At first i thought it was a joke, but it is not. why? God only knows.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: beebuster2000
2 posted on
05/28/2012 4:37:58 PM PDT by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: beebuster2000
Actually, wouldn’t that solve the fraternization issues? Women are intellectually capable of handling a nuclear sub. (Well, not me, math was never my strong point! But SOME women can handle it. ;o)
I think this may be an experiment worth trying.
3 posted on
05/28/2012 4:38:27 PM PDT by
Hetty_Fauxvert
( "Be Breitbart, baby!")
To: beebuster2000
New twist on going down....
New subs don’t have to raise the periscope either...
5 posted on
05/28/2012 4:39:51 PM PDT by
y6162
To: beebuster2000
How can 24 women run a fast attack sub?
Also none of them hold rank over LT.
6 posted on
05/28/2012 4:40:30 PM PDT by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: beebuster2000
“Coming up on tonight’s 10 O’clock News, military leaders in Moscow are on high alert due to intelligence reports indicating it’s ‘that time of the month’ aboard the American Navy submarine Illinois. ...”
7 posted on
05/28/2012 4:40:55 PM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(My tagline is in the shop.)
To: beebuster2000
8 posted on
05/28/2012 4:41:00 PM PDT by
Lexington Green
(''Those who bite the hand that feeds them will lick the boots that kick them.'' -- Eric Hoffer)
To: beebuster2000
Obviously, an all-female submarine crew is a deliberate political act, the purpose of which is absolutely superfluous serving no military purpose except as a function of nefarious political correctness.
9 posted on
05/28/2012 4:41:10 PM PDT by
lbryce
(OMG. What have we done to deserve the likes of the miscreant Zero?)
To: beebuster2000
Women’s menstrual cycles tend to synchronize in much less enclosed environments than a submarine. I wonder if PMS will be a problem.
To: beebuster2000
From the reader comments:
“Am I the only one who sees the irony of the first black,
First Lady launching the first segregated military unit in this century?”
12 posted on
05/28/2012 4:42:36 PM PDT by
Palmetto Patriot
(How much better off would we be if these bastards would just leave us alone?)
To: beebuster2000
15 posted on
05/28/2012 4:42:56 PM PDT by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: beebuster2000
“Michelle Obama officially sponsored”
I didn’t know yetis could sponsor a ship.
20 posted on
05/28/2012 4:44:47 PM PDT by
wxgesr
(I want to be the first person to surf on another planet.)
To: beebuster2000
While the issue of can they or can they not safely and
effectively crew and operate a submarine is a reasonable
issue to discuss their is one more issue that is far more
critical. Can they be trusted to launch if such an order
was given or if other circumstances required that they do
so. The psychological differences between women would make
such one wonder if women have what it takes to perform an
action that they know could kill millions.
To: beebuster2000
Naval version of Rush’s “All Amazon Battalion”.
22 posted on
05/28/2012 4:45:43 PM PDT by
TurboZamboni
(Looting the future to bribe the present)
To: beebuster2000
25 posted on
05/28/2012 4:48:44 PM PDT by
Delta 21
(Oh Crap !! Did I say that out loud ??!??)
To: beebuster2000
Martha Stewart has had some excellent experience doing interior decorating in very small spaces. Think they’ll hire her to do the decorating on their sub?
26 posted on
05/28/2012 4:48:58 PM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: beebuster2000
Men and women serving together on combat surface ships has decreased their (all the usual PC issues of frivolous but taken seriously accusations of racism sexism oh and homophobia now too I suppose, so the “victims” can do what they want) effectiveness but not so bad that the vessels are total basket cases.
Different on a sub—if you ain't got efficiency and harmony on the boats you got dead sailors.
So all male or all female crews make sense and I wish the ladies well.
27 posted on
05/28/2012 4:49:58 PM PDT by
Happy Rain
("If an Evil be politically correct--none dare call it Evil.")
To: beebuster2000
This just figures they name a submarine after a state that is under water.
30 posted on
05/28/2012 4:52:38 PM PDT by
twoputt
To: beebuster2000
OMG what is next with these liberals...The Gay Sub christened by ODumbo. sheesh
To: beebuster2000
34 posted on
05/28/2012 4:55:19 PM PDT by
Happy Rain
("If an Evil be politically correct--none dare call it Evil.")
To: beebuster2000; John Semmens
This will put John Semmens out of business.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
