http://youtu.be/P5p70YbRiPw
FYI: Holder has also been fighting states trying to purge voter rolls of felons and the dead.(as required be the Voting Rights Act)
What about absentee vote fraud, hmmm?
But the Obama administration is all about Change, so ... just stand by: they've got a plan.
Everyone knows holder is a partisan hack. By refusing to allow voter ID laws they are promoting and encouraging voter fraud. How much? Not sure. Holder doesn’t want us to know how much.
Holder only knows what the voices in his head tell him
Yeah right Holder. That’s why John Connally wrote about LBJ pushing him to register dead voters in South Texas.
Holder is the congenital liar who can’t tell the truth.
Personally Eric, I think any moron who doesn’t vote “in person” really doesn’t need to vote. If they can’t get off of their lazy asses to go vote, what will get them off of their asses? Moochelle needs to add getting off your ass and going to the polls to vote part of her exercise program for America.
The ‘Rats own get-out-the-vote propaganda says one vote can change an election. If that’s true then any fraud at all is too much.
And everyone knows that Holder is obstructing justice.
We’ll see...
When no ID is required HOW IN THE HELL can anyone know?
The Alinsky playbook is getting pretty thin.
If no effort is expended to detect voting fraud, the the logic follows that the statistics will show the detection of it is rare. AG Holder, this is a form of the Correlation Fallacy and is taught in basic logic class. Did you miss class that day / week? Did you take logic? If 2 men in semi-uniforms stand in front of a polling place door, are they only metaphysical because they resemble Obama’s nonexistent son?
Murder’s uncommon too. Should we tolerate it?
Also, let’s follow another line of attack. Say we stipulate that it is uncommon. Now, consider that maybe 95% of elections are not close races (with a few percentage points). In the 5% of the races that are close, let’s say an average of half of those are in districts where Dems don’t dominate the polling places, so the fraud is not allowed. We’ve got 2.5% of the races, with under a 3% difference, where fraud is likely to occur. All it takes to tip those races is a small percentage of the total votes. So, all you need is a few percent of the votes in a few percent of the races (multiplying fractions results in a smaller fraction of course), and you can tip the balance of power in states and even the whole country. Vote fraud applied strategically in the right circumstances, therefore, is still a serious risk to the democratic process, even if it is quite rare.
Once tens of thousands of fraudulent voters are registered by ACORN, et al, then none of those individuals commits “in person” fraud when he or she turns up to vote on the basis of the fraudulent registration. Voter ID stops that by requiring a state issued ID that will only be issued once, like a driver’s license, with no individual being to get more than one. Then the local officials be able to allow valid voters, in their districts, to register and vote.
“those on all sides of this debate have acknowledged that in-person voting fraud is uncommon.
Sure—like everyone knows that the private sector is doing fine. Where are these humanoids living?
The left are dishonest and cheat. The fight they are putting up proves it, otherwise there is nothing to lose in going along.
Holder on the wrong side of a debate.
Again.
Between supplying firearms to Mexican drug cartels and arguing for electoral corruption, it’s surprising he has any time for his job.
Or does he?