“Oh really! You actually know what I know about it? Could you share with us how exactly it is that you know what I know? Do you make all of your decisions on speculation and assumptions?”
You say EMP like those that say “Global Warming”. You read it on the Internet enough times to claim it must be true: Repeat a lie often and long enough and the feeble minded will believe anything said. EMP = Global Warming. Different crowd, same mentality.
How do I know what you know? Because I Know what I know professionally about EMP and I know you’re full of poop when it comes to EMP saying we’re all going to die.
Perhaps you could let us know . . . given the following scenarios . . .
I realize the following parameter is not realistic . . . perhaps . . . but let’s ASSUME that our defensive systems are either a) ordered not used, b) turned off/sabotaged, c) overmuch ineffective.
A) A major highly advanced EMP weapon is lit off at an optimum height over the central USA—say just South a bit of Kansas City.
1. What radius of damage would entail neutered:
a) modern vehicles with chips?
b) electrical grid?
c) computers & electronics in homes that were not faraday cages (seems to me single wide trailers might do better?)
d) cell phone networks and phones
e) landline phones:
. . . 1) land line phones wherein cables were mostly buried
. . . 2) land line phones wherein cables were not mostly buried.
B) EMP pulse weapons were lit off over at least 50% of the following cities
—Los Angeles
—San Francisco
—Seattle
—Chicago
—Denver
—Phoenix
—Albuquerque
—DC
—NYC
—Boston
—Atlanta
—Columbus Ohio
What would the sphere’s of damage be like then?
Have you taken any precautions at all re the EMP threat?
OK, enough of the lies. Show me where I said “we’re all going to die” or anything close to that. Show me where I said anything other than ask you a question. Either show me where I said that or admit you’re assumptions and accusations are totally out of line and apologize.