Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Slumping Gingrich promises sharper counter-punch
Reuters ^ | Tue Dec 20, 2011 | Mark Felsenthal

Posted on 12/20/2011 4:13:51 PM PST by presidio9

Slipping in polls under an onslaught of attacks, Republican presidential contender Newt Gingrich promises to wage a sharper and more aggressive campaign in the final two weeks before Iowa kicks off the party's nominating race.

Gingrich says he will be quicker to respond to attacks and more agile in getting his message across to voters who may have lost faith in him after rivals launched a withering barrage of criticism of his past as a Washington insider.

A 44-stop bus tour in the run-up to the January 3 Iowa caucus, daily calls with supporters to respond to new criticisms and another round of television ads will be cornerstones of the response by Gingrich, who will focus most of his efforts in Iowa for the next two weeks.

"I think a certain amount of drop in polls was to be expected given the amount of negative campaigning that has been going on," said Linda Upmeyer, the Iowa House Republican leader and the state chairwoman of Gingrich's campaign.

"But there are a lot of people out there who have not made up their minds yet," she said. "The challenge is to make sure that people have accurate information, and to get them the facts as quickly as we can."

The question for Gingrich will be whether he has enough time to rebound in the two weeks left to campaign in Iowa or if he has begun a political free-fall that will be hard to stop.

"The problem is he has probably waited too long," said Craig Robinson, former political director for the Iowa Republican Party. "This is the frantic finish. The clock might run out on him."

Gingrich, the former

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; dishonest; pimptheromneyhere; reevaluategingrich; romneydirtytricks; romneyfanpost; smellslikemitt; stealthromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: Paladin2
If you are going to bring up Nazis, you ought
mention the REAL findings regarding the backstabbing Bishop:

“US election 2012: Mitt Romney's life as a poor Mormon missionary in France questioned
Although he spent time in other French cities, for most of 1968, Mr Romney lived in the Mission Home,
a 19th century neoclassical building in the French capital’s chic 16th arrondissement.
…. “I would describe it as a palace”.
Tearful as he described … Romney aides had asked him not to speak publicly …
The building...was bought by the Mormons in 1952,
having been seized by the Nazis during the Second World War.
The Church sold it again..
.it was until recently the embassy of the United Arab Emirates.”


"(The GroundZero Mosque) cleared its final hurdle ….
developers plan to build the $100 million center which will include a mosque.
Since its incipient stages in July 2009, when a Muslim-run real-estate development
company purchased the damaged, vacant building and land where the new center
will be built, the project has sparked controversy and debate.
.... the tattered building that was bought by the Muslim real estate company had
been owned by a subsidiary of Bain Capital, a company Romney founded in 1984.

So it’s OK if his company can profit off the sale of the land ."


“Bain Capital, has cut checks totaling $90,000 to Romney’s operation. “


81 posted on 12/21/2011 4:25:52 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Gingrich has slipped significantly in NH as well. Of course Romney is also down thanks to Huntsman and Paul - and Newt never was ahead of Mitt, so that state is a bit of an anomaly.


82 posted on 12/21/2011 6:34:06 AM PST by erlayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600
You've only been here for a month, so I will forgive you if you haven't learned yet that its always a good policy to Read The (Fine) Thread before posting.

RTFT: Learn it. Know it. Live it.

83 posted on 12/21/2011 10:26:46 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600

Again, RTFT.


84 posted on 12/21/2011 10:28:05 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: erlayman; calex59; nikos1121
Gingrich has slipped significantly in NH as well. Of course Romney is also down thanks to Huntsman and Paul - and Newt never was ahead of Mitt, so that state is a bit of an anomaly.

Again, Gingrich never had any delusions about NH. He barely campaigned there. NH has 12 delegates. SC & FL have 75.

Next up after that are four more caucuses before Michigan, a month later and one of five(!) "home" states for Romney.

85 posted on 12/21/2011 10:36:04 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom
The problem is simple: If not Newt, who?

Rick Santorum is more conservative and more electable.

He's the best choice of what we're stuck with. And he's rising in the polls while Newt is tanking.

86 posted on 12/21/2011 10:37:42 AM PST by Crichton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I would be thrilled to see Santorum make a run, but I can’t see how this would be possible.

Santorum is at 10% in Iowa and rising, per both Rasmussen and PPP, while Newt is at 14%/17% and falling.

Santorum is not perfect, but he's more conservative and more electable than Newt.

When polls have fluctuated wildly throughout the campaign, why do you insist on supporting Newt and attacking supporters of all the conservative candidates as stooges for Romney -- because of a 4%-7% lead over a far better candidate?

87 posted on 12/21/2011 10:49:07 AM PST by Crichton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Crichton
What's suspicious to me (and I speak with no small hint of sardonic irony) is this: Why hasn't Romney yet "tanked?"

Bachmann has, Perry has, Cain has, and now Newt? All the good folks - everyone, in short, except the right one.

88 posted on 12/21/2011 10:52:18 AM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom
Why hasn't Romney yet "tanked?"

Rommey never spiked.

89 posted on 12/21/2011 10:54:41 AM PST by Crichton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Crichton
These spikes have an analogue in the physical world: every action carries an equal and opposite reaction.

BTW I'm completely fine with Rick Santorum. He's gold.

90 posted on 12/21/2011 11:00:32 AM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Crichton
Santorum is not perfect, but he's more conservative and more electable than Newt.

Look, I love the guy, but I can't see how you can seriously make that claim. Santorum's appeal is limited to hard-core conservatives. Rougly 10% of the electorate. He is about as electable as Howard Dean.

And should he win Iowa, what then? Dean won there too. Santorum has put ALL of his effort there. He has done a townhall in every county. Romney is going to win NH regardless. Gingrich is safe in SC, and looks strong in FL.

Winning Iowa will delay the inevitable for a few weeks for Santorum. The best he can do is this election's Huckabee.

91 posted on 12/21/2011 11:37:43 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
If you are supporting none, and attacking Mitt Romney's competition, you are effectively supporting Mitt Romney.

Absolutely true. Even the Ron Paul lunatics are effectively supporting Mitt Romney.

92 posted on 12/21/2011 11:51:02 AM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

He may not have campaigned there but to say that Gingrich is beating Romney in all other polls by double digits is simply false. They are even in a new CNN survey and in Virginia Newt is only five points ahead.


93 posted on 12/21/2011 11:54:10 AM PST by erlayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Look, I love the guy, but I can't see how you can seriously make that claim. Santorum's appeal is limited to hard-core conservatives. Rougly 10% of the electorate. He is about as electable as Howard Dean.

Santorum was repeatedly elected in a left-leaning industrial state until running into the "pro-life" scion and namesake of the sainted Gov. Casey in a Democrat landslide year. He has proven he can appeal to the white working class swing voters that turn Ohio-Wisconsin-Michigan-Pennsylvania.

Newt is an electoral disaster. He was one of the most unpopular figures in America when conservatives forced him out of the Speakership, and it won't take much to remind people why. He has never been elected to statewide office and has never demonstrated electoral appeal outside his district. Polling at 15% in Iowa and trailing Obama head-to-head is evidence of his potential, and not in a positive sense.

94 posted on 12/21/2011 1:44:00 PM PST by Crichton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Romney is going to win NH regardless. Gingrich is safe in SC, and looks strong in FL.

Romney is a good bet to win NH, but Gingrich was at 35% nationally a week ago and has fallen to 27% now (RCP avg) -- South Carolina is a full month away and his last 3 polls there are going the wrong way: 42 -> 38 -> 31.

A week is a lifetime in politics. Gingrich picked up a lot of Cain's support but now he's bleeding fast.

95 posted on 12/21/2011 1:52:45 PM PST by Crichton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

In other words, don’t panic.. stay cool.... Stay on course...I think it’s Newt’s to lose.


96 posted on 12/21/2011 3:14:50 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

In other words, don’t panic.. stay cool.... Stay on course...I think it’s Newt’s to lose.


97 posted on 12/21/2011 3:16:19 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: erlayman
He may not have campaigned there but to say that Gingrich is beating Romney in all other polls by double digits is simply false.

If I said that, it was a typo, but I can't find where you think I said it. Please show me the referrence.

Of course Gingrich isn't beating Romney by double digits.

98 posted on 12/21/2011 3:35:34 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Crichton
Newt is an electoral disaster. He was one of the most unpopular figures in America when conservatives forced him out of the Speakership

Which "conservatives" were those? The ones who failed to balance fourteen consecutive budgets or do anything about Social Security?

99 posted on 12/21/2011 3:41:32 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Crichton

You are not helping your case here. In the same time period, Santorum has gone from 3.5% to 3.8% nationally. And two weeks ago he was at 7.7% in Iowa. Now he’s at 7.0%. Not exactly what I would call picking up momentum.


100 posted on 12/21/2011 3:45:56 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson