Skip to comments.
Virgil Goode Polling 5% in Virginia
Independent Political Report ^
| May 1st, 2012
Posted on 05/02/2012 9:47:32 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 last
To: Sirius Lee; Jim Robinson
Okay, that’s it. If that’s the level of conversation on FR now, I’m out.
81
posted on
05/02/2012 1:06:00 PM PDT
by
Moonmad27
("I'm not bad, I'm just drawn that way." Jessica Rabbit)
To: Kevin C
Goode voted for Dick Gephardt over Newt Gingrich for Speaker of the House twice. Can this guy really be trusted?
Reagan was a Democrat at one time, can he really be trusted?
To: pgkdan
Just checking. Sarcasm isn’t always easy to spot in print.
83
posted on
05/02/2012 1:27:19 PM PDT
by
SoldierDad
(Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
To: Kevin C
To: muawiyah
Sounds like an excellent idea. If you can elect only a fraction of those it would still be a good start.
Unfortunately it should have started in 2008 or earlier, but better late than never.
85
posted on
05/02/2012 1:31:22 PM PDT
by
NathanR
To: Moonmad27
Pures don’t ‘converse’ - that would imply they actually cared what someone else had to say. Instead they make Onanistic little statements to reinforce how cool they are.
To: Hegewisch Dupa; Moonmad27
Moomad's whining was over the level of discourse - this after his own shrill onanistic little statement that FR would be "outlawed" if Mitt didn't win. And then there's your little gem:
Pures dont converse - that would imply they actually cared what someone else had to say. Instead they make Onanistic little statements to reinforce how cool they are.
Looks like you spilled some on yours or Moonmad's on your Berkenstocks.
87
posted on
05/02/2012 2:23:03 PM PDT
by
Sirius Lee
(Sofa King Mitt Odd Did Obamneycare)
To: Moonmad27
Well, bye.
88
posted on
05/02/2012 2:26:39 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: pgkdan; cripplecreek
Virginia is not a ‘swing state’ this time. McDonnell and the Mittbots made sure of that ~
89
posted on
05/02/2012 3:05:32 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
I know you got screwed in VA with only Romney and Ron Paul on the presidential primary ballot, and I’m sure you have good reasons to want to create a new party in VA (although I would posit that it would be easier to retake the GOP than to run a third-party candidate and have the Dems win by default; and isn’t Bob McDonnell like 100 times more conservative than Doug Wilder?). That being said, Virgil Goode is running for president, not for state senator or Lt. Governor, and if he takes 3% of the vote in VA it could throw the state (and likely the presidency) to Obama. If anything, Goode’s role as a spoiler would doom any chance your nascent conservative movement would have of succeeding.
90
posted on
05/02/2012 3:24:38 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: AuH2ORepublican
Nope, not talking about a NEW PARTY, but a really serious reform of the Virginia Republican party ~ we have a whole big bunch of relatively Conservative African Americans around here who dote on Doug Wilder and actually seek out his political counsel.
There's no reason they have to be tied down over there with the union thugs and nonprofit industry in Alexandria.
Part of the reform will be to look at the record to seek out and REMOVE current establishment and Mittbot types from positions of party leadership, or membership in the state legislature.
If that crowd want to participate in politics they should go where they are welcome.
91
posted on
05/02/2012 3:34:32 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: AuH2ORepublican
BTW, McDonnell is a faux conservative ~ and Wilder is hardly a Leftwingtard ~ his "rainy day fund" approach (save some in good times to pay for the bad times to come) is incredibly conservative.
The Democrat big dogs were terribly unhappy with him during his term as Governor.
92
posted on
05/02/2012 3:38:17 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: randita
The Republicans can do something about it. They can dump the lying Socialist from getting nominated.
93
posted on
05/02/2012 4:09:09 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
To: TigersEye
Well, bye. If I recall correctly, things didn't turn out so great for Curly Bill.
94
posted on
05/02/2012 6:01:30 PM PDT
by
Drew68
(I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
To: Drew68
Things turned out great for me though.
95
posted on
05/02/2012 7:03:03 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: AuH2ORepublican
It is important to get behind Romney so that we get more Souters on the Supreme Court and less Kagans.
96
posted on
05/05/2012 10:56:08 AM PDT
by
rhinohunter
(Not voting for etchamitt...no way...no how)
To: rhinohunter
No, we’ll get one Thomas and maybe one Souter (but perhaps an Alito) instead of one Ginsburg and one Breyer. That’s the difference between overturning Roe and cementing it for decades to come.
97
posted on
05/05/2012 8:44:51 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson