Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/16/2011 5:30:55 AM PST by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: basil; txhurl

Well, the wife just just bought another 2 / 12 packs on Wednesday. Guess I’ll just have to put them into my stock of incandescent light bulbs we already have horded.


67 posted on 12/16/2011 6:39:38 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
I hope everybody fully appreciates how much this would-be ban has cost the American public. The idiots in Washington ban incandescent light bulbs, even though millions of people REQUIRE these bulbs. (I happen to have dimmers on most of my light switches. The CF bulbs don't work with dimmers.)Of course, no suppliers buy the bulbs, so then the manufacturing lines are shut down, and then probably dismantled.

Suddenly, two weeks before the ban becomes effective, the WIs (Washington Idiots) "see the light", and end the ban. Except, now there are few bulbs in the stores, and no manufacturing capacity to handle the demand.

68 posted on 12/16/2011 6:50:43 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Good news but big deal.They could have stopped all of the ponzi scheme insider trading with they’re fake bill but they didn’t because they would lose money.So they are appeasing us giving us back our old light bulbs when they probably had stock in them when people were buying them up like mad in dollar generals when it was thought they would be banned.


72 posted on 12/16/2011 6:56:24 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Practically speaking what does this mean? We can import them next year?


74 posted on 12/16/2011 6:59:38 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST pick the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

It actually will make no difference.

First, the law has already existed, and manufacturers and stores have already made provisions to meet the law, which takes effect in about 2 weeks. They aren’t going to be able to change their decisions on manufacturing now, or do new orders to replenish stocks.

Second, since the law has not been repealed, stores aren’t likely to take any chances in ramping back up the sales, knowing first that the Obama administration is notorious for ignoring laws, and second that the law could change at any time, since it’s just a matter of funding.

Third, if Obama decides to spend money enforcing the law, courts will allow the law to BE enforced. There could be a separate lawsuit against the administration for misappropriation of funds, but the law itself is still in force, and can still therefore be invoked. There also might not be anything to stop environmental groups from filing lawsuits against companies who are violating the law — I’d have to read the actual legislation to know whether this would be possible.

It is clear however that Obama’s big thing with this bill was to make sure the republicans couldn’t put anything in the bill that would actually help the economy. Obama can’t have republicans fixing the economy since Obama has failed.


75 posted on 12/16/2011 7:03:00 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

The headline is misleading. 100 watt bulbs are still illegal. Undocumented workers are illegal as well. All this bill does is to stop the enforcement of the law.

So if you own a 100 watt bulb you will be an “illegal bulb owner”. But the government will not enforce the law.

So now you can hire an illegal alien to install your illegal light bulb and nobody is going to go to jail.

Cool, huh?


76 posted on 12/16/2011 7:03:24 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
A simple energy savings technique we should use on Congress:

OFF!

84 posted on 12/16/2011 7:26:20 AM PST by SouthTexas (You cannot bargain with the devil, shut the government down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
Bulbs Guy

*sigh of relief*

88 posted on 12/16/2011 7:40:25 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I would still buy the rough service 60, 75 and 100 watt bulbs anyway. If people had to use emergency generators these lamps are more reliable than the supposed 5 year CFL ones.


90 posted on 12/16/2011 7:41:16 AM PST by Eye of Unk (Castigo Cay by Matt Bracken, check it out. And his other works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley; Berlin_Freeper; Genesis defender; golux; proud_yank; Bockscar; grey_whiskers; ...
A random act of sanity.

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

92 posted on 12/16/2011 7:44:50 AM PST by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
"That agreement is tucked inside the massive 1,200-page spending bill..."

It would have been better if those who originally proposed the ban were tarred and feathered and driven out of town....in stead, threatening their votes the EPA brow beat limp backed congressmen to enact this stupid Mercury laced curly light bulb bill, now expensively being dismantled....why didn't these bright lawmen stand up and refuse as one voice to do something so stupid. At least and at last someone is doing something and for that I am grateful.

95 posted on 12/16/2011 7:54:10 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley; All

Thank you Republicans for saving some of our freedom:

Republicans dropped almost all of the policy restrictions they tried to attach to the bill, but won inclusion of the light bulb provision, which prevents the Obama administration from carrying through a 2007 law that would have set energy efficiency standards that effectively made the traditional light bulb obsolete


99 posted on 12/16/2011 8:12:16 AM PST by Democrat_media (China is destroying all our jobs and manufacturing ability. China makes everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I will NOT use those mercury filled pieces of crap!

I will burn candles first.

Where there is a demand, there will be a supply.


100 posted on 12/16/2011 8:28:23 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
energy standards mandated in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 are implemented. It has infuriated conservatives who see the restriction as an infringement on their right to chose how they light their homes and businesses. “Congress should not be "telling anyone how to light their homes, flush their toilets or run their showers...they should be regulating government spending and not cowtowing to the EPA and Go Green crowd!

Going Green is not the end all be all our children are being taught in school. The end of this Mercury laced light bulb saved little energy and harmed the land, i.e., land fills where tons of the 'pest' now reside. Just the motto..Go Green is toxic. Beware!

105 posted on 12/16/2011 9:42:53 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Good news; it’s too bad that Congress had to waste time in the first place even passing this unConstitutional ridiculously stupid law.


106 posted on 12/16/2011 9:44:21 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley; All
Update thread:

Congress suspends light bulb ban FUNDING--Update to original reports of law change

108 posted on 12/16/2011 11:31:45 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson