Posted on 03/15/2012 2:34:19 PM PDT by SMGFan
“While the damage is negligible” should have been “While the damage MIGHT BE negligible”. That’s the problem with the internet, and google searches, reputations, real reputations can be damages and you will never even know it. Sorry for the typo.
Sheriff Joe is a target of the Drug Cartels in Mexico as well. They have unlimited funds, and fast n furious guns.
Talk about SICK... yea insert picture of the DoJ head, Eric Holder.
Read my profile.
I get it.
On the run so this is quick. For that and other reasons I don’t believe it was just a threat about FCC annihilation. I think there is something else that was threatened by Soros - something that ensured Obama getting into power even if anybody reported on his eligibility.
But the threat was made to the media companies, so whatever they were threatened with stayed with them.
They, however, threatened their people with job loss and/or death if they reported on this. So the media companies themselves are what threatened the on-air personalities. Basically Fox telling Beck, Hannity, O’Reilly, etc that if they made a peep about this subject they’d lose their job and/or a hit-man would visit them and their families. So what the on-air people fear is what happened to Breitbart. The supposed reason the MEDIA COMPANIES threatened the personalities was because of threats of FCC and FTC annihilation.
Even if the people made an outcry what difference would it make, given the lawlessness of the Obama Reich? We’ve had an outcry about lots of things and it never translates into anything real. We even had a landslide election and it didn’t translate into anything real in terms of stopping Obama’s riding roughshod over this country.
Thank you! I’m over my stingy satellite service’s bandwidth limit — so I didn’t have Rush streaming today.. Sorry I missed it!
~~~~~~~~~
You have a big-time reading comprehension problem -- not to mention a misplaced, “It’s all about ME!” ego problem.
My first (and only) general post on this thread was #39, responsive to the article and comment #1, and addressed, properly, (first name on the list) to the OP. It is informational in nature, in that it provides links to documentation of the threats that have been made by the Soros operation to ALL media and USG folks. I copied all posters (up to the time I started composing it) with the information. You should have taken the effort to read the information in #39 before showing your shiny heinie. It correced your mispercaption in your #17: the media hosts are not “ignoring” the issue. They are, under orders, avoiding it...
~~~~~~~~~
The post (#42) to which you took personal exception was NOT addressed to you, It was addressed to Smokeyblue -- in response to Smokeyblue's #40 TO ME. (Note the "To 40" at the bottom). You were merely #6 on the copy list.
Anyhow, as we say here in the deep East Texas PineyWoods, ”It’s the hit dog that hollers!” LOL!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you bother to look, Smokeyblue (whom I copy here because I ‘talked about’ him/her) responded to that same #42 in most gracious fashion...
~~~~~~~~~~~~
”And, just for your edification, I'm a Texan who actually LIVES in Texas, not a pretender. “
You have a great FRProfile; I’ve read it. Too bad you haven’t learned to show others the same consideration. Read my profile. The FRName, "TXnMA" was a protest when we were "exiled" in Yankee country for a spell. As my FRProfile shows, I wanted to change it when we returned to God’s Country over a decade ago -- , but that would have destroyed all links to my lengthy FR history. :-(
FWIW, my military service was 1960 - 1965 (what war was that?) And I have eleven years seniority on you as a Native Texan, but, praise the Lord, my gout doesn’t have me (quite) disabled, yet... ‘-)
It seems to me that we should be allies -- maybe even friends. I’m game, if you are...
I’ll follow this with a FReepMail...
No, YOU posted 3 separate rants and included me in them. Check your posting history. It's not MY ego, it's YOUR posts!!
Here’s the first post you included me in.
And this is the 2nd.
And, baby makes 3.
Ummmmmmm . . . . . . . Korea!!???
:-)
I addressed ONE (1) post TO you (#66 in response to your #55).
All my other communications were CC (Courtesy or Info Copies) to you,
Since you are either unable or unwilling to distinguish between "TO" and "CC", and are unappreciative of both, I will solve the problem:
Go ahead and delete my FReepMail without reading it. (It would only confuse you further...)
I am done with you. Out.
Whether as a CC or TO me, you included me in your addresses and clearly wanted to share your opinion with me. However, on FR, there is no To: and no CC: as there is with email. When I am included in your rant, with NO disclaimer as to your intent, it comes across as being addressed to each recipient equally.
Therefore, I responded in a manner that I felt was appropriate with the comments that had been forwarded to me. So, you can throw insults my way as you please, or we can agree that, perhaps, BOTH of us misunderstood the other's intent and finish this dicussion on a reasonably courteous footing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.