Skip to comments.Is There An Imposter In The White House? An Excerpt from "Hope Is Not A Strategy"
Posted on 03/25/2012 1:43:12 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
There is something very wrong when the sitting president refuses to divulge huge pieces of information about his background. What is he hiding? Maybe the birthers were a little extreme, but is there something wrong with this manufactured candidate, whose history remains sealed from public view? What is he hiding?
Could the Hawaii birth certificate be a forgery? Is there something much worselike sponsorship by an unnamed special interest? I dont know. I do know that the man in the White House now is an imposter. The only question is which kind of an imposter: an incompetent pretender or a genuine phony, a Manchurian candidate, who is a liberal, ½ black and ½ white, and an obvious Muslim sympathizer (despite claims of being a Christianin clear conflict with his non-Christian behavior).
Will this campaign expose him as the imposter, and the pretender his behavior has revealed? Will it expose his hidden history and murky background. We know about his failures and mistakes.
For those who dont, here is another in this series of revealing excerpts from HOPE IS NOT A STRATEGY: Leadership Lessons from the Obama Presidency. The book is now available on www.amazon.com in paperback and Kindle versions. Other in e-book versions are available at www.smashwords.com.
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
While the unknown author (always suspicious of those who won’t sign their names) may be correct about the idiocy of the electorate, the writer is dead wrong claiming that we can survive a Barry S. as president. That is only true if he is limited to ONE term and then replaced. We MUST elect as many true conservatives to the House and Senate as we possibly can. We MUST save our country
Thank you. This has been my mantra for awhile. We MUST do everything possible to limit this man to one term. We MUST elect as many true conservatives as possible to the Huse and Senate
I’ve been around this forum a long time. Seems to me, going back to the Clinton era, a similar story was making the rounds, only in that version it was Bill Clinton.
The article still shows up in “search” at Forbes.com. However, the link the search produces is broken. So, they have not yet fully scrubbed it from their site.
I’ve been around here since 1999 and recall MANY stories about Bill Clinton, but not that one. :)
Not of that nominee is Romney. Romney is a flip-flopper on par with Kerry and, in someone's well-known words "better the devil you know than the one you don't."
When I look at any political candidate, the first thing I ignore is what they say. All of them SAY things they think we want to hear, REGARDLESS whether they believe it! Instead, I go for the substance of the individual and look at what they have done. What Romney has done in the past is NOT a good endorsement of him. And, when I take that in conjunction with the fact that he has backed away from his initial promise to work to repeal ObamaCare, I see someone who is literally the Etch-A-Sketch candidate. IF he ends up as the condidate from the opposition, we will have a repetition of the '08 election. And, Romney, is truly the unknown because we DON'T know what he will do. Based on his record, we DO know that he will NOT be the conservative that we want and need.
So, our choice is death by hanging or death by poison. Either way, it's death. What kind of choice is that!?
Cute. I would suggest that you dust off your copy of the Constitution and understand the powers and responsibilities of each of the different branches of government. The one president we have has less power than the 535 in Congress.
Media blackout on Obama eligibility near-total
Then last week, another regular Townhall columnist, Diana West, wrote Why the Silence About Obamas Historic Scam? but found that it wasnt posted on Townhall at all. Worse, it was déjà vu for West, whose previous column on the same topic likewise was also spiked.
When WND asked West why her last two columns on the subject of Obamas eligibility werent posted on Townhall, she responded: This weeks empty hole where my column on media silence on Sheriff Arpaios press conference would normally go, like last months empty hole where my column on the Atlanta court proceeding on eligibility would normally go, speak for themselves.
“Is There an Imposter in the White House?”
And a similarly deep and perlexing question: is there a Catholic in the Popemobile?
perlexing = perplexing
Bizarre. Link not found. I think the Chicagoland thugs made Forbes take it down. Can’t let stuff like this get out into the mainstream now, can we?
Yeah, what happened to him?
You wrote this in 2008, right?
No, but I'm sure I wrote something very similar.
its gone from that link also!!
Grrrrr, I hate censorship
. . . . See # 74 and 53.
Thanks, WildHighlander57; good catch.
Great quote. Thanks for sharing it.
Recently, I had 2 people who are customers at my small business, tell me “it’s not Obama’s fault” when I lamented that if he gets re-elected the high energy costs that made me lose money last tax year,the first net loss in my life....sorry I was rambling...I said if he gets re-elected I will close my doors and be out of business. Both of these Wisconsin liberal idiots said high energy prices are “not Obama’s fault”.
These 2 do not look like morons, but they ARE morons.
And they will vote for Hussein again I am sure.
They are truly the useful idiots that socialists need to be re-elected.
Thanks for the ping, Lucy!
A Happy Easter To You!
The link has been washed clean.
Here’s the article -
404. Thats an error.
The requested URL /search?q=cache:T_YAGFpnWM8J:www.forbes.com/sites/prospernow/2012/03/24/is-there-an-imposter-in-the-white-house-an-excerpt-from-hope-is-not-a-strategy/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us was not found on this server. Thats all we know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.