchante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; All

This is total BS. Yesterday AP wrote:

“A U.N. climate conference reached a hard-fought agreement Sunday on a far-reaching program meant to set a new course for the global fight against climate change.

The 194-party conference agreed to start negotiations on a new accord that would ensure that countries will be legally bound to carry out any pledges they make. It would take effect by 2020 at the latest.

The deal doesn’t explicitly compel any nation to take on emissions targets, although most emerging economies have volunteered to curb the growth of their emissions.”

In other words, a hard-fought, far-reaching accord to start negotiations on something to take effect in 2020 and won’t compel emissions targets! Only cost tens of millions of dollars for these useless eaters to meet in the fun and sun to arrive at this momentous “agreement”! AND they can keep on meeting until at least 2020!

Utter and total failure. Absolutely laughable that the media is reporting this as a success. Just chalk that up to another addition to their syntheti alternate reality.


22 posted on 12/11/2011 1:32:03 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Yes, I agree with your take. Also, I just read this blog post which provides quite an interesting description of how the ‘BASIC’ nations thwarted the CAGW fanatics:

“The BASIC Truth About Durban”
Sunday, 11 December 2011 17:05 Philip Stott

The basic truth about Durban, the latest and 17th Feydeau farce passing as serious UN climate talks, is simple: the BASIC countries - Brazil, South Africa, India, and China - played a blinder.

They outwitted comprehensively the ever-zealous, naive, and hypocritical EU to ensure that they achieved their fundamental goals, which were to delay any agreement on a replacement for the failing Kyoto Protocol until at least 2015, and any actual action to cut emissions until at least 2020. And, of course, by then, the plate tectonics of world politics may have altered even more radically, so that further delays will be eminently possible, or the global warming narrative - we can only hope - will have withered away permanently into perennial greenhouse history....

http://thegwpf.org/opinion-pros-a-cons/4532-philip-stott-the-basic-truth-about-durban.html


23 posted on 12/11/2011 1:35:02 PM PST by Enchante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
In the end the wording was decided in an extraordinary 10 minute 'huddle' between the exhausted ministers to decide the fate of future generations.

Oh please.

24 posted on 12/11/2011 1:37:06 PM PST by denydenydeny (The more a system is all about equality in theory the more it's an aristocracy in practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

Sadly, the modern obsession with CO2 started when Margaret Thatcher wanted to break a coal strike in the early 19080s. An old idea that CO2 raised atmospheric temps was dusted off and put into motion by the BBC. There’s nothing to the theory, of course, but the damage is done now.

Oh what a tangled web we weave...


25 posted on 12/11/2011 2:26:31 PM PST by TenthAmendmentChampion (I have a job; therefore I am in the 1%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
So, there's a treaty in which everyone pledges to sign another treaty in four years with actual goals that wouldn't take effect for yet another five. And this is worth touting?

Probably just the indication we need that the global warming movement is collapsing.

26 posted on 12/11/2011 2:42:36 PM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amagi; Berlin_Freeper; Horusra; Darnright; rdl6989; bamahead; Nervous Tick; SteamShovel; ...
Thanx for the ping Amagi & SunkenCiv !

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

27 posted on 12/11/2011 3:21:53 PM PST by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

It’s an alibi for the vanishing of thousands of more jobs — into Africa and rural Asia.


28 posted on 12/11/2011 3:34:30 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Merry Christmas, Happy New Year! May 2013 be even Happier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

did China and India agree to cut emissions or, like that other time, get exempted??


29 posted on 12/11/2011 3:57:23 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

Shhhh, don`t tell the gaia tree hugging marxists farmers LOVE these things:

.
http://www.johnsongas.com/industrial/CO2Gen.asp

.
.


30 posted on 12/11/2011 4:30:44 PM PST by Para-Ord.45 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

China wants developed countries to continue the charade as China is the primary supplier of wind turbines and solar panels as well as providing the rare earth minerals. China is no fool. The idiot and zealot is in the White House.


31 posted on 12/11/2011 8:53:04 PM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
U.N. climate conference approves landmark deal

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

32 posted on 12/11/2011 10:00:17 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

That is a good point. The uninformed/uneducated/mentally slow/abnormally low IQ/average democrat would indeed make that mistake.


33 posted on 12/12/2011 3:12:56 AM PST by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
I've been trying for several years now to figure out just WHEN Carbon-Dioxide became our dire enemy. Trees inhale Carbon and breathe out fresh, lovely Oxygen for us to breathe. Remove Co2 from our atmosphere, and we will have much less Oxygen.

The problem with that logic is that to create the CO2 by burning fossil carbon we are using up oxygen. Either way, whether we create more CO2 or we don't, we will have plenty of oxygen.

34 posted on 12/12/2011 3:53:39 AM PST by palmer (Before reading this post, please send me $2.50)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Just as the Kyoto Protocol was not approved by the U.S. Senate, so this will not be approved.

And anyone who thinks China and India are going to abide by this new agreement are really living in a fantasy world.


35 posted on 12/12/2011 4:26:48 AM PST by Rocky (REPEAL IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

I’ve had it with these moronic, unelected, international climate thieves. Just who the hell so they think they are? I’m burning three old truck tires now in celebration of their stupidity. Black soot offered up to their beloved Gia. I spit on them.


36 posted on 12/12/2011 4:38:16 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

I’ve had it with these moronic, unelected, international climate thieves. Just who the hell so they think they are? I’m burning three old truck tires now in celebration of their stupidity. Black soot offered up to their beloved Gia. I spit on them.


37 posted on 12/12/2011 4:41:30 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
“I’ve been trying for several years now to figure out just WHEN Carbon-Dioxide became our dire enemy. Trees inhale Carbon and breathe out fresh, lovely Oxygen for us to breathe. Remove Co2 from our atmosphere, and we will have much less Oxygen.”

We have been emitting over the last century larger amounts of CO2 and also been carrying out large scale deforestation. So the percentage of CO2 has gone up. Even tiny variations can have catastrophic impacts.

38 posted on 12/12/2011 7:06:37 AM PST by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rocky; GeronL

At the Durban climate exchange US-China-India have only agreed to a voluntary carbon emission reduction target as opposed to a binding target. Which means US-China-India will set their own targets and they will be monitored and held accountable to achieve that target. Only Europe has agreed to a binding carbon emission target.


39 posted on 12/12/2011 7:51:08 AM PST by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson