Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huh? Sheriff Joe Arpaio gives Obama 2012 a gift, goes after birth certificate
GlennBeck.com ^ | 3/2/2012 | Glenn Beck

Posted on 03/02/2012 7:29:35 PM PST by jdoug666

Just when Obama was starting to run out of things to say about Republicans, Sheriff Joe Arpaio decides to come out and launch a big investigation into Barack Obama’s birth certificate

(Excerpt) Read more at glennbeck.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beck; birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; duplicate; glennbeck; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-164 next last
To: philman_36

So why won’t he? Why isn’t he treating this seriously?


101 posted on 03/04/2012 3:02:19 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Yet I don’t hate you. You are just an internet nobody - like me. You have not given me reason to hate you.


102 posted on 03/04/2012 3:07:05 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Yet I don’t hate you. You are just an internet nobody - like me. You have not given me reason to hate you.


103 posted on 03/04/2012 3:07:57 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
So why won’t he?
You are as dense as a rock! I've already told you I'm not him and I'm not going to speak for him. You've got his number...give him a call!

Why isn’t he treating this seriously?
It seems to me that he treated it seriously enough to initiate an initial investigation.
But to get a real answer, again...call and ask him if you want to know so bad. I'm not him and I don't speak for him, rock head.

Yet I don’t hate you.
Your antagonism speaks loudly through your subtle, velvet lies.

You are just an internet nobody - like me.
Well, not quite. People know who I am in real life. I actually interact with people.
But you're right in another aspect, I am a nobody and I like it that way.

104 posted on 03/04/2012 5:30:20 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: jdoug666
I, for one, will celebrate Obama's re-election

That makes you the enemy of the American people.

not because I support him (I despise him)

That makes you a sick twisted freak.

It is truly sad that Ron Paul has refused to take up this cause...

Ron Paul is also an enemy of the American people, who wants Achmedidjerdog to nuke American cities.

105 posted on 03/04/2012 5:49:50 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

He could try to sell a coffee mug instead.


106 posted on 03/04/2012 7:24:43 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

“subtle, velvet lies” = questions you can’t answer.

Lets remember which of us always resorts to rudeness and petty insults.


107 posted on 03/04/2012 7:41:00 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: edge919

We have always understood Obama’s morals. One would hope that those investigating him are held to a higher standard.


108 posted on 03/04/2012 7:42:58 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

What does publishing a book about an investigation have to do with morals?? Nonfiction books are the result of research and investigation. Is that somehow immoral??


109 posted on 03/04/2012 7:53:31 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: jdoug666

Beck gets worse day by day.


110 posted on 03/04/2012 8:02:17 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoCards

>> “. Its uncomfortable and the masses will shoo it away.” <<

.
I meet lots of people, and I’ve yet to meet one that doesn’t know that he is not constitutionally ellegible to hold office. Some of them voted for him.


111 posted on 03/04/2012 8:04:55 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Axelrod, Your head is full of dog excrement.


112 posted on 03/04/2012 8:08:46 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

You noobs are so politically astute!

When do you graduate from 8th grade?


113 posted on 03/04/2012 8:16:23 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior

>> “The people who say we should ignore this issue even if it’s true are what’s wrong with this country.” <<

Without a doubt.

The jerks that do it here are paid shills.
.


114 posted on 03/04/2012 8:21:57 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Former War Criminal; RIghtwardHo

RIghtwardHo is a paid Obama shill.

Note the use of the “Extremist” tag, which is only used by the far left. No normal person would use that word.


115 posted on 03/04/2012 8:28:53 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

Wow!

Amazing that another paid shill should pop in on this thread too.

You creeps are so easy to draw out.


116 posted on 03/04/2012 8:30:56 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: visually_augmented; Harlan1196

Look at Harlan1196’s posting history.

He is a paid interloper here.


117 posted on 03/04/2012 8:32:57 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Has everyone lost hir mind?

Yes, hir did!

118 posted on 03/04/2012 8:34:49 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Arguing with a paid shill.

Waste of time.


119 posted on 03/04/2012 8:35:21 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Arguing with a paid shill

Waste of time.


120 posted on 03/04/2012 8:37:04 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
Obama’s reelection guarantees a decent into communism.

Well, if communism is as you say decent, then why not descent into it, huh?

121 posted on 03/04/2012 8:37:23 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
“subtle, velvet lies” = questions you can’t answer.
I answer your questions when you give me the necessary information to allow me to answer them.
Perhaps you should stop asking misleading and indirect questions in some feeble attempt to trap me in my own words.

Lets remember which of us always resorts to rudeness and petty insults.
Lets remember why I'm rude to you and deliver such well deserved petty insults...
@Liar! Character assassin!

