Posted on 04/05/2012 9:15:08 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
May I?
To the EGOP..
* You Suck.
* We are tired of giving us the 1st looser the 2nd time around.
* We are tired of the Sandwich you give us, that is not Nutella.
* And your Primaries? Open and running debates with the people that hate us.
* The EGOP needs to have their Collective @$$es handed to them.
I Have seen them in action and the back stabbing they have done to candidates. If I could talk about it you would revile them too...
I wonder how they will manage to fit “I know he sucks but he doesn’t suck as bad as Obama” on a bumper sticker.
Am I the only one who thinks we’re in ‘The Twilight Zone’ ?
“The difference between center-right moderate Romney and
left-liberal Obama is quite large.”
Yep. One’s a communist and one’s a capitalist. In these times and in this particular election, that’s a good enough difference for me. The first order of business should be stopping the Marxist agenda. Once that is accomplished we address the other important issues.
What do you think his REAL FReeper name is? :p
Writing in Sarah Palin. Done with the “Please, Sir, I want some more” game.
And may I add...
To Conservatives....
*Face facts, the GOP HATE us as much as the Commies.
Having been here a dozen years, usually reading through FR at least once a day, I'm amazed at many of these pro-Romney, okay-conservatives-it's-time-to-abandon-all-princples screen names I don't remember ever seeing before.
Far too many Rbots (as in “Republican”) demanding that we must vote party regardless of how left-wing or deceitful the creatures that get put up. Some are willful tools, others are blissfully naive who buy into the schtick of liars like Willard. Fortunately, some of us are smart enough not to get sold a bill of goods a second time. After all, the old saying goes, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.” Anybody who has been warned about him and still refuses to see reason are the ones at fault.
"Though I would carefully avoid giving unnecessary offence, yet I am inclined to believe, that all those who espouse the doctrine of reconciliation, may be included within the following descriptions. Interested men, who are not to be trusted, weak men who CANNOT see, prejudiced men who will not see, and a certain set of moderate men who think better of the European world than it deserves; and this last class, by an ill-judged deliberation, will be the cause of more calamities to this Continent than all the other three." --Thomas Paine, Common Sense, 1776 Though I would carefully avoid giving unnecessary offense, yet I am inclined to believe, that all those who say we must support Mitt Romney, as the Republican nominee for president, may be included within the following descriptions. Establishment Republican hacks, who are not to be trusted, weak men who CANNOT see for themselves but blindly follow the urging of the former, prejudiced men who will not see beyond the Republican Party label, and a certain set of quasi-principled but misinformed men who think better of the Republican Party than it deserves; and this last class, by an ill-judged deliberation, will be the cause of more calamities to this Nation than all the other three. -- J.D. EllisWhat Thomas Paine said of those who favored reconciliation with England in 1776, is now true of those who espouse loyalty to a Republican Party that gives us the most successful liberal governor in our nation's history as a presidential nominee:
Please name all the Republican presidential primary nominees you've supported this year.
Newt? No...Santorum? No...you even trashed Palin when her name was bandied about as a prospective nominee. Your modus operandi has been merely to look at the (R) behind the name and start screeching like a banshee.
Your antipathy toward the GOP isn't about Romney, it's about Republicans.
You're a disingenuous embarrassment to this forum.
Spoken like a true establishment republican hack.
No, it’s not about Republicans. It’s about principle.
A concept foreign to Romney Republicans, obviously.
I do not need a perfect candidate to cast my vote in favor, but he has to be playing on the same ballfield, at minimum. Romney’s playing for the Washington team in a completely different arena. No thanks. I will vote to keep the Congress as a check on the President. I suspect Romney will go down for much the same reason as McCain - no conservative coalition support. As much as I would like to see Obama replaced, I am of the opinion that America can survive his second term if that’s what it takes to render a proper candidate.
Blah blah effing blah. Find a new scriptwriter.
WILL NEVER VOTE ROMNEY,!!!! Congress and senate will fight for!!!
Your attacks aren't reserved for Romney or Romney Republicans. I've seen you attack Newt, Sarah and the rest with equal vitriol. You're an anti-Republican hack.
And a political nobody.
I'll probably hold my nose for three reasons. SCOTUS, Eric Holder, and Kathleen Sebelius. Romney sucks, and I have no illusions of what he really is, but four more years of Obama and his energy policies, judges, Obamacare, injustice department, fast and furious, and arrogance are too much for me to take.
It appears that the mittbots think that our vote is theirs.
FUMR!
I’ll add this. There’s a good argument to be made for those who under any circumstance can’t vote for Romney. However there’s no good argument to stay home and let downticket races suffer. Even if I can’t vote Romney, I’m not going to punish Tim Walberg for that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.