Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh Show,M-F,12PM-3PM,EST,WABC AM, February 23, 2012
The EIB Network ^ | February 23,2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 02/23/2012 8:43:56 AM PST by Biggirl

Call The Rush Limbaugh Show program line between 12 Noon and 3PM Eastern Time at: 1-800-282-2882

E-mail Rush: ElRushbo@eibnet.com

Fax Rush at: 212-445-3963

Write a letter to Rush and mail it to:

The Rush Limbaugh Show

1270 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10020

Join This Ping List Now! Click Here To Join this Ping List!

AND NOW . . . amidst billowing clouds of fragrant, aromatic first- and second-hand premium cigar smoke. . . it is time for . . . that harmless, lovable little fuzz ball, the highly-trained broadcast specialist, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, from behind the golden EIB microphone, firmly ensconced in the prestigious Attila-the-Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute of Advanced Conservative Studies, serving humanity simply by showing up, and he’s not retiring until every American agrees with him, do NOT doubt him, with shrieks of joy at the mere mention of his name...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fl; limbaugh; rush; rushlimbaugh; rushlive; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-311 next last
To: Eva
Santorum is not the one who is intent on making the election about sex.

Regardless of his intentions, Santorum's statements about Satan, sensuality, and a state's "right" to ban birth control have and will continue to provide the Democrats and their media friends with an easy target to hit.

281 posted on 02/23/2012 2:53:04 PM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: trisham

So which self-destructive, unambitious youngster are you supporting?


282 posted on 02/23/2012 2:56:53 PM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: ravinson

Feel free to rephrase that comment.


283 posted on 02/23/2012 2:59:54 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: ravinson

Satan is present in our society. What part of that don’t you understand?

States rights, dummy.

um, does your elevator go all the way to the top? now he wants congress to declare a war on sensualism?

As a Catholic, I do declare war on Satan, you are welcome.

are trying to tell me Catholics aren’t sensual?

Interesting that your Republican roots go back to 1840, when the Republican party was forming and people who are free love and anti-war needed a home.

now you have one in Ron Paul, but he still isn’t a Republican.


284 posted on 02/23/2012 3:00:06 PM PST by jenk (The country needs Sarah Palin and the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Well, this certainly is a campaign all about ideas for you, huh? I find it hard to believe that such a kind, amiable, high-minded, idealistic Santorum supporter can still be a miss.


285 posted on 02/23/2012 3:03:46 PM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: ravinson
Well, this certainly is a campaign all about ideas for you, huh? I find it hard to believe that such a kind, amiable, high-minded, idealistic Santorum supporter can still be a miss.

you have already demonstrated that fact can't enter your head - nothing new here

286 posted on 02/23/2012 3:06:26 PM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Eva, I don’t support Romney and I agree that many Americans (but not I) are anti-Mormon, but at least Romney does a better job than Santorum from keeping his unpopular religious beliefs in the deep background.


287 posted on 02/23/2012 3:08:19 PM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: ravinson
atheists are a very small segment of our God-fearing society. 78% are Christian. check it out go to h e double toothpicks
288 posted on 02/23/2012 3:22:37 PM PST by jenk (The country needs Sarah Palin and the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom

I don’t know. I don’t believe it was Andrea Tarantula’s mom. Rush cut away quickly but didn’t mention it again. If it was she was a Mommy Dearest with daughter issues.


289 posted on 02/23/2012 3:45:39 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ravinson

Rush loves well spoken callers. He just hates idiots. And rude idiots are the worst. She wouldn’t stop talking and he couldn’t have a dialogue with her because she wouldn’t shut up.

Most people on this thread wanted to throttle her.

Maybe it was you???


290 posted on 02/23/2012 3:56:38 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. P
" ‘Zactly. I had a discussion recently with one of these people, they are so smarmy and assured of their intelligence. "

Can we say ? Sanctimonious " ?

Sounds like a Newt supporter.
291 posted on 02/23/2012 4:11:07 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: sloop
I take it you have no legal background.

The Tenth Amendment only grants States or the people unspecified powers (not rights), and States are only granted powers not "prohibited by [the US Constitution] to the States." Several other amendments provide strong arguments against State prohibition of birth control.

The Ninth Amendment makes it clear that the people are presumed by the framers as having protected rights not specified in the Constitution. Arguably, reproductive freedom is one of those presumed rights since there were no State restrictions in place to my knowledge when the Bill of Rights was passed. Other amendments which suuport an argument against a state power to ban birth control are the First Amendment's free exercise of religion clause, the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures, and the Fifth Amendment's due process provisions, all of which are applicable to the States under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Santorum has argued that states have a "right" to ban contraceptives, so your 10th amendment "powers" argument does not support Santorum's States' rights argument. Apparently Santorum never learned the difference between rights and powers in law school, which is troubling in itself.

I would expect a politician like Santorum with a law degree to have a better working knowledge of the Constitution by now. Keep in mind that anyone who recognizes a State's right to ban contraception is also suggesting that States have a right to require contraception. Suppose a State passes a law requiring all married females under 25 to use contraception based on their findings that younger women are not sufficiently prepared for the demands of motherhood. Santorum's interpretation of the Constitition would support such forced contraception.

292 posted on 02/23/2012 4:29:48 PM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: jenk
Satan is present in our society

Show me the evidence of that and explain how you're going to fight the Spiritual War against sensuality with Santorum. Who are you going to attack next? More clinics?

293 posted on 02/23/2012 4:38:51 PM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: ravinson
the states DO have the power

and you have said nothing to prove otherwise - just guessed and presumed and twisted

my background has nothing to do with the facts - since you seem to think only a lawyer can have an opinion on this, facts espoused by mark levin

your pathetic attempts to equate unrelated things does nothing to prove your point - states can ban drugs - but have zero power to force drugs on people

you really, really need to take my recommendation and get some education - stuff that makes sense in your pointy head have nothing to do with reality

maybe you should try the commerce clause next

294 posted on 02/23/2012 4:55:47 PM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: ravinson

I’m not a Santorum supporter, I’m a Gingrich supporter. You are a supporter of an absolute nutcase - a bigot, a writer of racist newsletters and a complete weirdo who should be put out to pasture. Which will be happening soon enough.


295 posted on 02/23/2012 5:08:55 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Oh do you now? Did God ask your opinion on who should be the first person to see the Risen Christ? (Hint, a prostitute?). How about who should not only be the most famous King in Israel’s history, but the King singled out for lineage to Jesus? (Hint, an adulterer who used murder to aid his adulterous act).

So, who angered Jesus more than anyone? (HINT: Pharisees, not sure whether they wore sweater vests or not...).

Just sayin.....I’m not so sure you know.


296 posted on 02/23/2012 5:28:46 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ravinson

Utter rubbish- This was not the intent of Santorum


297 posted on 02/23/2012 5:39:59 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: ravinson

Utter rubbish- This was not the intent of Santorum


298 posted on 02/23/2012 5:40:02 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Thank you very much and my apologies to everyone. Had a problem with the computer I use for FR. I can’t use a work computer and bring my laptop from home.

I’m sorry and will post the thread tomorrow.


299 posted on 02/23/2012 5:42:14 PM PST by IMissPresidentReagan ("I want to totally disassociate myself from the Reagan Administration." - Ron Paul, 1988)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan

don’t let it happen again

*ducks*


300 posted on 02/23/2012 5:44:08 PM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson