Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Time to start acting like team players, GOP-e...
1 posted on 05/09/2012 6:52:27 AM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: Qbert

Bye bye Dick...and take Barack with you.


2 posted on 05/09/2012 6:53:45 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

They all develop this attitude after a couple of terms in the Senate. It’s a huge part of the whole problem.


3 posted on 05/09/2012 6:56:47 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
But that will require him to revise his stated goal of bringing more partisanship to Washington.
I saw Mourdock in a TV interview this morning and he said flat out - "I'm not compromising with anyone."
Right on, right on, right on.
5 posted on 05/09/2012 7:01:44 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

DO NOT be surprised if you find inside the beltway establishment republicans clandestinely funneling resources to Joe Donnelly! They absolutely HATE the TEA party and will do ANYTHING to defeat it!


8 posted on 05/09/2012 7:05:05 AM PDT by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
. . . I want him to be a good Senator. But that will require him to revise his stated goal of bringing more partisanship to Washington . . . his embrace of an unrelenting partisan mindset is irreconcilable with my philosophy of governance and my experience of what brings results for Hoosiers in the Senate. In effect, what he has promised in this campaign is reflexive votes for a rejectionist orthodoxy and rigid opposition to the actions and proposals of the other party . . .

This is the fundamental difference between Tea Party votes and major party votes. The Tea Party doesn't want to compromise on freedom or on responsible government just to bring "results for Hoosiers", not at the expense of results for the next generation of Americans. I am rigidly opposed to communism, to socialism, to big government liberalism, and to spending $1.5T more a year than the federal government brings in. I don't see any flaws at all in rigid opposition to Obama, Pelosi, and Reid, when their entire purpose in life is to subvert individual freedom.

I'm glad that Lugar is out; he was 100% wrong on compromise, which meant repeatedly splitting the difference between the current level of government intrusion and the level of government meddling in our wallets and in our lives desired by the far left. I hope the new Tea Party Senators and Congressmen will push for "compromise" in the sense of repeatedly splitting the difference between our current level of bloated government and a return to a limited and constitutional government. And I hope the far left will not default to reflexive votes for a rejectionist orthodoxy and rigid opposition to the actions and proposals of the patriotic Tea Party.

9 posted on 05/09/2012 7:05:11 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Can we afford as much government as welfare-addicted voters demand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Lugar needs to be taunted mercilessly.


10 posted on 05/09/2012 7:08:29 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Lugar is a TYPICAL RINO. If they can’t get nominated, they would rather a Democrat get in BECAUSE RINOs think more like Democrats than they tnink like fellow Republicans.


12 posted on 05/09/2012 7:14:34 AM PDT by ZULU (Non Nobis Domine Non Nobis Sed Nomini Tuo Da Gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
Lugar flipped the Tea Party off and they happily returned the favor. Buh-bye.
13 posted on 05/09/2012 7:17:19 AM PDT by JPG (A dyslexic man walks into a bra...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Is Lugar looking for support to pull a Murkowski? Sounds more like a campaign speech than a concession speech.


14 posted on 05/09/2012 7:18:01 AM PDT by BusterBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
There needs to be a blood test to determine how long a candidate can be in DC before they lose what soul they have.

Until then, term limits!

16 posted on 05/09/2012 7:19:15 AM PDT by GBA (Isaiah 9:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
...unrelenting partisan mindset...

Lugar's brain is adled by Washington DC-itus. Has he forgotten what the parasites did with their super-majority in 2009-2010? How Pelosi-Reid rolled Bush in 2007-2008? We need unrelenting conservative partisanship to unravel the mess created by the left.

19 posted on 05/09/2012 7:21:03 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

“...partisan mindset is irreconcilable with my philosophy of governance”

Right there is the meat of the matter....”go along, get along” politics has brought us to where we are....that ..and the fact that while Democrats ALWAYS play the partisan card...RINOS are too wimpy to do so...


21 posted on 05/09/2012 7:22:10 AM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Nonsense. Lugar was sufficiently gracious for my satisfaction. Damn it, we gave him a gold watch when he wanted to stay employed. I don’t expect him to be leading big cheers for the victor just yet.


22 posted on 05/09/2012 7:22:15 AM PDT by jimfree (In Nov 2012 my 11 y/o granddaughter will have more relevant executive experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Lugar, since 1977. Seems he is nothing but a government employee welfare queen. About time he was made to get a real job.


24 posted on 05/09/2012 7:22:49 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert; Interesting Times
A good friend of mine has a phrase describing sycophantic behavior:

"If you're above them in a hierarchy all you see is lips; if below, all you see is a**."

To which I would add the RINO corollary:

"To their left all they extend is cordial friendship; to the right vindictive hatred."

Regards,

TS

26 posted on 05/09/2012 7:23:16 AM PDT by The Shrew (www.wintersoldier.com; www.tstrs.com; The Truth Shall Set You Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
Time to start acting like team players, GOP-e...

Funny how that "team player" concept disappears whenever it isn't a central committee approved candidate who wins the primary. (C.f., Mookowski, Idiot-AK)

I'll make them a deal -- they come out in full force in support for the TEA Party candidates beat the "establishment" candidates in primaries, and I'll swallow my pride and vote for Romney in November. I can say this feeling pretty safe I'll never have to make good on my end of that deal.

28 posted on 05/09/2012 7:24:47 AM PDT by kevkrom (Those in a rush to trample the Constitution seem to forget that it is the source of their authority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert; caww; LucyT; All

” - - - In effect, what he has promised in this campaign is reflexive votes for a rejectionist orthodoxy and rigid opposition to the actions and proposals of the other party. His answer to the inevitable roadblocks he will encounter in Congress is merely to campaign for more Republicans who embrace the same partisan outlook. He has pledged his support to groups whose prime mission is to cleanse the Republican party of those who stray from orthodoxy as they see it.”

Yep. That pretty well describes why you lost this Primary election, Dicky L.

BTW Dicky L, did you become a Millionaire while in the US Senate?

If so, then I guess you found “Bipartisan Cave-In” to be a very profitable way of lining your sorry pockets at our expense.

BTW, BTW, to All: somebody clever an FR needs to take Dicky L’s pouty talking points and make some Campaign posters out of them!

POSTERS UP!!!!!!!!

Suggestions:

1.) “ - - - rigid opposition to the actions and proposals of the - - - “ ____________ ;

2.) “ - - - campaign for more Republicans who - - - “ __________ , ______________ , and ___________________________________________________ ;

3.) “ - - - prime mission is to cleanse the Republican party of those who stray from - - - “ ___________ , ______________ , and ___________________________________________________________________________ !


30 posted on 05/09/2012 7:29:57 AM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

It’s funny that the media doesn’t lament the loss of blue dog moderate dems to hyperpartisan socialists in the same manner./s


32 posted on 05/09/2012 7:30:59 AM PDT by archaicoldschool (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

I’d lay money he’s voting for Donnelly — if not writing himself in.


34 posted on 05/09/2012 7:34:04 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
Did it ever occur to Dick that the meaning of 'bipartisanship' has evolved to mean republicans doing it the democrats way? Does he have two eyes and a functioning brain?

Are these RINOs that dense, or are they that dishonest?

38 posted on 05/09/2012 7:40:35 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson