Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Aide Says Ron Paul Is a 9/11 Truther & Isolationist Who Thinks U.S. Shouldn't Have Fought Hitler
The Weekly Standard ^ | December 26, 2011 | JOHN MCCORMACK

Posted on 12/26/2011 10:06:21 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

A former Ron Paul staffer named Eric Dondero, who worked closely with the Texas congressman and presidential candidate over the course of 15 years, has issued a statement in which he both defends his old boss from charges of racism and anti-Semitism and reveals damning new details about about the "sheer lunacy of [Paul's] foreign policy views".

First, Dondero claims that his old boss is such an extreme isolationist that "he strenuously does not believe the United States had any business getting involved in fighting Hitler in WWII. He expressed to me countless times, that 'saving the Jews,' was absolutely none of our business."

Second, Dondero writes that that Paul himself is a 9/11 conspiracy theorist:

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gopprimary; libertarian; ronpaul; ronpaultruthfile; truther
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: ejonesie22; All

Before I stopped talking to my dad, he told me people judge you by the company you keep..


21 posted on 12/26/2011 10:44:59 AM PST by KevinDavis (Radical Islam is a bigger threat than the LDS...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: algernonpj

Ron Paul is the sock puppet of Lew Rockwell, his former congressional aid. These are Rockwell’s views, especially re 9/11, which those of us on FR on that fateful day well remember. BTW, how’d you like Paul on Leno— “Michelle Bachmann hates Muslims” and “Santorum hates Muslim and gays?” Let him boil in his own grease; he wanted to play the media game so long as he was getting their “strange new respect.”


22 posted on 12/26/2011 10:46:07 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Any time I have been able to track down the entire newletter referenced in a Ron Paul smear, the smear has been a dissembling partial truth.

Like him or not Paul, brings to the campaign serious questions that warrant discussion, questions about big government, how US taxpayer money is spent, foreign policy, the role of the Fed...

While my research thus far leads me to believe that Ron Paul is naive regarding the most basic motivation of Jihadis, consider the following:

GW kept reminding us that 'Islam is a religion of 'peace'. Never mentioned that Islam is a total political system and peace is achieved when there is a world wide caliphate under Sharia.

Ultimately Paul's foreign policy would be better for both Israel and Christianity.

While Israel would get no foreign aid, neither would its enemies:
2011 Interview

Newsmax: What should our relationship be with Israel?
Ron Paul:
We should be their friend and their trading partner. They are a democracy and we share many values with them. But we should not be their master. We should not dictate where their borders will be nor should we have veto power over their foreign policy.
... Stop and consider America’s policy: We give $3 billion a year to Israel in loans; and we give $12 billion or more in assistance to Israel’s self-declared enemies. Some of these are countries that say they will drive Israel into the sea.
... We should share intelligence for mutually agreed-upon goals. We should honor our pledge to refuse any arms sales that would undermine Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region.

As a result of nation building, promoting 'democracy' in the middle east, and PC immigration:

Iraq's Christians Near Extinction

Per Pamela Geller "US policy regarding the refugee resettlement program would shock most Americans if they only knew. The UN picks who becomes US refugees. Christians are being refused refugee status and face persecution and many times certain death for their religious beliefs under the sharia, while whole Muslim communities are entering the US by the tens of thousands per month despite the fact that they face no religious persecution"

Paul would stop funding the UN and pull us out of all treaties that impinge upon our sovereignty. His proposed budget would shut down entire federal bureaucracies while preserving military pensions. Could shutting don the tax payer funded trough be what has the political elite so p*ssed?
23 posted on 12/26/2011 10:47:34 AM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
"Every single candidate EXCEPT ROMNEY is getting the full treatment from the media."

It's coming, if the RINOS are able to get away with cramming him down our throats as our nominee (as they did with that other LOSER McCain).

I saw Ed Gillespi (I think it was) in an interview on FNC where he said that he has seen the DNC's stack of opposition research on Romney. He raised his hand to indicate that it was higher than his head.

24 posted on 12/26/2011 10:47:52 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

It’s good to see someone I don’t like being investigated.


25 posted on 12/26/2011 10:48:00 AM PST by Politics4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

See the thing is,...

Just when it seems, all of this mud-slinging is transparent pap from the Romney people.

There you go again. Perrywinkle.


26 posted on 12/26/2011 10:49:41 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algernonpj

No, we’re not “down to taking The word of a disgruntled fired employee”. RPaul’s affiliation with with multiple individuals and websites that say the same thing is well documented.


27 posted on 12/26/2011 10:51:00 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2825188/posts?page=23#23


28 posted on 12/26/2011 10:51:17 AM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2825188/posts?page=23#23


29 posted on 12/26/2011 10:52:25 AM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Lol...

Indeed...

30 posted on 12/26/2011 10:52:59 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Back in the 1930s and early 40s, conservative stalwarts like Robert Taft were lunatic isolationists also. It took the wisdom of Franklin Roosevelt to show us the error of isolation.

Isolationism within reason should not be a dirty word to conservatives. For much of American history, isolationism was the typical conservative position.

Whether Ron Paul, with the extreme and sometimes disturbing foreign policy impressions he sometimes gives, is a proponent of "isolationism within reason" is a debatable topic. But to automatically denigrate all isolationist sentiment is to embrace the world view of FDR and reject the attitude of conservatives from George Washington to Robert Taft.

31 posted on 12/26/2011 10:53:08 AM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

After Japan sneak-attacked the U.S. and declared war, and the U.S. reciprocated by declaring war on Japan, then Nazi Germany declared war on the U.S. due to their alliance with Japan. We didn’t initiate a declaration of war on either of those countries - they did. You can’t avoid fighting a defensive war, even if only the initial sneak attack was fought on U.S. soil.


32 posted on 12/26/2011 10:54:31 AM PST by order66.exe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

>> He expressed to me countless times, that ‘saving the Jews,’ was absolutely none of our business.”

Hard to believe the ‘ex-aide’, but the remark is not inconsistent with Paul’s attitude concerning the welfare of foreigners. Whether or not this is a view maintained by Ron Paul, no doubt it’s one held by a segment of his supporters.


33 posted on 12/26/2011 10:58:04 AM PST by Gene Eric (Save a pretzel for the gas jets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algernonpj

Problem is you can’t separate the good from the bad. If you vote for Paul you are endorsing all the crackpot ideas, newsletters, etc.


34 posted on 12/26/2011 11:02:38 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Well, we would all be speaking German if Paul’s group thinkers had won.


35 posted on 12/26/2011 11:07:20 AM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: algernonpj

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1945772/posts


36 posted on 12/26/2011 11:08:01 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Did you actually bother to read:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2825188/posts?page=23#23

or for that matter any of the available newsletters?????

I think not.


37 posted on 12/26/2011 11:09:44 AM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The real question, is whether or not we should have fought in World War 1.

If the United States had not entered WW1, then it most likely would have been a stalemate and Hitler would have been working in an art studio his entire life and there would have been no such thing as WW2.


38 posted on 12/26/2011 11:12:20 AM PST by CGalen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Problem is you can’t separate the good from the bad. If you vote for Paul you are endorsing all the crackpot ideas, newsletters, etc.

When reasonable and respectable people have abandoned conservative principles, the field is left to the crackpots and extremists. Too many conservatives have embraced the foreign policy worldview of Franklin Roosevelt. I was all for fighting the Cold War, it was the necessary completion of our World War business. But the Cold War is over and Washington's advice to avoid foreign entanglements should be respected more by conservatives. We should want to conserve the ideals of the Founding Fathers over those of the New Deal.

39 posted on 12/26/2011 11:13:31 AM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

“I dont know if this stuff is true or not (he is not my choice anyway) but I don’t believe they suddenly acquired this info over the last couple of days.”

C’mon man he is now “on top”. Time for the MSM and the Pub’s to take him down.

I’m by no means a Paul fan but these attacks are the norm once anyone starts polling well.


40 posted on 12/26/2011 11:15:18 AM PST by mmanager (Reagan Revolution + Republican Revolution = Bury Obama in 2012 - Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson