To: bd476; SunkenCiv
He cites Freysteinn Sigmundsson at the Nordic Volcanological Center at the University of Iceland in Reykjavik, who says: Reduction of pressure enabled mantle rocks to melt....... My old friend, PV = nRT begs to differ, and tells me that the temperature was higher when the pressure was higher.
Catastrophism ping?
5 posted on
05/08/2012 12:01:17 AM PDT by
Explorer89
(And now, let the wild rumpus start!!)
To: Explorer89
LOL, it's as if they can't help themselves.
After all, there's gold in them thar hills of climate change. Something to consider is how much this new Gold Rush will cost us taxpayers.
6 posted on
05/08/2012 12:14:04 AM PDT by
bd476
To: Explorer89
In this particular case, the ideal gas law doesn’t hold, and rocks can indeed melt on decompression due to changes in the chemical potential of stable phases becoming unstable with subsequent dissolution back into the melt. That said, the theory this scientist is pushing is preposterous on the face of it, due to energy budget considerations, and known tectonic mechanisms.
13 posted on
05/08/2012 12:53:43 AM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: Explorer89
Due to thermal expansion most materials become less dense with increasing temperature. That aside, I have often wondered if quakes or vocanic eruptions could be,in part, caused or facilitated by land tides.
18 posted on
05/08/2012 1:31:05 AM PDT by
monocle
To: Explorer89
BTW PV = nRT is Boyles GAS law.
19 posted on
05/08/2012 1:36:14 AM PDT by
monocle
To: Explorer89; 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
A total lack of physics education appears to be a prerequisite among the pro-AGW demagogues. Thanks Explorer89 for that excellent comment and the ping.
46 posted on
05/08/2012 8:26:32 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson