Posted on 04/10/2012 4:41:33 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
Republican Senator Scott Brown and his chief Democratic challenger, Elizabeth Warren, are now running neck-and-neck in Massachusetts’ red-hot U.S. Senate race.
The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Massachusetts shows Warren edging Brown by one point, 46% to 45%. One percent (1%) likes some other candidate in the race, and eight percent (8%) are undecided.
(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...
This one could go either way.
why support Brown? he’s just 0bama-lite like Romney.
Yikes...I can hardly imagine a scarier scenario than Obama in the White House and Warren in the Senate. We Conservative have alot of work to do before November....
Perhaps Romney should get his butt up there and support Brown by telling all how severely conservative he is!
Yep we do!
Vote Constitution Party!
I don’t expect Brown to lose... BUT... Willard (if he definitively hijacks the GOP nod) could cause a terrible downballot problem (as McCain did).
A difference without a distinction. Brown only sounds conservative when he needs votes. How about he makes written pledges to vote against all democrat legislation...
A guy named Tom Lang published all the names of those who signed a petition against gay marriage in Mass., obviously hoping they would be harassed. Scott Brown invited the same Tom Lang and his ‘husband’ to Washington for the traiterous signing of the repeal of ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’. See what you get Scott in return Scotty? You’re effectively tied with an evil, commie hag. Give them a choice between a democrat and a democrat and they’ll pick the democrat every time.
I said I'd never do it again but, crap, Dizzy-Lizzy? Ugh....I may have to vote for Brown (2 years ago I thought it may be better, in hindsight, to vote for Coakley - just to get her out of being AG in MA - she stinks!)
And it looks like Mittens is going to be the stupid nominee - but nothing says we can't rally and Tea Party protest against him
(when he's potus....ducking)
I can't survive another 4 years of Barry- I'm not financially stable enough....I'm buckling....ugh
Sheesh, can the liberals in Massachusetts suck any more?
It looks like Warren is going to have to spend some big bucks getting the DemocRAT voter fraud thing kicked in gear.
Brown wins by a larger % than he did against Coakley (5%).
Did you notice -
The people who fall for this aren’t from Mass.
Brown is plenty Left center for Mass voters.
More BS from the rat rasmussen.
Months out from the election, Ras the rat publishes phoney polls that the commie is winning. That’s designed to supress conservative turn-out and depress conservatives. Then two days before the election, he breathlessly announces that the Republican is surging and will win. That’s designed to preserve his credibility.
There’s a small number of Freepers who fall for the rascrap and believe he’s Rasputin.
Brown has voted for some REALLY bad bills. But, at least there's a ~50% chance he MIGHT vote the “right” way on some things.
Warren, OTOH, would make Fidel Castro look Reaganesque by comparison.
Actually, Rasmussen refused to pick a winner in Brown vs. Coakley, even though most other pollsters had Brown winning.
Like I've posted a few times here on FR, Rasmussen is WAY overrated IMO. PPP, although they lean left, has been more accurate in their polling.
“PPP, although they lean left, has been more accurate in their polling.”
I agree. PPP came closest to the final results in the SC Republican primary.
They’ve been very good overall (PPP).
Rasmussen...not so much. Personally, I don’t follow him anymore.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.