Skip to comments.
Calif. wants Arizona immigration law overturned
THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER ^
| March 28, 2012
| THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
Posted on 03/30/2012 7:54:13 AM PDT by Pelham
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Politicians protecting illegal aliens. Instead of supporting AZ 1070 the treason lobby is fighting it.
1
posted on
03/30/2012 7:54:17 AM PDT
by
Pelham
To: Pelham
2
posted on
03/30/2012 7:56:22 AM PDT
by
samtheman
To: Pelham
Yep....California wants Arizona to become the same pit hole that they are.
3
posted on
03/30/2012 7:56:22 AM PDT
by
RC2
To: AuntB; wardaddy; Kenny Bunk; Travis McGee
Sanctuary Nation ping
Sanctuary cities are old hat. Nationwide is the way to go.
4
posted on
03/30/2012 7:57:00 AM PDT
by
Pelham
(Marco Rubio, la raza trojan horse.)
To: Pelham
"Among other things, it makes [it illegal] to be in the country illegally and to seek work"Ya think?
5
posted on
03/30/2012 7:57:12 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(If Romney wins the primary, I am writing-in PALIN)
To: Pelham
,,,, they ought to straighten out their own house first ,,,, and mind their own damned business .
6
posted on
03/30/2012 7:57:12 AM PDT
by
Lionheartusa1
(-: Socialism is the equal distribution of misery :-)
To: Pelham
Retards. they should push to stop illegal immigration in their own state and kick the Feds butt to do the same.
If they like the illegal situation so much that they want to do nothing to suppress it, why complain about getting more of what they obviously support already?
7
posted on
03/30/2012 7:58:56 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Pelham
Normal, law abiding, right thinking, conservative Californians want no such thing.
But we’re not represented anymore, and haven’t been for a long time.
Don’t tar ALL Californians with the same brush! Many more Reaganites still here than the press lets on.
8
posted on
03/30/2012 7:58:56 AM PDT
by
Tigerized
("..and whack 'em, and whack 'em, and whack 'em!' cried the Toad in ecstasy." (also my 2012 strategy))
To: Pelham
In documents filed Tuesday, Harris said the law exceeds state authority, conflicts with national policy and would drive illegal immigrants into other states. Interesting justification for overturning a law - because it works.
9
posted on
03/30/2012 7:59:47 AM PDT
by
Pollster1
(Can we afford as much government as welfare-addicted voters demand?)
To: Pelham
I’m confused. Isn’t the whole reason for California’s sanctuary cities to allow illegal aliens to be there?
To: Pelham
California has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Arizona's tough immigration law, saying it would drive illegal immigrants into other states. thus attesting to the law's efficacy. Meldrim Thompson Jr. would know how to respond to Moonbeam Brown.
11
posted on
03/30/2012 8:01:41 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Steyn: "If Greece has been knocking back the ouzo, we're face down in the vat.")
To: Pelham
Using the same idiotic argument - couldn't high welfare benefit paying States sue another State that wishes to reduce benefits under the rationale that welfare benefit seekers would flee to the other States?
Is not free movement of people between the States - and different laws and circumstances - fifty ‘laboratories of Republic governance’- one of the desired outcomes of having fifty semi-autonomous States?
12
posted on
03/30/2012 8:02:38 AM PDT
by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
To: Pelham
Wait, I thought California liked illegal aliens so much that they forbid any kind of police-ICE cooperation, e-verify, etc. How very puzzling indeed that they are afraid that more illegals would find their way into California’s “sanctuary cities”.
13
posted on
03/30/2012 8:02:49 AM PDT
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: 5thGenTexan
Im confused. Isnt the whole reason for Californias sanctuary cities to allow illegal aliens to be there? No.
The whole reason for Californias sanctuary cities is to encourage, persuade and reward illegal aliens for coming there.
14
posted on
03/30/2012 8:03:24 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Day 1165 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
To: null and void
The whole reason for Californias sanctuary cities is to encourage, persuade and reward illegal aliens for coming there. Well, sounds like the AZ law is helping them meet their goal - they should be thanking them.
:-)
To: Pelham; Mrs. B.S. Roberts
How was it I just KNEW that my state, The Peoples’ Republic of Massachusetts, would be one of the states frantically seeking to bring other states down to its own level?
The I read the entire article and-—there we were!!
16
posted on
03/30/2012 8:06:30 AM PDT
by
CaptainAmiigaf
( NY Times: We print the news as it fits our views.)
To: Pelham
Well then California (its politicians) is just racist not wanting more illegal immigrants! Just declare a few more sanctuary cities, why should it matter if you get them via Arizona or straight from the motherland if you love them so much that you will infringe the rights of citizens, even their right to live,for them?
California and New York-two bullies re:illegal immigration and the Second Amendment.
17
posted on
03/30/2012 8:07:05 AM PDT
by
mrsmel
To: Pelham
saying it would drive illegal immigrants into other states............................................ Well, using California words they understand; “Hey Dudes, Duhhh.”
18
posted on
03/30/2012 8:07:45 AM PDT
by
Bringbackthedraft
( WHO WE ELECT AS PRESIDENT IS NOT AS IMPORTANT AS WHO THEY APPOINT.)
To: 5thGenTexan
19
posted on
03/30/2012 8:08:14 AM PDT
by
mrsmel
To: Pelham
Lib heads will explode if the SCOTUS upholds SB1070!
20
posted on
03/30/2012 8:09:11 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson