Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Via. Drudge: Fox Tests Volt, Runs Out Of Juice In Lincoln Tunnel
The Truth about Cars ^ | February 7, 2012

Posted on 02/07/2012 2:00:54 PM PST by Zakeet

GM noted that Fox has issues with the Volt. They give Eric Bolling a Chevy Volt for a week. And this is what GM receives in return. Ingrates. *



* Bet you poor dumb working stiffs can hardly wait until there are a few hundred of these overpriced golf carts on the road in New York City ... and they all run out of power ... on a cold day ... at the same time ... on narrow roads, intersections, bridges, overpasses, ramps, and tunnels ... at pretty much the same time. Then, you really will be a bunch of ingrates!

Note: There is a six minute video embedded in the original article.

(Excerpt) Read more at thetruthaboutcars.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gm; volt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: combat_boots

My granddad still has a T-shirt that says “Ask This Man To Show You His Wang” - with the Wang logo. Still funny today.


61 posted on 02/07/2012 3:25:06 PM PST by SkyDancer ("Never Have Regrets Because At The Time It Was Exactly What You Wanted")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

The problem, as EE’s have tried to explain to the “I love unicorns!” crowd for decades, is that batteries are a very inefficient energy storage device.

There is no battery technology that can compress energy into a density remotely near that of chemical fuels (eg, gasoline, much less diesel fuel). None. There’s nothing REMOTELY close to those energy densities on the horizon in battery technology.

Now, in addition to the energy density problems of batteries, there’s the additional problem that you can remove or replace energy into batteries only so fast without compromising them. If you want to see what I mean, just go get a 100 amp 12 charger (they’re used to rapidly recharge truck and tractor batteries) and put that puppy on a common car battery. You’ll find after you do this several times that the battery simply won’t hold as much power on each successive recharge. Batteries don’t like to have power rammed into them - they have definite maximum sustainable recharge rates, which when exceeded, cost you battery life.

Oh, BTW - be very careful because a car battery might explode if you try to dump 100 amps/hour into it. Want to recharge that battery safely? Recharge it overnight at 2 amps/hour - or maybe for a full day if it was really dead.

Then there’s the discharge rate issues. Batteries store energy in a chemical reaction, and as everyone knows, chemical reactions slow down in the cold. So cars like the Volt end up spending some of their energy to heat the battery in cold weather so they can get power out of it faster than natural rates would allow. Yea, that makes for really long ranges: Using battery power to heat the battery so we can discharge it faster... um, what problem were we trying to solve again?

The problems here are multiple. The electric auto advocates haven’t come close to solving even ONE of the multiple issues of: power density, discharge rates in cold weather, recharge rates, weight, etc. They’re still peddling the same ideas from 100 years ago (literally, no exaggeration) and they’ve made very scant progress in the meantime.

Now, compare that to the progress made in diesel autos, and the electric car advocates look like they’re backing the sloths in a three way race of progress between rabbits (diesels), turtles (gasoline engines) and sloths (electric vehicles).

You’re right that technology gets better over time, but the truth is that electric auto technology isn’t really getting all that much better. Sure, they’re more comfy, more stylin’, with sexier dashboards, etc. That’s true for all cars. The ONE thing that has to get better for the electric car to become viable is the battery technology, and it can’t get just a little bit better around the edges. It has to become “order-of-magnitude” better.

That simply hasn’t happened in the last 100 years. And from what I know as a EE, it ain’t on the horizon, either. If we had even one-tenth the rate of progress in battery technology we’ve had in sold state electronics (transistors and chips) in the last 50 years, you’d be able to power your car for 50 miles with a battery that is about the size of a wristwatch.

Look at it another way: Consider how much music you can now store on an iPad Nano. A huge leap forward in personal entertainment since the first portable transistor radios, right?

Batteries, relatively speaking, have progressed from a 12” LP vinyl record to the 45RPM single in the last 100 years.


62 posted on 02/07/2012 3:25:26 PM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ILS21R

Did you call?


63 posted on 02/07/2012 3:30:25 PM PST by nevergiveup (When in Rome, speak Roman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

And a new battery set does not cost your first newborn!


64 posted on 02/07/2012 3:30:25 PM PST by SgtHooper (The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

You can bet that for any problem with your battery set, they will write the warranty such that the customer pays 90% of the time. Just like tire problems.


65 posted on 02/07/2012 3:33:01 PM PST by SgtHooper (The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

Something like 3-4 thousand dollars to replace not counting labor. (no pun intended LOL)


66 posted on 02/07/2012 3:33:50 PM PST by SkyDancer ("Never Have Regrets Because At The Time It Was Exactly What You Wanted")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

I went to computer tech school at Control Data in the mid 80’s.. Was going to be hired by NASA at the Glenn Center, but they had to hire a minority woman. Went to work night shift in a sheet metal shop to pay my bills. Pretty bitter about that. The Control Data school was a complete gov’ment scam.


67 posted on 02/07/2012 3:34:07 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
The Wright Brothers did have a contract from the Army, beginning in 1908.

To develop man made flight or to buy a new technology that could be purposed for warfare? The comparison is not even in the same ballpark.

68 posted on 02/07/2012 3:34:20 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: nevergiveup

9/26/1998...that would have been a tough one to beat...lol


70 posted on 02/07/2012 3:39:21 PM PST by ILS21R (Never give up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
The first car you had to use a hand crank and probably had to stop every 100 feet.

You never cease to amaze........

71 posted on 02/07/2012 3:40:03 PM PST by Osage Orange (A clear conscience is the sign of a fuzzy memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

That goes without saying, of course.

I keep harping on this, and I’m sure I’m a bore on the topic, but it really is the brutal truth. Batteries are the crux of the matter.

Look at the people who want to use solar or wind power to light up their homes as another example. I used to help several families in central NV, where I was known as the only EE within 80 to 100 miles radius that could help straighten out their solar power systems.

These poor people would be sold a solar or wind power system from some bunch of Unicorn-fart sniffers in California, Reno or Arizona, they’d install it, get it up and going and the dealer would imply that they were all set.

Nooooo.... the batteries need minding. And then I’d have to come out to their remote ranch and start telling them how to equalize their lead-acid batteries, how to do tend to them, how they’d degrade if charged too fast, discharged too fast, etc.

And in every case, the people to whom I’d teach all this stuff would ask “Well, this is all news to me! No one ever told me about this!” or “They told me that that was all in the past!”

Then I’d have to tell them that the BEST person they could get to explain all this stuff to them would be a WWII submariner, because diesel-electric boats lived and died on these issues. I’d then add “I would have suggested a WWI submariner, but as far as I know, they’re all dead...”

And you’d see these people get ROYALLY pissed off... because they’d then realize that there wasn’t some “huge leap forward” in recent solar and wind power stuff... it was the same stuff from the 1970’s, and the little integrated inverter/control panel was really the only new thing on the scene. Most of these ranches, you see, had flirted with solar power during the initial wave of enthusiasm in the 70’s... and during the 80’s to 90’s, as diesel costs came down, they just went to gensets puttering along on the ranch during their waking hours. When diesel went up, they checked into solar power (again) and were sold the same stuff (basically) as they were in the 70’s.


72 posted on 02/07/2012 3:43:16 PM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ILS21R

Bwaaaahaaaaaaaaaa ...one of the few commercials I’ll watch.


73 posted on 02/07/2012 3:45:26 PM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

They were making electric cars 100 years ago. The reason they stopped was the same reason they are a sh#tty idea now. Batteries are inferior to internal combustion engines.


74 posted on 02/07/2012 3:46:56 PM PST by Kozak ("It's not an Election it's a Restraining Order" .....PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kidd
The first commercial "radarange" came out in 1954 and sold for $2000.
75 posted on 02/07/2012 3:47:45 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

Good post!


76 posted on 02/07/2012 3:51:07 PM PST by Osage Orange (A clear conscience is the sign of a fuzzy memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

I have to disagree! The Volt was originally pushed as getting up to 60 miles on a single charge. When it debuted it was dropped to 40 miles. GM now says 35. I guess that’s in a controlled test without heater, A/C, lights or defroster. And probably going downhill. Bolling was actually being generous by saying it went 25 miles when he had to go 18 miles to his office according to his GPS. Since the car switched to gas before that despite a full charge I would have to say it does have a problem with range. Especially in light of the fact that an 1896 Robert Electric got 40 miles on a charge. Not much progress in 116 years!


77 posted on 02/07/2012 3:51:12 PM PST by rex regnum insanit (falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Step away from the Kool Aid, lest ye be zotted.


78 posted on 02/07/2012 3:51:12 PM PST by Fred Hayek (FUBO, the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Just what is the problem with a 19th technology that must be subsidized to the tune of $250,000 for Dolt by the taxpayer and then it’s still a piece of crap? No...no problem there. Why don’t you take a train...another inefficient subsidized crummy technology.


79 posted on 02/07/2012 3:53:16 PM PST by hal ogen (1st Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

Wow. Asking a question is kool aid? You are a communist. You need to be zotted NOW.


80 posted on 02/07/2012 3:55:31 PM PST by napscoordinator (Go Santorum! Go Patriots! America's poses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson