Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Private navy planned to counter pirate raids
The National ^ | May 13, 2012 | David Black

Posted on 05/16/2012 12:23:43 PM PDT by bkopto

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: bkopto

I am waitng for a pirate safari to be put together.


21 posted on 05/16/2012 1:02:53 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

“OTOH it will promote escort job security as the pirates aren’t eliminated. They will try again, requiring more escorts. “

It’s a business like any other. If you actually solved the problem, you’d be out of business. LOL


22 posted on 05/16/2012 1:04:25 PM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
I am curious what happens to the pirate captives? Will they be sent to Western countries to be assimilated into their societies?
23 posted on 05/16/2012 1:04:30 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“The Merchant Marine version of Blackwater.”

I half expected to see Eric Princes name in the article somewhere :)


24 posted on 05/16/2012 1:06:52 PM PDT by An American! (Proud To Be An American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

The USS Constitution was built mainly to deal with the Barbary Pirates, also Religion of peace pirates.


25 posted on 05/16/2012 1:10:04 PM PDT by mountainlion (I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Squantos; Eaker

That’s damn near 2 million a month in gross revenue. Not a bad business plan.


26 posted on 05/16/2012 1:11:38 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An American!
I half expected to see Eric Princes name in the article somewhere :)

And then we have this from Wikipedia (I know, Wikipedia sucks)

After Blackwater

In January 2011, the Associated Press reported that Prince had taken on a new role training a force of 2000 Somalis for anti-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden. The program is reportedly funded by several Arab countries, including the United Arab Emirates and backed by the United States. Prince's spokesman, Mark Corallo, said that Prince has "no financial role" in the project and declined to answer any questions about Prince's involvement. The Somali force will also reportedly pursue an Islamist supporting warlord.

The Associated Press quotes John Burnett of Maritime Underwater Security Consultants as saying "There are 34 nations with naval assets trying to stop piracy and it can only be stopped on land. With Prince's background and rather illustrious reputation, I think it's quite possible that it might work."[36]

27 posted on 05/16/2012 1:13:30 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Do I really need a sarcasm tag? Seriously? You're that dense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
“I’d rather have the Russian Navy patrolling the waters. After all, sharks gotta eat, too.”
___

Exactly right. Or a portable R2D2 mounted above the bridge, take it off of a ship going one direction and put it on one going the other direction. Package deal complete with operators, make approaching a commercial vessel so dangerous that no one would attempt it, and buy enough of them to cover all the ships in transit.

28 posted on 05/16/2012 1:15:15 PM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Did someone say "escort"?

29 posted on 05/16/2012 1:20:27 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
It ain’t an either-or,

The article stated the economics working as a replacement cost.

The CEP will buy insurance and use that to cover the ships in its convoys, so owners will no longer need to pay premiums, or hire security.

Instead, they will just pay a flat $30,000 to $40,000 per ship in the convoy.

30 posted on 05/16/2012 1:21:02 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

” I am curious what happens to the pirate captives? Will they be sent to Western countries to be assimilated into their societies? “

The Somalis we brought here have started crime waves everywhere we dropped them.


31 posted on 05/16/2012 1:21:31 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Sounds like a long term revenue generation protection racket, rather than a pirate elimination service, to me. It keeps pirates at a distance, alive armed and ready, as long as you pay.


32 posted on 05/16/2012 1:31:50 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it and the law is what WE say it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney; HiTech RedNeck
The article could have been more clearly written, however I believe what they meant was that the ship owners wouldn't have to pay the "additional premiums" for piracy coverage. That meaning is plain enough (to me), in the context of the whole article.
33 posted on 05/16/2012 1:44:38 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

wners wouldn’t have to pay the “additional premiums” for piracy coverage

I read it the same. Sorry I wasn’t clear.


34 posted on 05/16/2012 1:49:12 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

I’d shiver her timbers.


35 posted on 05/16/2012 1:50:24 PM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA; thackney

Especially consider that it’s being RUN in part by the noted ship and specialty insurance firm Lloyds of London. (The one that rings the Lutine Bell when the loss of a ship is reported.) Sounds a lot like Lloyds will offer the option of piracy coverage WITH a contract to this navy, for cheaper than piracy coverage without it.


36 posted on 05/16/2012 2:03:54 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Mitt! You're going to have to try harder than that to be "severely conservative" my friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

yo ho ho and a yeehaw


37 posted on 05/16/2012 2:04:36 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Mitt! You're going to have to try harder than that to be "severely conservative" my friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I guess we will have to disagree.

I read “The CEP will buy insurance and use that to cover the ships in its convoys, so owners will no longer need to pay premiums”.

to mean no longer paying piracy premiums, not a discounted piracy premium. It is included in their fee.

Cheers (and a bottle of rum, yo ho...)


38 posted on 05/16/2012 2:08:27 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

AAARRRGGG,,, She’s a fine looking wench . . .


39 posted on 05/16/2012 2:17:44 PM PDT by ßuddaßudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Well the idea that CEP is buying insurance for its navylet sounds even weirder. And it wouldn’t have anything to do with insurance for the shippers contracting their help... or would it? Anyhow, if backed by Lloyds isn’t that redundant? Perhaps some words got misplaced here.

Sounds like a package deal. You hire the Mini Navy and you also get coverage for cases where even it failed to halt pirates. But we’ll have to wait to see the details spelled out in a formal offer. Surely it will show up on the Lloyds website...?


40 posted on 05/16/2012 3:42:50 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Mitt! You're going to have to try harder than that to be "severely conservative" my friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson