Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Obama's former doctor claims that the president lacks passion, feeling and humanity
Human Events ^ | 05/11/12 | Jarrett Stepman

Posted on 05/11/2012 10:45:41 AM PDT by DFG

In a revealing new book, The Amateur, author Edward Klein interviews President Barack Obama’s physician, Dr. David Scheiner, MD, who blasts the president’s health care plan and says that President Obama has an “academic detachment” that he could never break through.

The doctor fears that if the health care plan is “the failure” he believes it will be, because of runaway costs and other problems, then any health reform will be set back for years to come.

These are only a few of many reveals in Klein’s book, which makes the case that President Obama is not the political machine that people fear, but an amateur with a messianic complex who is completely out of his depth.

In an exclusive preview of The Amateur by Human Events, Obama’s longtime physician reveals the lack of humanity in Obama’s character and carelessness with which he enacted the entirely politicized health insurance reform, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, often called ObamaCare.

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012election; amateur; election2012; kenyanbornmuzzie; klein; mittromney; narcissism; narcissist; obama; obamadoctor; scheiner; sociopath; stepman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Cyber Liberty

He may consider it his duty, for whatever reason, to save us from impending doom.


21 posted on 05/11/2012 11:16:13 AM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
I hate to say this, but I think that even Obama is entitled to the privacy protections in the Doctor-Patient relationship.

I agree. And yes, it depends how this information got out. But people cannot confide in their doctors, priests, lawyers, etc., if they cannot trust that what they say will remain between them.

22 posted on 05/11/2012 11:18:17 AM PDT by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Symptom list for Psychopathy - Robert Hare

(Versons of this list are standard in psychology for psychopathic/anti-social personality disorder)

You don’t need ll of them to be a psychopath, but the more you have, the more likely you are.

Hare’s Checklist

1. GLIB and SUPERFICIAL CHARM — the tendency to be smooth, engaging, charming, slick, and verbally facile. Psychopathic charm is not in the least shy, self-conscious, or afraid to say anything. A psychopath never gets tongue-tied. They have freed themselves from the social conventions about taking turns in talking, for example..

2. GRANDIOSE SELF-WORTH — a grossly inflated view of one’s abilities and self-worth, self-assured, opinionated, cocky, a braggart. Psychopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior human beings.

3. NEED FOR STIMULATION or PRONENESS TO BOREDOM — an excessive need for novel, thrilling, and exciting stimulation; taking chances and doing things that are risky. Psychopaths often have a low self-discipline in carrying tasks through to completion because they get bored easily. They fail to work at the same job for any length of time, for example, or to finish tasks that they consider dull or routine.

4. PATHOLOGICAL LYING — can be moderate or high; in moderate form, they will be shrewd, crafty, cunning, sly, and clever; in extreme form, they will be deceptive, deceitful, underhanded, unscrupulous, manipulative, and dishonest.

5. CONNING AND MANIPULATIVENESS- the use of deceit and deception to cheat, con, or defraud others for personal gain; distinguished from Item #4 in the degree to which exploitation and callous ruthlessness is present, as reflected in a lack of concern for the feelings and suffering of one’s victims.

6. LACK OF REMORSE OR GUILT — a lack of feelings or concern for the losses, pain, and suffering of victims; a tendency to be unconcerned, dispassionate, coldhearted, and unempathic. This item is usually demonstrated by a disdain for one’s victims.

7. SHALLOW AFFECT — emotional poverty or a limited range or depth of feelings; interpersonal coldness in spite of signs of open gregariousness.

8. CALLOUSNESS and LACK OF EMPATHY — a lack of feelings toward people in general; cold, contemptuous, inconsiderate, and tactless.

9. PARASITIC LIFESTYLE — an intentional, manipulative, selfish, and exploitative financial dependence on others as reflected in a lack of motivation, low self-discipline, and inability to begin or complete responsibilities.

10. POOR BEHAVIORAL CONTROLS — expressions of irritability, annoyance, impatience, threats, aggression, and verbal abuse; inadequate control of anger and temper; acting hastily.

11. PROMISCUOUS SEXUAL BEHAVIOR — a variety of brief, superficial relations, numerous affairs, and an indiscriminate selection of sexual partners; the maintenance of several relationships at the same time; a history of attempts to sexually coerce others into sexual activity or taking great pride at discussing sexual exploits or conquests.

12. EARLY BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS — a variety of behaviors prior to age 13, including lying, theft, cheating, vandalism, bullying, sexual activity, fire-setting, glue-sniffing, alcohol use, and running away from home.

13. LACK OF REALISTIC, LONG-TERM GOALS — an inability or persistent failure to develop and execute long-term plans and goals; a nomadic existence, aimless, lacking direction in life.

14. IMPULSIVITY — the occurrence of behaviors that are unpremeditated and lack reflection or planning; inability to resist temptation, frustrations, and urges; a lack of deliberation without considering the consequences; foolhardy, rash, unpredictable, erratic, and reckless.

15. IRRESPONSIBILITY — repeated failure to fulfill or honor obligations and commitments; such as not paying bills, defaulting on loans, performing sloppy work, being absent or late to work, failing to honor contractual agreements.

16. FAILURE TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR OWN ACTIONS — a failure to accept responsibility for one’s actions reflected in low conscientiousness, an absence of dutifulness, antagonistic manipulation, denial of responsibility, and an effort to manipulate others through this denial.

17. MANY SHORT-TERM MARITAL RELATIONSHIPS — a lack of commitment to a long-term relationship reflected in inconsistent, undependable, and unreliable commitments in life, including marital.

18. JUVENILE DELINQUENCY — behavior problems between the ages of 13-18; mostly behaviors that are crimes or clearly involve aspects of antagonism, exploitation, aggression, manipulation, or a callous, ruthless tough-mindedness.

19. REVOCATION OF CONDITION RELEASE — a revocation of probation or other conditional release due to technical violations, such as carelessness, low deliberation, or failing to appear.

20. CRIMINAL VERSATILITY — a diversity of types of criminal offenses, regardless if the person has been arrested or convicted for them; taking great pride at getting away with crimes.


23 posted on 05/11/2012 11:19:08 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
Cyber,the doctor was only one of many persons interviewed by the author. Everyone,on either or both sides,need/s to be very careful about accurately representing the facts.

I notice that people are becoming much more aware of the difference between facts and opinions which in the long run is the only hope for this country and western civilization. An informed electorate,tethered to reality and truth is the only way for a society or country to survive.

24 posted on 05/11/2012 11:23:40 AM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

The most telling thing that narcissists do is contradict themselves. They will do this virtually in the same sentence. It can be trivial (e.g., about what they want for lunch) or it can be serious (e.g., about whether or not they love you). When you ask them which one they mean, they’ll deny ever saying the first one, though it may literally have been only seconds since they said it - really, how could you think they’d ever have said that? They will contradict FACTS. They will lie to you about things that you did together. They will misquote you to yourself. If you disagree with them, they’ll say you’re lying, making stuff up or are crazy. [At this point, if you’re like me, you sort of panic and want to talk to anyone who will listen about what is going on: this is a healthy reaction; it’s a reality check (”who’s the crazy one here?”)]. NOTE: Normal people can behave irrationally under emotional stress — be confused, deny things they know, get sort of paranoid, want to be babied when they’re in pain. But normal people recover pretty much within an hour or two or a day or two, and, with normal people, your expressions of love and concern for their welfare will be taken to heart. Not so with narcissists. If you’re like me, you get into disputes with narcissists over their casual dishonesty and cruelty to other people. Trying to reform narcissists by reasoning with them or by appealing to their better nature is about as effective as spitting the ocean. What you see is what you get: they have no better nature. The fundamental problem here is that narcissists lack empathy.


25 posted on 05/11/2012 11:25:43 AM PDT by choctaw man (Good ole Andrew Jackson, or You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
A personal opinion about the character of a patient does not violate confidentiality.

After all, he didn't confirm that he treated Obama for genital warts in his anus or Gonorrhea in his throat. OOPS...That was supposed to be confidential...

26 posted on 05/11/2012 11:26:55 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
To: DFG

The Won has plenty of passion - for destroying Western Civilization.

Now, now now. Don't you realize that you are attacking the WRONG person?

After all, Dear Leader's intentional agenda and policies over the past 3 1/2 years and his march towards the destruction of America and what he would ABSOLUTELY work toward if given another 4 years to complete his "mission," is.....WAIT FOR IT....nowhere near as bad as we cand expect, if we were to work towards his defeat, and .....GASP...vote to elect the (according to diogenesis and some other Freepers) most DANGEROUS person EVER to run for President.....Mitt Romney.

Yep, nodboutaboutit, lets all stay home or write in someone elses name (ON "PRINCIPLE") and then you know, in 4 years, we can really (I MEAN "REALLY") work to put a true "Conservative" in the Oval Office....

...Never mind we may not have a country left in 4 years.

Makes sense to me!!!! /major sarc

27 posted on 05/11/2012 11:28:11 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DFG
"Obama is not the political machine that people fear, but an amateur with a messianic complex who is completely out of his depth."

He's preaching to the choir, here. I think most Freepers recognized that about Obama from day one. That element of Obama's character is one of the primary things that makes him so dangerous.

He is completely divorced from the actual mechanics of our society and time-tested system of government, and does not have the ability to connect Cause to Effect.

28 posted on 05/11/2012 11:33:19 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

He’ll also get a visit from the IRS.


29 posted on 05/11/2012 11:35:50 AM PDT by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DFG

He’s just an empty suit


30 posted on 05/11/2012 11:38:24 AM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Hey Obama. How does it feel to have your personal medical information thrown around?


31 posted on 05/11/2012 11:38:56 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada
To: Dr. Sivana

I hate to say this, but I think that even Obama is entitled to the privacy protections in the Doctor-Patient relationship

I agree, as well as the "privacy protection" he has spent MILLIONS of $$$ to hide/embargo/destro/seal and locke up tighter than the Weeper of the House (Bone-er's) gonads are in a lock box somewhere, to include:

* His kindergarten records
* His Punahou school records
* His Occidental College records
* His Columbia University records
* His Columbia thesis
* His Harvard Law School records
* His Harvard Law Review articles
* His Scholarly articles from the University of Chicago
* His Passport
* His medical records
* His files from when he was an Illinois state senator
* His Illinois State Bar Association records
* And more.

As an aside do you think your or anyone else's in the country's medical records once they are made available to Sebelius and her thugs through mandate, will remain sacrosant?

Yeah right!!!

32 posted on 05/11/2012 11:39:53 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Too bad The One did not attend any lectures in economics at the U of Chicago, Milton Friedman’s home. Maybe the Econ profs would of knocked some sense into him.


33 posted on 05/11/2012 11:39:53 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
A personal opinion about the character of a patient does not violate confidentiality....

But would a statement on character be construed as a psychological profile? Wouldn't general practice overlap with psychiatry and psychology? You also have the "holistic" notions that have become fashionable in medicine-- extending obligation of physicians to such things as lifestyle and eating habits.

I think the guy was walking a fine line, and they'll probably retaliate. It costs them only other peoples money; they could bankrupt this guy with lawyers fees.

34 posted on 05/11/2012 11:46:26 AM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Too bad The One did not attend any lectures in economics at the U of Chicago, Milton Friedman’s home.

I did, but Dr. Friedman had already left for the sunny climes of California at Stanford. Actually the econ profs I had weren't up and down conservative, just more or less free market, but just on a practical level. I wouldn't trust many of them with my policy, and it would have only gotten worse. Now, Ingham and Hellie were great profs for Russian Civ (my required Non-Western civ class). Cynthia Kaplan was AWFUL for Soviet Domestic Policy (but denied tenure. Ha-ha). Interestingly, my best grade came from a visiting prof who had been a Carter operative.
35 posted on 05/11/2012 11:47:14 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet
Yep, nodboutaboutit, lets all stay home or write in someone elses name (ON "PRINCIPLE") and then you know, in 4 years, we can really (I MEAN "REALLY") work to put a true "Conservative" in the Oval Office.... ...Never mind we may not have a country left in 4 years.

Oh Gosh, the mitt-bots think they are so funny -- lol. It is still astounding to me that any Conservative can actually believe that Mitt would do anything to reduce the power of the State. Mitt's entire actual record is one of increasing the Power of the State over the Individual.

I will indeed do a write-in with a clear conscience.

The end-game with Mitt is exactly the end-game with Obama; they are both hard-core Socialists.

I have the greatest confidence that our Republic will rise up when the Statists of both parties are destroyed politically.

I have to smile at the anger of those who think Mitt would make a difference -- quite funny indeed.

36 posted on 05/11/2012 11:50:50 AM PDT by sand88 (Nothing on this Earth would get me to vote for Mitt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LibsRJerks
I would love to get a reading on McCain, who was our only other choice. Would he have come out much better? Maybe on the Antichrist thing.
37 posted on 05/11/2012 11:52:25 AM PDT by goosie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

How many of those symptoms determine the diagnosis? If half of them do, then most of us fit the mold.

I think of Psychopathy as a physical deficit— perhaps genetic or caused by drug abuse or physical trauma. Maybe mama obama dropped young barrack on his head.
I could be wrong about this.
I think ‘bams problems could be explained by his upbringing; he’s definitely damaged goods: a bastard, ignored by dad #1, probably mistreated by dad #2, raised by a sodden grand-dad, who palmed him off on surrogate dad Davis, who may have abused him. Mom wasn’t much help either. In short, a sad, angry case.


38 posted on 05/11/2012 11:54:35 AM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tsomer

Is the term “Narcissistic Sociopath” a redundancy?


39 posted on 05/11/2012 11:55:40 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
Like I said, Push comes to shove, a ‘copy’ of Obama’s real medical records could be leaked to the DC or the Washington Times.

I somehow believe that Obama must have something to hide based on the one page letter released from his present doctor purporting to his ‘good health’

A nice case of the Clap in the throat or in the sphincter would blow the happily married family man out of the water. Even black people, especially black women, HATE guys on the ‘down low’! He gets less than 95% of the black vote or lower minority participation he is toast

40 posted on 05/11/2012 12:03:00 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson