Notice: FR is and will remain a pro-life, small government conservative site.

April 10, 2012 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

To hell with the GOP-e. Barring a miracle, they got their big government, unconstitutional mandate loving, socialist abortionist Obama-lite RINO on the ballot, they can now get him elected.

We are the resistance!!

Shove him down our throats today, we shove him up your donkeys in November!!

I can see November from my house!!

[KC_Lion]

Anything for You my FRiend!

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

Thank you sir, or ma’am.

[DJ MacWoW]

In my opinion, you owe Rick Santorum and his supporters an explanation and an apology for your inaction.

Santorum couldn't beat Romney and YOU think he could beat Obama with the American Pravda backing the Marxist?

[eureka!]

Romney's just like the SCoaMF, Barky 0bama. Romney will rehire Van Jones, Eric Holder, Cass Sunstein and their ilk, will encourage class and race wars, will back stab Israel and other allies, will have rappers and other garbage in the WH, will take months of vacays and golf days each year, hates America and Christians (especially white ones), has a disgusting grifter for a wife who will vacay and partay on your dime (including Lobster and Kobe Beef as a daily course--also on your dime), is Chicago corrupt, lies like a dog on a rug, is a narcissist etc. ad nauseum.

SHEESH. I'M OUTTA HERE.

[prisoner6]

FWIW From the ‘60’s when my father was in local politics and I saw what the PA republican party did to undermine him I swore I would never register republican.

It’s why I have an animosity toward Hilman/RINO republicans.

When Scranton/Schaffer/Hillman promised to support my CONSERVATEVE dad and then backed out in a way that left him twisting in the wind, I vowed to never support them.

[LibLieSlayer]

jeb bush... bank on it. Sorry... I have to go puke up a lung.

LLS

[jersey117]

I think it’s pretty crummy that newt pretty much declared Romney the winner, waited for Rick to drop out and ia now Trinh to fund raise off of it.

[Quix]

INDEED.

LET GOD ARISE

AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED.

. . . those who loved not their own lives more than the cause of Christ and FREEDOM IN JESUS and HE IN US . . .

[tomkat]

[who knows what evil?]

If Romney is the GOP-E nominee, I know that I am writing in Sarah Louise Palin. My state permits write-in votes. I want to make sure my vote will be recorded and published in the newspaper for posterity.

Ditto.

[Carry me back]

Time to start a new party and call it the Christian or conservative party. Knock the gop out and don’t take their big money donors in. They are socialist control freaks. Big money corporations are killing freedom.

[Only Sane Man]

Well, Newt hasn’t given up — hell, I’d vote for the crazy old gnome before I’d vote for Governor Etch-A-Sketch!

[so_real]

I will agree that Romney is liberal, but one thing he is not is ANTI-American.

Please elaborate. What exactly does this liberal stand for that is not ANTI-American? Perhaps your definition of what America represents differs from mine. By large, all things that push towards a progressive liberal agenda push away from a Constitutional American foundation. That's why they call it "progressive" and "liberal". Romney is woefully inadequate to be the standard bearer for anything conservative ... anything "PRO-American". Romney doesn't "hate" America ... Neither does Obama. So what? Neither is willing, even capable, of returning America to her conservative values, because they do not share them.

[Sirius Lee]

And I do think that a much more conservative House and Senate will help shape Mitt's agenda..

You've got it backwards. A GOPe House and Senate will rubber stamp every leftwinged, harebrained, government expanding, liberty squelching, abortion funding, muslim loving, gun grabbing scheme that Mittens comes up with.

[TBP]

Here is an alternative:

http://www.tomhoefling.com/

[eureka!]

ibtz, newbie. gonna be lots of you trolls here. you’ll apparently have lots of fans as you bash Mittens. *spit*

[Quix]

Will have to prayerfully ponder your reasonable thoughts and words.

THX THX.

The Bible Codes SEEM to indicate that Romney has been appointed as the next figurehead in the White House.

[cableguymn]

Any Republican nominee is better than Obama!

---

You can keep telling yourself that. But your just in denial.

[SoConPubbie]

You know he will. His next choice will be a black lesbian.

That's funny because that's probably what Romney will do with his allegiance to the Gay Agenda, implementing the first Gay Marriage in all of the US, and then nominating 27 Democrats out of 36 nominations, many of them far left-wing, progressive liberals, just like himself.

Legal analysts say candidate Romney is different from Gov. Romney.

Liberty Counsel Action Vice President Matt Barber said Romney’s appointments were constitutional “living document” poster children.

“Many of Romney’s appointments were not only liberal, not only Democrats, but were radical counter-constitutionalists. How on earth can we expect that, as president, he would be any different?” Barber asked rhetorically.

“Actions speak louder than words, and Mitt Romney’s actions as governor scream from the rooftops that he cannot be trusted with this most important of presidential responsibilities.”

Barber cites two specific examples of Romney’s radical appointments.

“As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney not only failed in this regard, he appointed a number of very liberal, if not radical, ‘living, breathing’-minded judges to the bench,” Barber said.

“Two that come to mind were extreme homosexualists Marianne C. Hinkle and Stephen Abany,” he said. “They both had a long history of pro-gay activism, yet Romney didn’t hesitate to put them on the bench.”

“These are people who outrageously believe the postmodern notion that newfangled ‘gay rights’ trump our constitutionally guaranteed First Amendment rights,” he said.

Baldwin agreed, citing Romney’s statements about the two requirements he actually used when selecting judges.

“Romney did focus on two criteria: their legal experience and whether they would be tough on crime. In other words, the nominee could be a gay activist or a pro-big government, pro-quota, pro-gun control Democrat Party hack who detests every judicial principle treasured by our founding fathers,” Baldwin said. “But if he happens to be tough on crime and have prosecutorial experience, he gets past the Romney filter. Many of Romney’s nominees fit that description.”

[Freethinker05]

Hell yes! No RINO for me, thank you. Why vote for someone who is no better than Obama? What we really need to do is gather around a TRUE Conservative candidate, no matter the cost. The GOP will keep using us as pawns, ignoring us and running liberal RINO candidates until we SHOW THEM that they can’t just beat us around and expect us to vote for whatever fraud they decide to run that year.

My vote will almost certainly be third party, this year.