@There is no such thing as Positive law. It is a meaningless legal term.

You stepped off in it first, buddy, you better learn to deal with it.


Come back any time you want another.

122 posted on 03/04/2012 8:40:07 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: jdoug666

Who’s Obama?


123 posted on 03/04/2012 8:51:11 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
Ohhhhh...I get it now. My bad.

You are just an internet nobody - like me.
But you're right in another aspect, I am a nobody and I like it that way.

Silly me!
You thought I was a vain person and you expected me to take umbrage at being called a nobody. And since I'm not vain and I didn't respond in the manner you anticipated you had little choice but to grasp at straws.
“subtle, velvet lies” = questions you can’t answer.

Sorry about that. If I had realized your game earlier I would have played along. Alas, it's too late for that.

124 posted on 03/04/2012 8:52:58 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

sorry my fingers type but are not good spellers...should have been descent...as in going down into and no I am no Axelbot but thank you for the shaw awake


125 posted on 03/04/2012 11:31:56 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

and to you my apologies....should have been descent....appreciate the gentle nudge


126 posted on 03/04/2012 11:32:59 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

You really put a lot of effort into making yourself angry, don’t you?

My only point is there is no one on the internet that can effect my live - that no squabble on a discussion is worth hating over. You obviously think differently.


127 posted on 03/05/2012 4:00:46 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: edge919

So is the investigation over? All legal matters settled and justice served?

Or do we have an “investigator” profiting from an ongoing investigation? Someone with a financial incentive to needless prolong the investigation? Someone with a financial incentive to come to a conclusion that sells birther books?

Do you think a real LEO would legally be allowed to do this?


128 posted on 03/05/2012 4:06:09 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
You really put a lot of effort into making yourself angry, don’t you?
How exactly have you been able to ascertain that I'm angry? (see, you're doing it again with the BS questions)

My only point is...
You made no point and by both your words and deeds you belie your current claim.

129 posted on 03/05/2012 8:22:43 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
Someone with a financial incentive to needless prolong the investigation?
Your translator slipped again. It's needlessly. (adjectives and nouns...squawk)
It'll be kind of hard to blow that off as a mere typo and yet I I get the feeling you'll try to do that anyway.
You've got a r-e-a-d-y excuse for everything.
130 posted on 03/05/2012 8:35:56 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
So is the investigation over? All legal matters settled and justice served?

It doesn't matter. A lot of things are written about before they are "settled."

Or do we have an “investigator” profiting from an ongoing investigation?

He doesn't deserve any compensation for his work?? Would you rather he was receiving tax dollars?

Someone with a financial incentive to needless prolong the investigation?

This could be just as true if he was on the county payroll or if he was reporter for a newspaper or TV news channel, etc.

Someone with a financial incentive to come to a conclusion that sells birther books?

There's no financial incentive if his work is faulty.

Do you think a real LEO would legally be allowed to do this?

Show the law that prevents it.

131 posted on 03/05/2012 8:45:20 AM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: jdoug666

Does anyone know how much Sherrif Joe & Co have taken in via their 501c3?


132 posted on 03/05/2012 8:47:57 AM PST by 2ndamendmentpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edge919

Arizona code > Title 38 - Public Officers and Employees > Chapter 3 CONDUCT OF OFFICE > Article 8 Conflict of Interest of Officers and Employees > 38-504. Prohibited acts:

“B. During the period of a public officer’s or employee’s employment or service and for two years thereafter, a public officer or employee shall not disclose or use for the officer’s or employee’s personal profit, without appropriate authorization, any information acquired by the officer or employee in the course of the officer’s or employee’s official duties which has been clearly designated to the officer or employee as confidential when such confidential designation is warranted because of the status of the proceedings or the circumstances under which the information was received and preserving its confidentiality is necessary for the proper conduct of government business. A public officer or employee shall not disclose or use, without appropriate authorization, any information that is acquired by the officer or employee in the course of the officer’s or employee’s official duties and that is declared confidential by law.”

http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/38/00504.htm&Title=38&DocType=ARS

An official ONGOING police investigation is the very definition of a confidential process.

If Zullo was a real Arizona LEO he broke the law.

This is proof that Sheriff Joe’s posse are not considered public officer’s in the eyes of the law.


133 posted on 03/05/2012 9:11:55 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

How do you know it is not one of my “subtle, velvet lies” brilliantly designed to take advantage of simple old you?


134 posted on 03/05/2012 9:13:49 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Ok - so you are rude, insulting and petty even when you are happy. Got it.


135 posted on 03/05/2012 9:16:01 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: jdoug666

Beck’s title is wrong. Arpaio is not going after the birth certificate. He is going after the computer-generated forgery that obama released and called a birth certificate.


