Posted on 01/27/2012 6:53:39 AM PST by transducer
A child born in a country to a mother who was its citizen and a sperm donor of unknown origin is a child of a citizen. Another child born in a country to a mother who was a citizen and a sperm donor of unknown origin is also a child of a citizen. One child born in a country of a parent who was its citizen plus one child born in a country of a parent who was its citizen equals "children born in a country of parents who were its citizens".
You guys do realize there is a reason that Mark Levin completely dismisses you right?
Bullcrap.
Stop spreading lies on FR, Obot troll.
He was deemed a citizen ...by virtue of the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution...
You even give it away with your own words...He was ruled a citizen...
You didn't say "He was ruled a natural born citizen..."
Until the 14th Amendment was passed you could be born in the US and not be a citizen (slaves).
So you may want to rethink your comment.
Thanks for admitting to the logical errors of conflating issues and appeal to authority.
But I will answer anyway, since I'm in such a fine mood.
Mark Levin castigates those who say Obama wasn't born here, and therefore needs to be impeached. I don't hold with that, either, since
a) Obama already holds the office, and
b) Obama isn't a natural-born citizen, which holds constitutional priority over how pretty his birth certificate is.
The 2012 election is another chance. If Obama is not an NBC, he should not be on any state ballot for President, and if elected in that state, should not be certified by the Secretary of State for that state. End of story.
This article is Afterbirther flapdoodle for sure, Mr. Retread freeper.
How long will it be before you get zotted again?
Thanks but I don’t think one needs to be on fire in order to be able to read and interpret the English with some clarity.
You seem to have that ability as well and that is a GOOD thing for our country!
You forgot “Natural Born Citizen”.
If I remember correctly, this turd was zotted for threatening to sue Jim for some alleged ‘libel’ by another freeper on a CrEvo thread.
Looks like he finally got zotted - took awhile didn’t it!
Review these 3 cases after reading the constitutions original intent by the founding fathers here:
http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_01.htm
Book 1 Chapter XIX
§ 212. Citizens and natives.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
___________________________________________________________
Then tell me birthers are wrong.
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/minorvhapp.html
MINOR v. HAPPERSETT
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
88 U.S. 162; 21 Wall. 162
OCTOBER, 1874, Term
[Unanimous decision of the Supreme Court holding that the Constitution of the United States
does not guarantee to women the right to vote in federal elections.]
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/135/case.html
BOYD V. NEBRASKA EX REL. THAYER, 143 U. S. 135 (1892)
Case Preview
Full Text of Case
U.S. Supreme Court
Boyd v. Nebraska ex Rel. Thayer, 143 U.S. 135 (1892)
Boyd v. Nebraska ex Rel. Thayer
No. 1208
Argued December 8, 1891
Decided February 1, 1892
143 U.S. 135
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
http://supreme.justia.com/us/193/621/
POPE V. WILLIAMS, 193 U. S. 621 (1904)
Case Preview
Full Text of Case
U.S. Supreme Court
Pope v. Williams, 193 U.S. 621 (1904)
Pope v. Williams
No. 603
Argued March 8-9, 1904
Decided April 4, 1904
193 U.S. 621
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Transducer has had his jolt (again, retread)
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Period!
Great post. I will have to go back and read that full paper. Which founding father was this? Hamilton?
This account has been banned or suspended.
All right, stoopid.
Let’s work this thing backward.
Let’s start with a lawful demand to appear in a legally constituted court, in the United States of America and a Georgia venue.
(Little wordy but what the hell. By now you are gone anyway)
You got that right. GA will likely end up being known as the mouse that roared. Right now there are about 4-5 other states thinking about keeping Obozo off the ballot and they are watching our case closely.
The truth of the matter is that Barack Obama never was eligible to run for President and through some unspoken agreement both parties aided and abetted by the MSM looked the other way and allowed him to get elected. Obama was never adequately vetted. He has many secrets that he has gone to extreme lengths to keep hidden for 3 years now. Finally the vetting is beginning.
Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal are also not eligible as natural born citizens and they should not be allowed to run for VP or President. They can serve their country in other ways.
My personal belief is that if GA decides to keep Barry off the ballot he will never appeal it higher than the GA state supreme court because he is afraid he will lose if he takes it to the Supremes. Besides the fact that his father was not a US citizen there must be some problem with his original birth certificate. Otherwise he could have had his attorney just show up with the original and the judge might have gone for it. He has most likely produced a forgery for the public and his lawyer is probably hesitant to carry forged docs to a judge.
You might want to invest in a dictionary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.