Posted on 03/02/2012 7:29:35 PM PST by jdoug666
Just when Obama was starting to run out of things to say about Republicans, Sheriff Joe Arpaio decides to come out and launch a big investigation into Barack Obamas birth certificate
(Excerpt) Read more at glennbeck.com ...
So why won’t he? Why isn’t he treating this seriously?
Yet I don’t hate you. You are just an internet nobody - like me. You have not given me reason to hate you.
Yet I don’t hate you. You are just an internet nobody - like me. You have not given me reason to hate you.
Why isnt he treating this seriously?
It seems to me that he treated it seriously enough to initiate an initial investigation.
But to get a real answer, again...call and ask him if you want to know so bad. I'm not him and I don't speak for him, rock head.
Yet I dont hate you.
Your antagonism speaks loudly through your subtle, velvet lies.
You are just an internet nobody - like me.
Well, not quite. People know who I am in real life. I actually interact with people.
But you're right in another aspect, I am a nobody and I like it that way.
That makes you the enemy of the American people.
not because I support him (I despise him)
That makes you a sick twisted freak.
It is truly sad that Ron Paul has refused to take up this cause...
Ron Paul is also an enemy of the American people, who wants Achmedidjerdog to nuke American cities.
He could try to sell a coffee mug instead.
“subtle, velvet lies” = questions you can’t answer.
Lets remember which of us always resorts to rudeness and petty insults.
We have always understood Obama’s morals. One would hope that those investigating him are held to a higher standard.
What does publishing a book about an investigation have to do with morals?? Nonfiction books are the result of research and investigation. Is that somehow immoral??
Beck gets worse day by day.
>> “. Its uncomfortable and the masses will shoo it away.” <<
.
I meet lots of people, and I’ve yet to meet one that doesn’t know that he is not constitutionally ellegible to hold office. Some of them voted for him.
Axelrod, Your head is full of dog excrement.
You noobs are so politically astute!
When do you graduate from 8th grade?
>> “The people who say we should ignore this issue even if its true are whats wrong with this country.” <<
Without a doubt.
The jerks that do it here are paid shills.
.
RIghtwardHo is a paid Obama shill.
Note the use of the “Extremist” tag, which is only used by the far left. No normal person would use that word.
Wow!
Amazing that another paid shill should pop in on this thread too.
You creeps are so easy to draw out.
Look at Harlan1196’s posting history.
He is a paid interloper here.
Yes, hir did!
Arguing with a paid shill.
Waste of time.
Arguing with a paid shill
Waste of time.
Well, if communism is as you say decent, then why not descent into it, huh?
Lets remember which of us always resorts to rudeness and petty insults.
Lets remember why I'm rude to you and deliver such well deserved petty insults...
@Liar! Character assassin!
@There is no such thing as Positive law. It is a meaningless legal term.
You stepped off in it first, buddy, you better learn to deal with it.
Who’s Obama?
You are just an internet nobody - like me.
But you're right in another aspect, I am a nobody and I like it that way.
Silly me!
You thought I was a vain person and you expected me to take umbrage at being called a nobody. And since I'm not vain and I didn't respond in the manner you anticipated you had little choice but to grasp at straws.
subtle, velvet lies = questions you cant answer.
Sorry about that. If I had realized your game earlier I would have played along. Alas, it's too late for that.
sorry my fingers type but are not good spellers...should have been descent...as in going down into and no I am no Axelbot but thank you for the shaw awake
and to you my apologies....should have been descent....appreciate the gentle nudge
You really put a lot of effort into making yourself angry, don’t you?
My only point is there is no one on the internet that can effect my live - that no squabble on a discussion is worth hating over. You obviously think differently.
So is the investigation over? All legal matters settled and justice served?
Or do we have an “investigator” profiting from an ongoing investigation? Someone with a financial incentive to needless prolong the investigation? Someone with a financial incentive to come to a conclusion that sells birther books?
Do you think a real LEO would legally be allowed to do this?
My only point is...
You made no point and by both your words and deeds you belie your current claim.
It doesn't matter. A lot of things are written about before they are "settled."
Or do we have an investigator profiting from an ongoing investigation?
He doesn't deserve any compensation for his work?? Would you rather he was receiving tax dollars?
Someone with a financial incentive to needless prolong the investigation?
This could be just as true if he was on the county payroll or if he was reporter for a newspaper or TV news channel, etc.
Someone with a financial incentive to come to a conclusion that sells birther books?
There's no financial incentive if his work is faulty.
Do you think a real LEO would legally be allowed to do this?
Show the law that prevents it.
Does anyone know how much Sherrif Joe & Co have taken in via their 501c3?
Arizona code > Title 38 - Public Officers and Employees > Chapter 3 CONDUCT OF OFFICE > Article 8 Conflict of Interest of Officers and Employees > 38-504. Prohibited acts:
“B. During the period of a public officer’s or employee’s employment or service and for two years thereafter, a public officer or employee shall not disclose or use for the officer’s or employee’s personal profit, without appropriate authorization, any information acquired by the officer or employee in the course of the officer’s or employee’s official duties which has been clearly designated to the officer or employee as confidential when such confidential designation is warranted because of the status of the proceedings or the circumstances under which the information was received and preserving its confidentiality is necessary for the proper conduct of government business. A public officer or employee shall not disclose or use, without appropriate authorization, any information that is acquired by the officer or employee in the course of the officer’s or employee’s official duties and that is declared confidential by law.”
http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/38/00504.htm&Title=38&DocType=ARS
An official ONGOING police investigation is the very definition of a confidential process.
If Zullo was a real Arizona LEO he broke the law.
This is proof that Sheriff Joe’s posse are not considered public officer’s in the eyes of the law.
How do you know it is not one of my subtle, velvet lies brilliantly designed to take advantage of simple old you?
Ok - so you are rude, insulting and petty even when you are happy. Got it.
Beck’s title is wrong. Arpaio is not going after the birth certificate. He is going after the computer-generated forgery that obama released and called a birth certificate.
Ummm, they held a PRESS CONFERENCE to release the findings. It’s not a confidential matter. Way to disprove your own point.
Didn’t they just say that the investigation was ongoing? That this was a preliminary report? Aren’t ongoing investigations confidential?
Police routinely give press conferences to update the public on ONGOING investigations. They don’t let investigators sell books about the results of ongoing investigations.
Secondly, show me where Sheriff Joe gave his official permission to use the information for a book. After all, supposedly he provided the resources for the investigation - the results belong to him.
Hard to be angry when you provide such amusement.
You keep backing the arguments that lose over and over again.
That’s willful ignorance.
You keep backing the arguments that lose over and over again.
You're afraid of what the end verdict will be so you keep trying to reinforce your own position to cast doubts.
You keep drawing from a dry well while you're dying of thirst.
Thats willful ignorance.
Oh, now that's funny!
No. So your response to my supposedly besmirching your character is to be rude, petty and insulting? What sort of character does such behavior reveal? Looks like all you did is get down in the mud with me. And you look very comfortable doing it.
You keep undermining your own argument. Either you think it was confidential or not. If it's not confidential, then there's no problem here.
Secondly, show me where Sheriff Joe gave his official permission to use the information for a book.
It's my understanding that Sheriff Arpaio wrote the foreword for the book.
When police update ongoing investigation do the public they do not give out details and findings. Lawyers spend a lot of time making vetting what gets released so that the final investigation is not compromised.
But why are we arguing - it was not a real investigation. The fact that Sheriff Joe wrote the forward to the book proves that - interesting to know what his under the table cut is.
What sort of character does such behavior reveal?
Now, I know you'll vehemently disagree, but I'll tell you anyway...
I don't simply roll over to 'be nice' and I won't die on my knees.
Can you "grok" that or do you need clarification?
Yes, and that's pointless unless it can lead to a comparison with the paper document in Hawaii's possession.
Can’t you at least fight back like a man instead of a whiny three year old?
Democrats pooh-pooh the contention and ridicule it. Just like many of the made up crises that Rebublicans so seriously consider when the Democrat morass blathers on and on about it (most recently, contraception, etc.).
Lastly, as we've heard so so many times before from the Democrat machine "the seriousness of the charge deserves full investigation." When you meet your maker, do you really want to explain that you didn't confront wrong because it was uncomfortable?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.