136 posted on 03/05/2012 9:18:41 AM PST by jersey117 (The Stepford Media should be sued for malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
How do you know it is not one of my “subtle, velvet lies” brilliantly designed to take advantage of simple old you?
Competence vs incompetence.
You keep making the same mistakes over and over again.
That's incompetence.
137 posted on 03/05/2012 9:20:39 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
Ok - so you are rude, insulting and petty even when you are happy. Got it.
Ok - so you are a liar, conniving and incompetent even as you are angry. A given.
138 posted on 03/05/2012 9:23:05 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

Ummm, they held a PRESS CONFERENCE to release the findings. It’s not a confidential matter. Way to disprove your own point.


139 posted on 03/05/2012 9:34:33 AM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: edge919

Didn’t they just say that the investigation was ongoing? That this was a preliminary report? Aren’t ongoing investigations confidential?

Police routinely give press conferences to update the public on ONGOING investigations. They don’t let investigators sell books about the results of ongoing investigations.

Secondly, show me where Sheriff Joe gave his official permission to use the information for a book. After all, supposedly he provided the resources for the investigation - the results belong to him.


140 posted on 03/05/2012 9:55:58 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Hard to be angry when you provide such amusement.


141 posted on 03/05/2012 9:57:29 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

You keep backing the arguments that lose over and over again.

That’s willful ignorance.


142 posted on 03/05/2012 10:00:30 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
Hard to be angry when you provide such amusement.
You're angry. You've told lies and have tried to besmirch my character.
Only an angry person does that. It may be indirect anger, but it's anger nonetheless.
As I said, you keep making the same mistakes.

You keep backing the arguments that lose over and over again.
You're afraid of what the end verdict will be so you keep trying to reinforce your own position to cast doubts.
You keep drawing from a dry well while you're dying of thirst.

That’s willful ignorance.
Oh, now that's funny!

Willful ignorance is the state and practice of ignoring any sensory input that appears to contradict one's inner model of reality. Your "inner model of reality" is definitely being contradicted and you ignore anything that is contrary to it.
143 posted on 03/05/2012 10:27:04 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

No. So your response to my supposedly besmirching your character is to be rude, petty and insulting? What sort of character does such behavior reveal? Looks like all you did is get down in the mud with me. And you look very comfortable doing it.


144 posted on 03/05/2012 10:37:15 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
Police routinely give press conferences to update the public on ONGOING investigations.

You keep undermining your own argument. Either you think it was confidential or not. If it's not confidential, then there's no problem here.

Secondly, show me where Sheriff Joe gave his official permission to use the information for a book.

It's my understanding that Sheriff Arpaio wrote the foreword for the book.

145 posted on 03/05/2012 10:40:00 AM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: edge919

When police update ongoing investigation do the public they do not give out details and findings. Lawyers spend a lot of time making vetting what gets released so that the final investigation is not compromised.

But why are we arguing - it was not a real investigation. The fact that Sheriff Joe wrote the forward to the book proves that - interesting to know what his under the table cut is.


146 posted on 03/05/2012 10:52:56 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
So your response to my supposedly besmirching your character is to be rude, petty and insulting?
Supposedly?!! There is no "supposedly". Your actions and words are documented and you'll never escape them no matter how hard you try.
So, yeah, to you I am that way. I give back what I get first. You started this, not me.

What sort of character does such behavior reveal?
Now, I know you'll vehemently disagree, but I'll tell you anyway...
I don't simply roll over to 'be nice' and I won't die on my knees.

Can you "grok" that or do you need clarification?

147 posted on 03/05/2012 11:03:10 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
Arpaio is not going after the birth certificate. He is going after the computer-generated forgery that obama released and called a birth certificate.

Yes, and that's pointless unless it can lead to a comparison with the paper document in Hawaii's possession.

148 posted on 03/05/2012 11:11:41 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Can’t you at least fight back like a man instead of a whiny three year old?


149 posted on 03/05/2012 11:24:17 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: GoCards
With all due respect, just because 'masses' don't consider something that could very possibly be the truth doesn't mean that the possible truth of the issue is false and to be ridiculed. Far from it. It is substance particularly if it is true.

Democrats pooh-pooh the contention and ridicule it. Just like many of the made up crises that Rebublicans so seriously consider when the Democrat morass blathers on and on about it (most recently, contraception, etc.).

Lastly, as we've heard so so many times before from the Democrat machine "the seriousness of the charge deserves full investigation." When you meet your maker, do you really want to explain that you didn't confront wrong because it was uncomfortable?

150 posted on 03/05/2012 11:32:17 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson