Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TOP SECRET: Your Briefing on the CIA's Cold-War Spy Satellite, 'Big Bird'
The Atlantic ^ | December 29, 2011 | Alexis Madrigal

Posted on 01/01/2012 12:14:42 AM PST by neverdem

The amazing story of how our supersecret, Cold-War spy satellites took photos of the Soviet empire and dropped them to Earth, all without the help of computers, bandwidth, or digital cameras.

Here's your mission, should you choose to accept it: build a camera that can take high-resolution photographs of the Earth from orbit and return them to the Central Intelligence Agency. There's only one catch: you don't get to use a computer or a single kilobyte of network bandwidth.

That's the task that the United States government gave to a group of engineers at the optical instruments company Perkin-Elmer in Danbury, Connecticut at the height of the Cold War. It was October 1966 and the new development of the new satellite system, Hexagon, was underway. The project was a follow-on to very successful Corona satellite program and a complement to the higher-resolution Gambit satellite.

All these programs required 315,000 feet of film to be dropped in re-entry vehicles from orbit and retrieved in mid-air by U.S. forces. Gambit and Hexagon were declassified late this year, and its engineers were profiled this week by the Associated Press.

Hexagon was known as "Big Bird" and up to 1,000 Perkin-Elmer employees worked on the program during its peak in the 1970s. Almost nothing was known about the program, except for scraps of information that leaked out to reporters. For example, in 1977, the AP reported, "At present, the United States has only one Big Bird reconnaissance satellite at a time in orbit. If the Big Bird were to be destroyed by surprise attack, it might be months before the Air Force could replace it." It was also known by the likes of William Safire...

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; Russia; Technical
KEYWORDS: bigbird; cia; hexagon; kh9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Alas Babylon!
Well, by the late 70's, we had the ability to track a single bolt or nut orbiting in space, so tracking Big Bird and her "eggs" was pretty much mathematically precise:
Well, not exactly ... we had capability earlier than that.

"[The] system ... known as the Naval Space Surveillance System (NAVSPASUR), which was commissioned as an operational command in 1961."

"The system concept of NAVSPASUR is that of a continuous wave (CW) multistatic radar. A high-powered transmitter generates a large fan beam of energy, commonly called the "fence," which reflects signals from an orbiting object back to separate receiving stations. These receiving stations use large arrays of antennas as an interferometer to determine the angle and angle rates of arrival from the reflected signals. By observing the target satellite from several stations, the position can be determined; using multiple penetrations, the orbit can be inferred. This rather simple concept led to a highly reliable system that could detect virtually any satellite coming within the transmitter's illuminated field."

www.fas.org/spp/military/program/track/spasur_at.htm

21 posted on 01/01/2012 7:07:34 AM PST by _Jim (Conspiracy theories are the favored tools of the weak-minded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

What is that? A phased array radar site?


22 posted on 01/01/2012 7:10:46 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

What they don’t tell you is that the Russians were doing this long before we were.


23 posted on 01/01/2012 7:13:21 AM PST by WackySam (Obama got Osama just like Nixon landed on the moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Portcall24

Now how did the Soviets know where it was going to land?


24 posted on 01/01/2012 7:22:44 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Portcall24

So I wonder how they knew where to be..?


25 posted on 01/01/2012 7:24:49 AM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Is that the one at Eglin AFB?


26 posted on 01/01/2012 7:32:57 AM PST by saminfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
I always wondered how they could manage to time the plane flights precisely enough to catch film dropped from space.

Reentry mathematics and mechanics were pretty well-known at that point, being used also in how we were able to target our ICBMs (and particularly the later Minuteman series with MIRVs) and land the Mercury/Gemini/Apollo space capsules so close to the recovery ships. All the planes had to do was orbit within a set coordinate box, then aim for the parachutes.
27 posted on 01/01/2012 7:37:20 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WackySam

You have some non-Soviet documentation to support that?


28 posted on 01/01/2012 8:10:57 AM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt
You have some non-Soviet documentation to support that?

Not in writing. But the man who told me was a retired AF Col. with a great deal of knowledge on the subject.
29 posted on 01/01/2012 8:20:48 AM PST by WackySam (Obama got Osama just like Nixon landed on the moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Check my profile. PAVE PAWS at Cape Cod AFS, Mass.


30 posted on 01/01/2012 8:30:39 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: saminfl

No, this is the AN-FPS 115. The Eglin array is an AN-FP 85. The AN-FPS 115 was modeled from the earlier model Eglin phased array.

In fact, when we went operational in 1979 about half of the personnel came from Eglin.


31 posted on 01/01/2012 8:36:25 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: WackySam
Scuttlebutt likely not limited to enlisted folks. Not saying its false info from your friend.

I tend to be very skeptical regarding Cold War hi-tech claims relating to USSR. They were definitely masters of deception, not necessarily advanced technology. Some of the deception was fostered by our Mil to enable increasing budgets.

32 posted on 01/01/2012 8:40:55 AM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: larryjohnson
My Dad did some classified work on radar, and was SAC rated early on. We barely made it back to the US before the Vietnam War ended. Never really new what he did, except for GCA work around the world.

We made a map of countries visited before he passed away. My map (thanks to the military postings) covered about 15 countries. His map must have covered 50 countries, and he still wouldn't talk about his adventures. Secrecy was treated much differently back then.

What was the source selection team?

33 posted on 01/01/2012 9:01:58 AM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rappini
Thanks for the post very interesting I would still like to see them declassify Echelon.
Doesn't exist; find a real telco or 'switch' engineer in your church or social group and ask about their 'Echelon Trunk' back to wherever (Langley?) ... doesn't exist.

Or ask them about the 'Echelon racks' in their local telephone central office (CO) 'switching' exchanges ... they don't exist. Never did.

They didn't exist in our MTSO (mobile telephone switching office) either ... none. No trunks, no 'Ecehelon racks'.

34 posted on 01/01/2012 9:03:08 AM PST by _Jim (Conspiracy theories are the favored tools of the weak-minded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: texas booster
Secrecy was treated much differently back then.

For some it still is. An open ended non-disclosure statement.

35 posted on 01/01/2012 9:08:29 AM PST by SLB (23rd Artillery Group, Republic of South Vietnam, Aug 1970 - Aug 1971.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Ice Station Zebra

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-inOYbfFYNqs/Tq1TZrjHwnI/AAAAAAAAEgA/0_X7PIjqtkU/s640/Michel-Legrand-Ice-Station-Zebra-476897.jpg


36 posted on 01/01/2012 9:22:31 AM PST by Para-Ord.45 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

IIRC, that’s exactly how we recovered the first chimp we sent into space. (Able?)
A prop driven, Air Force plane either had a slingshot-shaped device on its nose or dragged a “U” shaped sling behind in order to snag the parachute shrouds in mid-air.


37 posted on 01/01/2012 9:42:21 AM PST by Roccus (POLITICIAN...............a four letter word spelled with ten letters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic

You may not remember but in the beginning the recordings did not self destruct, they required manual burning. I think the auto destruct came with Peter Graves. Tape recorders were rather large too. {:-)

Of course some of us remember wire recorders.


38 posted on 01/01/2012 12:27:31 PM PST by itsahoot (Throw them all out! Especially the Frugal Socialists who call themselves Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

I wonder how many of today’s engineers could accomplish the same feats with the same equipment.


39 posted on 01/01/2012 2:38:58 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather; Jack Hydrazine

I’m not sure but I would guess either John Walker or perhaps Christopher Boyce. I’m pretty certain the Soviets learned how we did it with the classified information that Christopher gave them when he was working at TRW in Dominguez Hills, CA.


40 posted on 01/01/2012 2:58:35 PM PST by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson