Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frank discussion re our loss to Obama/Romney and the future direction of FR and tea party movement
Click here to pledge your support! ^ | May 4, 2012 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 05/04/2012 6:31:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

My FRiends, we might as well face the reality that we the combined pro-life conservative movement and tea party coalition have lost this round (the presidential election) in the larger battle to reclaim our constitution and our inalienable rights. Rove, Romney and the GOP-e have successfully destroyed and driven off each and every pro-life conservative tea party candidate from the race and all have surrendered to the Romney camp. It is no secret that Romney is not one of us. There is absolutely no doubt that he has never accomplished a single conservative thing in his entire political career (one term as liberal governor of liberal Massachusetts and six years campaigning for president). In Massachusetts, he undeniably championed abortion, gay rights, global warming, gun control, big government statist mandated/socialized health care programs, liberal judges, TARP, bailouts, stimulus spending, debt limit increases, etc, and even though he's recently claimed a complete reversal in political beliefs and no longer despises pro-life conservatives or the time of Reagan-Bush, I still don't trust him. He still stubbornly holds on to some of his statist beliefs, like global warming, gays in the military, RomneyCare, stimulus spending, etc, so there is no way I can vote for him or join Cain, Perry, Bachmann, Newt or any others who are endorsing him. But I will not act on my prior promises that I would actively campaign against him if he wins the nomination. Our combined movement is already torn and splintered and is going to have to be mended if we're going to have any impact whatsoever against the liberal/progressives and statists after the election. To that end I propose a TRUCE among our conservative forces during the remainder of this election cycle.

We conservatives have already lost the presidency to either the Dems or the GOP-e, and if we tear the tea party apart, if we tear the pro-life movement apart, if we tear FR apart then we lose it all. It's far more important that we re-unite and live to fight another day. Even if we can't vote for a true conservative for the presidency, it's doubly important that we all turn out on election day or sooner and drag our friends, neighbors, relatives, co-workers, etc, to the polls to vote straight conservative for every slot on our ballots. The only way we can win our freedom back is to vote out the liberal progressives and vote in as many liberty loving conservatives as is humanly possible into every elected office at every level of government all across this great land. To prevent a total loss to the dems or GOP-e, we must continue the tea party rebellion into November and beyond. Whatever else you may do, you must turn out and vote straight tea party conservative down ticket!!

We must continue expanding our inroads into the state houses and into every elective office in the land. We must continue building on our majority in the house and we must retake the senate!! We must help the conservative governors and state legislatures to fully restore the ninth and tenth amendments and reclaim the real political power away from the federal usurpers and return it to the states and the people per the constitution!! This way, regardless of who wins the presidency, we can cut his unconstitutional expansionist movements off at the knees. And if any executive, civil officer or judge dares commit impeachable offenses, we must hold the majorities so we can impeach and remove them from office!!

And we must salvage and rebuild and continue strengthening our conservative pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-borders, pro-constitution, pro-small government, pro-defense, pro-liberty movements and our tea party coalition. And we must stop ripping each other apart!!

Therefore I hereby propose a general truce among our conservative forces!!

The Republic we save may be our own!!

As far as FR's finances go, we're in the same boat as the rest of the economy and will have to make do with what we can raise. Fortunately, the big debts we ran up a couple years ago have been paid off. We borrowed approx $20,000 a few years ago from two FReepers to fund our national convention, plus we ran up another $20,000 in legal fees during the last couple of years fighting off Righthaven. But those are now behind us and paid off. We also did quite a bit of traveling each year for the last three years on cross country tea party tours, but I think we can now cut that back and remove it from our budget requirements. If we're fortunate enough to not incur any additional legal costs or equipment costs (other than what we've already planned), and cut the travel and a few other areas, we should be able to tighten our belts enough to weather the storm even if we fail to reach our short term fundraising goals.

Whatever the outcome of the elections, we are prepared to roar into 2013 with the tea party chewing up liberal/progressives and RINOs and raising hell in our never ending fight for liberty!!

We are the resistance!!

Let's take the enemy head-on instead of fighting each other!!

Damn the torpedoes, full steam ahead!!


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Free Republic; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; adminlectureseries; bachmann; cain; elections; freepathon; freerepublic; freerepublichistory; gingrich; gop; gope; jimrobinson; newt; obama; perry; prayer; romney; santorum; teaparty; truce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 701-750751-800801-850 ... 1,501-1,525 next last
To: humblegunner; Admin Moderator; Allegra; Darksheare
Oh, heck! That was a dark day in FReeper history.

Correct! It is from the FR cult classic "housewife/modmin admin" thread

btw, did you ever get your samwich from the housewife admin?

751 posted on 05/04/2012 1:41:26 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 734 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“Really? Both houses of Congress and the entire population of the country will just suddenly fall into comas and be silent?”

Yeah, really. Just like the coma they’ve been in while O’Bunghole got Obamacare, an increased debt ceiling, unbridled mid-East meddling (including financial support for the Muslim Brotherhood), Fast and Furious, etc., etc., etc. A symbolic write-in vote will “weaken” that agenda like a fart in a hurricane.


752 posted on 05/04/2012 1:41:51 PM PDT by Magic Fingers (Political correctness mutates in order to remain virulent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers

It will just take all that much longer to root out socialism if Obama is re-elected. Keep electing more and more hard core conservatives to counter and finally turn back the garbage!


753 posted on 05/04/2012 1:43:38 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 741 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers; reaganaut
MF to RN: Call it what you must; it’s important that you feel special.

That's Magic Fingers' way of calling reaganaut's decision to reject Romney an egotistical bit of vanity. Interestingly, MF is the one calling it what he/she MUST.

754 posted on 05/04/2012 1:44:05 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I don’t know about others, but I personally cannot vote for Romney, but I will turn out and vote for every conservative on my ballot.

Jim, you and I are somewhat fortunate in the fact that we live in a state where our vote in the presidential race is meaningless - Obama will probably win CA by 20 points. So we can choose not to vote for Romney without it having any actual effect on the outcome. For those who are in swing states where their vote actually can have an impact, I hope they will hold their nose and vote against Obama.

755 posted on 05/04/2012 1:44:22 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

It’s the responsibility of individual voters to first verify the validity of write-in votes with their own County recorder.

I’d never risk my ballot’s destruction by a faulty write-in vote.


756 posted on 05/04/2012 1:45:19 PM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Good, except BEWARE of the write-in vote danger of trashing your whole ballot. Vote instead for an official other-party candidate on the ballot. See other posts on this thread about that!


757 posted on 05/04/2012 1:46:38 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
"Because fish ain’t on the menu. ***Sad but true in the GOP fish restaurant."

Yep, nobody offered me any of Mitsters money to throw this down the gut..he doesn't have enough money to buy the soul of every conservative out there.

We were looking for some Savory Barracuda and Green TEA and we got Imitation Crab, and Blue Koolaid. The rules of the free market still apply...the customer is walking.

758 posted on 05/04/2012 1:46:38 PM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: Road Glide; ZULU; Alamo-Girl; onyx

Dittos to that!!!!

It doesn’t matter who we get in the election, if we don’t stop the brainwashing of our children. The greatest of our past is absolutely being lost.

Our kids go to a classical Christian school so they are getting some of that Western Civilization, but even there it is not conservative enough. One of the main history teachers is a “compassionate” liberal (pro life, Christian, but believes that the answer to all social problems should be through government. She believes in private business, etc - not a complete socialist but defintely thinks throwing money at any social or poverty problem via government programs is the answer). She has a big influence there because she teaches several important history and rhetoric classes, and I am dismayed when I see how often the kids choose to solve a social problem for their junior rhetoric project with some kind of government program. They aren’t being taught to think through what it means to be a conservative Biblical Christian and how to apply that to public policy problem solving. I think teachers like this are not uncommon even in the best Christian or secular private schools, becuase what they are being taught at the instotution where they got their Masters or Doctorate was this same progressive thinking!

So it is hard to find this kind of teaching even in private schools! (I’m sending a letter to our headmaster again about this ) If I had money and funding I’d start a similar school to the one my kids go to, but MUCH more conservative in the worldview and doctrine taught.

How about this for starters: http://constitution.hillsdale.edu/
Hillsdale College constitution 101

I believe Christian colleges should get permission to adapt this for a dual credit U.S. Government high school/college credit course. There are tons of high school kids now , whether homeschooled, public or private school, who are not going the traditional route to graduation and all kinds of flexibility is opening up on what they do to get their senior year’s credits. To me this is just a no-brainer to have this available a very low cost - word would get out via internet, facebook, etc. It could be seen as a cool “alternative” to the “establishment” brainwashing available. They could get all the basics of how U.S. governemtn works, but also get all the wonderful foundation of the worldviews, natural law, Biblical law, etc that fed into Constitutional thought.

Sorry so long but this is one of my hot-button issues with three teenagers. I’m going to make them go through the Hillsdale College course with my husband and me as a family this summer. Ha. I can hear the groans already so wish me luck :-)


“But our bigger problem, in my mind, is what is going on in the “educational” system. American Children are being taught a revised, biased, false story about western civilization and America. They are leaving schools with no knowledge of what America is, and how we evolved to become the world’s first and most successful democratic Republic. And so, they become ready tinder for minds like Obama’s.”

Just a thought....

What is needed is an integrated network of private schools that will again teach from the perspective that Western Civilization was (and is) superior, and teach with a true account of the facts of history (rather than the “rewritten history” of the post-1960’s).

Kind of like I remember receiving in public (yes, public!) schools in the 1950’s and early 1960’s before the lefties took it over.


759 posted on 05/04/2012 1:51:21 PM PDT by boxlunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

“Funny how some are so concerned about the large number of ‘symbolic protest votes’.”

I am not “concerned” about symbolic protest votes. I was responding to a comment that such a vote would somehow (unexplained) weaken the liberal agenda. However, I’m happy to have given you an opportunity to hawk your seething Romney rage for the 10,000th time.


760 posted on 05/04/2012 1:52:07 PM PDT by Magic Fingers (Political correctness mutates in order to remain virulent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 746 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe; Jim Robinson; onyx

What you said.

Of all the posts, I like your simplicity the best.

What Jim has said probably changes little on the passion of the discourse on FR, but makes it a little more wide open for the fearful to tout their great courage in voting for Romney to “save us all from Obama”.

I hope I can live up to your post, and doubt that I will very consistently, but you are absolutely right.

Because Romney is a self-professed Progressive right along with the Black Progressive Caucas, including Maxine Waters, Barbara Lee, and also Hillary Clinton & Brac Obama, I have to go with the conscience I have, vote someone else and trust God for the rest.

There are those who are so afraid they just can’t care about that, so why would God want to intervene?

See, already I can’t keep an opinon to myself! :)


761 posted on 05/04/2012 1:53:52 PM PDT by RitaOK (Nevermind, Newt. Forget the convention. I'm trusting God for the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food
Yeah, I know things have changed in Russia, but it was too much to go into and I needed an example. But I disagree about "United Russia". If you've traveled to Russia lately you know you have to provide two sets of visa papers. One is for the KGB. UR is just the party in another dress.

(my favorite was the Beer and Pretzel Party...or something like that)

762 posted on 05/04/2012 1:54:09 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies]

To: donna

Term limits seem like a stupid idea to me. It just takes power away from the voters. It would probably lead to a younger Congress, which would almost certainly make it more liberal. It would remove in equal proportion liberal and conservative legislators, so there’s no automatic net loss to be suffered by one side. Plus there’s every likelihood any location will elect a new person of the same political stripe.

Not to mention, it’s the fear of being voted out and the incentive of being reelected that helps hold politicians’ feet to the fire. Isn’t the line about Obama that he would be more dangerous in his second term when he didn’t have to worry about being reelected? Of course. Term limits give politicians more incentive to be destructive and dangerous.

So why spend the effort pushing for term limits when there are no clear gains to be made and a removal of a good incentive in the current system? We already have the power to vote out whoever we want on election day and have shown that we can and will do it.


763 posted on 05/04/2012 1:54:09 PM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: SAWTEX
I need the ability to donate with a visa debit as that is the only plastic I use.

I donate via a debit card because, like you, it is the only plastic I use. Has not been a problem. IMHO, give it a shot and see what happens.

If you don't want to do that, ask your bank for their suggestions.

764 posted on 05/04/2012 1:54:15 PM PDT by upchuck (Need is not an acceptable lifestyle choice; dependent is not a career. ~ Dr. Tim Nerenz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Just trying be be realistic here, but Texas (along with other states) hasn't voted in the primary, and I expect Gingrich will be on the ballot for the primary.

Has a candidate who suspended his campaign ever gone on to win a primary? Not asking rhetorically, I don't know the answer.

765 posted on 05/04/2012 1:54:22 PM PDT by MaxFlint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 736 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Therefore, I will take my ball and go home.


766 posted on 05/04/2012 1:55:08 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Our faction has OUTFITS!!!! Woot! Woot!


767 posted on 05/04/2012 1:57:33 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 731 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
There is little appetite for sitting this election out or wasting votes on 3rd party's or write-in's.

My vote, nor any other free abiding citizens vote is never a wasted vote....An 'unprincipled vote' is the only wasted vote.....you're helping 'to preserve the status quo' you probably despise.

Voting for what you believe is never a wasted vote....I believe 'Romney and Obama are socialists' and bad for our country,.... therefore I will vote conservative... of which neither are.

768 posted on 05/04/2012 1:58:26 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Our faction has OUTFITS!!!! Woot! Woot!


769 posted on 05/04/2012 1:58:36 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 731 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

My vote in the Primary will be a vote in support of the US Constitution and against Socialism, Marxism, Fascism, State-ism, Big Government, or a New World Order.

At this point, there is about to be only one way left to do that on the Republican Primary ticket, for those of us that have not had their primary yet.

The fact that we have allowed Ron Paul be the Republican Party’s only remaining outspoken supporter of the Constitution speaks volumes about what we are up against.

Obama has swung the nation’s pendulum so far away from the Constitution that nothing short of an equal or greater swing back towards it has any hope of preserving our Republic.

To those of you that think swinging it back just a little with Romney is good enough, well, good luck with that...

How do you think we got here in the first place?


770 posted on 05/04/2012 1:58:57 PM PDT by EasySt (Life is precious. Live it well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies]

To: Finny; reaganaut

“That’s Magic Fingers’ way of calling reaganaut’s decision to reject Romney an egotistical bit of vanity.”

No, that’s Magic Fingers’ way of responding to the blubber hereon by some who have had a special valve installed so they can blow smoke up their own a$$es, telling all that God smiles especially on them because they’re not going to vote for Romney...and that He frowns on anyone who thinks otherwise. If either of you are not one of those goofballs, sorry - it wasn’t intended for you. If you are, it was.


771 posted on 05/04/2012 1:59:07 PM PDT by Magic Fingers (Political correctness mutates in order to remain virulent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: MNlurker

I still have my hazmat suit I used when voting for Bush 41 in 1992 and for Dole in 1996 and McCain in 2008.


772 posted on 05/04/2012 1:59:09 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Democrats are dangerous and evil. Republicans are just useless and useful idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
You want Realville?

Romney has a solidly documented record of being FOR all the things we conservatives are against -- state-run health care, abortion, activist judges, global warming regulation, and the gay agenda. Realville: you're willing to vote FOR that, to make that deal with the devil, in order to avoid Obama. In Realville, a deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition.

773 posted on 05/04/2012 2:02:00 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 529 | View Replies]

To: caww
You’re not listening to the reasons people are giving you why Ron Paul isn’t supported.

I've read what's been given. I just believe that "reason" must be based in fact or reality. Simply because one says something or "believes" something to be true, doesn't mean it is true. There's only one poster I have not responded to with sound argument. And his post is very long and very involved. I don't have the mental energy at this time to respond to it, but I "heard" the reasons.

Also, I'm not questioning "why Paul isn't supported"; I'm asking why Romney and not Paul. No one has given me a solid answer in response to that question.

as many Paul supporters you’re in denial.

I'm a Palin supporter. Questioning is not the same as denying.

Further he’s been protecting Romney’s flank from day one.

Can you give me specific actions or even words that Ron Paul has made (at least three examples) that would make this a valid statement?

774 posted on 05/04/2012 2:02:38 PM PDT by MSSC6644 (Defeat Satan: pray the Rosary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 747 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
We must continue expanding our inroads into the state houses and into every elective office in the land. We must continue building on our majority in the house and we must retake the senate!! We must help the conservative governors and state legislatures to fully restore the ninth and tenth amendments and reclaim the real political power away from the federal usurpers and return it to the states and the people per the constitution

Rome wasn't built in a day. Neither was the colossus that is now federal government. We need to consistently chip it away and put in its place a cultural, societal, and economic framework for which our founders in their wisdom and vast knowledge laid the groundwork.

Keep pushing at the local level and in the federal legislature.

Onward & upward.

775 posted on 05/04/2012 2:02:47 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

You never said it was posted here. More delays from you. You made the claim, back it up or I will just take it to mean that you have no support for your bogus claim that not voting for Romney will VOID my entire ballot.

Other races do not depend upon who I vote for for POTUS.


776 posted on 05/04/2012 2:06:45 PM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: MaxFlint
Newt doesn't have to win. He has to keep Romney from locking up enough undisputed delegates to secure the nomination. And then it goes to the floor. And from there, anything can happen.

/johnny

777 posted on 05/04/2012 2:07:08 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 765 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut
1 1/6th
778 posted on 05/04/2012 2:07:26 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]

To: Finny
Obama is beatable even if he's re-elected

How? Will he be thrown out by the courts? He hasn't been so far. Will he be impeached and convicted in the senate?

Republicans couldn't accomplish that with Clinton and they had DNA proof of perjury.

If Obama wins odds are he serves another four full years.

Don't try to minimize it with pie in the sky hopes.

779 posted on 05/04/2012 2:07:26 PM PDT by MaxFlint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

This speaks , no SHOUTS, your true honorable character.
We are so lucky you are there.


780 posted on 05/04/2012 2:07:42 PM PDT by RWGinger (Simpl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LTC.Ret

Thanks!


781 posted on 05/04/2012 2:08:23 PM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

How he slip in there??

You can SEE I was on 776!


782 posted on 05/04/2012 2:08:39 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U; reaganaut; Bikkuri; jimrob; All
“I am still going to write in Palin (if the convention doesn’t go through).”

In some states you have to be careful about ‘write in’ voting.

I was told by a poll worker ( the one handing out ballots ) that if you ‘wrote-in’ anyone that didn't register in advance as a ‘write-in candidate, it was a spoiled ballot and wouldn't be counted.

You'd be wise to check beforehand; I can state that the ballot won't be voided in Maine: "If a voter writes in a write-in space the name of a person who has not filed a declaration of write-in candidacy as provided by section 722-A , the vote for that office may not be counted except in accordance with section 737-A, subsection 2-A." - http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/21-a/title21-Asec696.html

783 posted on 05/04/2012 2:09:16 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Newt doesn't have to win. He has to keep Romney from locking up enough undisputed delegates to secure the nomination. And then it goes to the floor. And from there, anything can happen.

I would love nothing more than for that to happen. Even though it would probably damage the nominee's chances and lead to a Goldwater scale debacle it would be the greatest show on Earth.

But I wouldn't bet on it.

784 posted on 05/04/2012 2:14:00 PM PDT by MaxFlint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay

Go forth, my child, and sin no more.


785 posted on 05/04/2012 2:14:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is on!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 766 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

To me, the Presidential Race comes down to the relative light reflectivity of your jailer / executioner.

- - —
Perfect choice of words.


786 posted on 05/04/2012 2:14:22 PM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
Sure they have anchovies, but barely anyone chooses them and they will never be a winner with the public.

I know I said I order extra large pizzas in case someone shows up late for dinner but I didn't mean I was inviting the public. Furthermore if guests don't like what I order that's too bad.

787 posted on 05/04/2012 2:16:36 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 748 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

The primary is my one and only chance to send him a REAL message!

- - - - -
You aren’t sending him ANY message. He doesn’t care how many votes he gets in the Primary, he knows weaklings will vote for him in the general under the misguided notion that he is better than Obama.


788 posted on 05/04/2012 2:16:46 PM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: MSSC6644
I'm asking why Romney and not Paul. No one has given me a solid answer in response to that question.

Because Ron Paul is a freakin' kook-wad and Romney at least pretends to be a sane human being.

Granted, Romney is a gun-grabbing socialist douchebag but he doesn't have aliens and troofers among his supporters.

It's a matter of degree.

And Ron Paul is many degrees out-of-level.

789 posted on 05/04/2012 2:16:54 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies]

To: MSSC6644
I'm not in Romney's court but opposing both he and Obama so I cannot help you understand people's who would secure Romney over PAul....they did the same thing with Newt when he was still running.....basically their vote was a vote against Newt...and Paul.

Many swallowed the Santorum bait...and it worked. But as projected until he hit the wall in PA....but then he knew he would and so did the GOP.

Paul just isn't in this to win...and his desires are to be heard ...and speaking his mind.

If it were to go to converntion Paul will release his delegates to Romney....he's there to protect him.

790 posted on 05/04/2012 2:17:04 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut
Other races do not depend upon who I vote for for POTUS.

There seems to be a lot of confusion on this.

I check (on the web) numerous county clerks offices from many states.

It appears that the only thing you need to be concerned about is if you mark a straight party ticket and then write in the name. Once, you write in a name, the straight party ticket becomes invalid. So, just mark every selection individually and there should be no problem.

791 posted on 05/04/2012 2:17:29 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Well said.


792 posted on 05/04/2012 2:19:21 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (The epitome of stupidity is a member of a proven racist sect running against a black man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: MaxFlint
I'm not going to bet on anything. I'm going to keep working to refuse the nomination to Romney. Since he doesn't have the undisputed delegates for a locked-in nomination, it is in the realm of the possible.

/johnny

793 posted on 05/04/2012 2:20:25 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies]

To: caww

Very well said.


794 posted on 05/04/2012 2:21:56 PM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 724 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

Bottom line is, when you go into the voting booth in November you have 2 choices. Cast a vote for the GOP nominee or for Obama. There is no other outcome possible. A vote for anyone other than the GOP nominee is a vote for Obama. Decide who you intend to help elect, and decide wisely.


795 posted on 05/04/2012 2:23:12 PM PDT by Concho (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 786 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Yep so much for the ‘truce’, eh?


796 posted on 05/04/2012 2:25:25 PM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers

Good points.


797 posted on 05/04/2012 2:25:38 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies]

To: MaxFlint
If Obama wins odds are he serves another four full years.

Sure, but if Romney wins, we are guaranteed to have a left winger in the White House for at least 8 more years.

798 posted on 05/04/2012 2:26:03 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]

To: onyx; humblegunner

I’m voting for an actual candidate, just not Obama OR Romney.

Virgil Goode will be on our ballot.


799 posted on 05/04/2012 2:26:56 PM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Amen! Thank you very much, Cringing Negativism Network!!


800 posted on 05/04/2012 2:27:38 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is on!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 701-750751-800801-850 ... 1,501-1,525 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson