Skip to comments.Was communist mentor intimate with Obama's mother?
Posted on 06/14/2012 10:01:13 PM PDT by Perseverando
Filmmaker reveals new evidence Frank Marshall Davis was president's real father
NEW YORK Did Barack Obamas mother pose nude for communist poet and journalist Frank Marshall Davis?
Did Obama build his political career on a fairy tale that his father was a Kenyan who grew up herding goats?
Was Obamas goal in writing his autobiography, Dreams from My Father, to misdirect Americans away from a deeply disturbing family background and a Marxist political foundation?
These are questions filmmaker Joel Gilbert poses in the full-length documentary Dreams from My Real Father, which argues Frank Marshall Davis is the presidents biological father, not the Kenyan Barack Obama.
Gilbert reports he has recently discovered racy photos in vintage fetish and bondage magazines of Obamas mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, that he believes were taken by Davis. The photos, he says, bolster his belief that Dunham had an intimate relationship with Davis.
Joel Gilberts Dreams from My Real Father is on sale now at WNDs Superstore
Gilbert has given WND a preview of a new Breaking News page on his documentarys website titled The Intimate Ann Dunham-Frank Marshall Davis Relationship. On the page, he presents a video that shows some of the 30-plus pin-up photographs he believes Davis took of Obamas young mother and other models in his home at 2994 Kalihi Street in Honolulu, Hawaii.
Frank Marshall Davis, pornographer
In 1968, Greenleaf Classics in San Diego published a pornographic novel titled Sex Rebel Black: Memoirs of a Gash Gourmet, authored by Bob Greene, a pen name Davis later admitted was his own.
In the sex novel that Davis claimed was autobiographical, he describes a swinging lifestyle in which he and his wife had sex numerous times with an underage girl named Anne, a figure very suggestive of Obamas mother.
As Gilbert documents, ....
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
This is a statement for which you have no evidence, merely baseless assertions. Heck, as documented above, you apparently haven't even read the article.
ok, you’ve convinced me, you qualify for the blind-as-a-bat award or the wilfully stupid - maybe both. Either way I’m losing interest. You bore me.
You have an interesting posting history. The second page of your comments takes one to January 2011. And perusal of a few pp shows you were beating the FMD is the father drum even then, and just as nasty and arrogant as you are now.
You have an agenda, and it is to obfuscate and create a meme that FMD is the father. You know the reason, and others can guess pretty easily.
I never said Obama resembles Frank Marshall Davis. In fact, I said he doesn't look like him at all. As for Obama resembling Stanley Ann's father, he does if you compare typical pictures of Obama. Not like those you posted with unusual facial expressions.
I personally don’t give a rat’s you-know-what who the commie SOB’s father was.
Yes, and anyone with half a brain who was paying attention had figured out that Frank was Barry’s dreaming father back in 2008. What’s your point?
I’m like you, I really don’t give a hoot who his father was, and please don’t think my comments are always directed entirely or solely at you, what I am trying to make clear is, if there are going to be comparisons, they should be made with a large number of images chosen at random.
And that’s what I did. I chose a number of images of zero at random to place in line with the only images of Stanley Armour Dunham that are not of him as an old man.
The performer formerly known as Barry Soetero is certainly not a son of Frank Marshall Davis, although he was mentored by the avowed Communist and sexual deviate from ages nine through eighteen.
The woman in the sepia cheesecake is not Stanley Ann Dunham just from the nose--SAD's could crack nuts; Sepia Cheese's is a Bob Hope ski slope.
Neither does Boy King resemble alleged father Hussein I.
The winner of the resemblance award thus far is Malcolm Little, but DNA or other proofs are lacking.
Our 44th president continues to present as described by Holmes to Watson in The Adventure of the Three Garridebs, "Touch him where we will he is false."
As Charles Laughton berates Marlene Dietrich in Witness for the Prosecution, "Are you lying now, were you lying then or are you not a chronic and habitual liar!"
At least he had a girlfriend--see how swollen she makes his head.
"The good, the bad, and the ugly."
Yep. I read from #201 to the (current) end of the thread. Lots of good (and some fairly vicious) back-and-forth. For those interested, there is another related thread that had some interesting points also.
I need to clarify something...when I wrote that I selected images of zero at random, I meant that I chose as many black and white images as I could find, that showed him of an age as close as possible to Stanley Armour Dunham.
The second time I went out to California to attend Mohammad Hassan Chandoos graduation from Occidental College, Obama was enjoying the lavish lifestyle being financed by his friend and roommate at the time - Hassan Chandoo. The wealthy patron provided Obama access to big houses, lavish parties & had him dressed in the slickest clothes. I could have sworn they were both Gay & wealthy.
Those were some of the initial observations by Dr. John C. Drew, PhD, on his second encounter with Barack Obama who was attending Occidental College at the time. ..."
Understood, and absolutely agree that a comparison shouldn't be made based on one photo. That's what some people here tried to do with Obama and Malcom X. Then again, there are some folks who look like entirely different people in different photographs. Some people look very different from different angles and/or lighting conditions. Others not so different. It depends on the type of face one has.
Who said anything about looking "exactly the same"??
And youll be none the wiser who he is, when and where he was born, and what his real name is.
And how is that any different from now, trying to claim that two different women are one and the same??
Have you bothered to read the article yet, or are your rude, nasty pointless spam comments still coming from a point of unadulterated 100% pure ignorance?
Hmmm, LJ has been involved with these natality issues since before 2008 explosion, and done solid research on the issues ... you’ve been trying to push one excuse after another to cover for the liar-in-chief ... nope, can’t ignore your obvious bias and insults when cornered. Be gone, obamanoid. Peddle FMD on some other forum where real research is not done and you can lead people around by their emotion with your pondscum.
With comments like yours, you’re hereby renamed CLUMMZ.
Hmmm, LJ has been involved with these natality issues since before 2008 explosion, and done solid research on the issues ... youve been trying to push one excuse after another to cover for the liar-in-chief ... nope, cant ignore your obvious bias and insults when cornered. Be gone, obamanoid. Peddle FMD on some other forum where real research is not done and you can lead people around by their emotion with your pondscum.
Regarding Davis, again, mentor, not father.
And Obama's sexuality is a fair arc from Davis' knee to Reggie Loverboy, with the beard, the low-down lounge, and Larry Sinclair in between.
Did I mention how much I lu-uv his whistling esses.
Hey, not that there's anything wrong with that.
I am doing nothing of the kind, I am simply showing that the model is always the same model, she had a long career, she got a little older, she changed her make-up, used a little more and darker lipstick, gained some weight, but she was the same girl, and I don't need to focus on what her name might have been, to know there was ONE MODEL, and that model wasn't Stanley Ann Dunham.
The eyes are without question, identical.
Who was it RE-ARRANGED Stanley Ann's face? Who changed the nose, the position of her eyes, the distance between her top lip and bottom of her nose...the eyebrows, the hair; there can only be one reason why anyone would want to believe this is the same girl in both images, and that's to confer natural-bborn citizenship upon zero, and try to show that he must have been born in Hawaii.
It's got to be a last-ditch attempt - and for that, a seventeen year old girl who was in high school somewhere in 1960 (we don't really know where yet) has to be labelled a slut and placed in bed with Frank Marshall Davis, although we have seen no physical evidence of her in Hawaii until 1963.
There are many more images of the ONE AND ONLY MODEL in this Gilbert video, SHE NEVER DID LOOK ANYTHING LIKE STANLEY ANN DUNHAM:
Sorry, but this is extremely weak to use photos from two different sides of a person’s face to try to make it look like it’s not the same person. And beside, these images have a similar open-mouthed expression and overbite. These isn’t helping whatever your argument is.
THE IMAGES BELOW ARE THE MODEL
You will find more images of THE MODEL in the video on this site:
I’m not going to the video, but it appears to me that there are two different women pictured in the lower “model” grouping. Neither appears to be Stanley Ann Dunham. Imho.
I don’t have an argument, I have a pair of eyes, I knew from when I first traced the images of the model to the free-vintage-porn.com website years ago - that the girl pictured, to whom I refer as ‘the model’, was nothing like Stanley Ann Dunham. And it’s rather telling isn’t it, that the entire website has been scrubbed of images since the Gilbert film was produced.
Believe what you like, I can’t force you to see what you don’t want to see. The model isn’t Stanley Ann Dunham and you need to ask yourself, who does it serve to have you believe it does?
And why the promotion of the falacy just now, when those images have been all over the web for YEARS?
Is their house of lies starting to fall down, and ANY ‘father’ will do, as long as it’s someone who was in Hawaii?
Remember, I’m an Aussie, I’m neither a Dem nor a Rep, I’m not a voter, I’m just an observer and I hate seeing your country hoodwinked.
And that's the whole point. She's a model who had a long career and her image is all over the video, from which there's nothing to fear, it just shows a series of photographs of THE MODEL - images that Gilbert uses in his film to try and convince his audience that THE MODEL is someone whom SHE IS NOT. The video appears on THE BIRTHER REPORT website:
you've got to be suffering from conditioning like Pavlov's dogs, to write that, what I posted are two profiles, the only profile shots I could find of 1. STANLEY ANN DUNHAM. 2. THE MODEL.
Get it? Profile images of two different women, whose NOSES are in a diferent place for starters...not to mention all the other obvious differences.
I'm glad you're not identifying people in a police line-up, you would have one of them convicted for nothing more than a superficial resemblance.
You are transparent, a fool, and a liar. And sounding pretty desperate.
You had an absence from FR of over a year very recently, and jumped in with two feet with no explanation of you absence (not that it’s mandatory, but most freepers mention something about long absences) and yet again, as you were before, drumming the nonsensical and evidence-free lie that FMD was Zero’s father and that SAD was a porn star.
You’re either stark raving mad or duplicitous and are pushing this junk for specifica purposes. The most obvious reason would be to push Zero as a NBC.
Nonsense. You're blinded by your own sense of self-importance on trying to establish yourself as some sort of ace debunker. It's not serving you well in the least.
I disagree. This is a result of looking too hard to try to find a difference that just isn’t there.
You don’t like the message and you’re blaming the messenger.
Stanley Ann Dunham did NOT have a sexual relationship with a black man 35 years older than her. YOU DON’T KNOW WHO THE MOTHER OF ZERO IS AND IT BOTHERS YOU.
Nonsense. All I’m doing is comparing pictures that have been posted. This has nothing to do with the deflections you’re bringing up.
SHOW ME. SHOW ME a ‘deflection’.
Show me with IMAGES. Don’t refer back to something I posted with nothing but WORDS which is what is confusing to others reading this thread.
SHOW ME THE IMAGE - and when you SHOW ME, then tell me what it is that you disagree with. It’s far too easy to write and say ‘those two images are the same’ when there’s NOTHING ON THE COMMENT. Without the image itself, JUST WHO IS GUILTY OF DEFLECTION?
This is quite a meltdown. I haven’t said the images are the same. The deflection was this: “Stanley Ann Dunham did NOT have a sexual relationship with a black man 35 years older than her. YOU DONT KNOW WHO THE MOTHER OF ZERO IS AND IT BOTHERS YOU.” YOUR images show a woman with several features that are similar. This notion that it can’t be the same woman is nonsense.
Your offtopic stalking is exposing you as a desperate fool. You shuodl read and discuss the article this thread is dedicated instead of spamming it with offtopic ad hominem.
The article provides tons of evidence that Stanley Anne Dunham was naked and creating amateur porn 8 months before Zero's birth.
Why don't you address the copious evidence in the topic article instead of spreading leftist snopes disinformation and ad hominem?
As of now, your behavior is your admission of your ignorance -- unless of course it is indicative of something more diabolical.
* The article provides tons of evidence that Stanley Anne Dunham was naked and creating amateur porn with Frank Marshall Davis 8 months before Zero’s birth.
It’s not a matter of a notion I have, it’s simply a matter of it NOT being the same woman that I have shown in profiles.
The young woman on the left is Stanley Ann Dunham, the woman on the right is THE MODEL and they are not the same person.
And why won’t you post the image with your argument? Show me. I want to see your identification of them both UNDERNEATH OR ABOVE THE IMAGE COMPOSITION.NOT JUST WORDS.
Post the image, identify them, and let the readers make up own minds ACCORDING TO WHAT THEY CAN SEE.
thanks Phil, I’m about to make another composite using a couple of images some kind Freeper sent me. I’ll ping you.
There’s not much more I can do but try to show them, THE MODEL isn’t Stanley Ann Dunham, but it seems images don’t make any difference, those who want to believe Stanley Ann went to bed with Frank Marshall Davis and produced zero, will cling to it for ever, evidence to the contrary regardless.
"They tell you a beautiful story--it isn't the truth, but it is beautiful nonetheless."
Once upon a time there was a little high school girl aged seventeen from Kansas, and she was seduced by an old coloured man in Hawaii, a communist journalist who took erotic photographs of her, which he sold to porno websites and magazines, and when she became pregnant to him, they packed her off to Kenya to have the baby and lied and said that a foreign student from the village of Kogelo was the father, all to protect the old pervert journalist and her Bank Vice President mother. And they named the boy after the kenyan, who went to Harvard and didn't know about it all until he received divorce papers in 1964, on which he discovered that some child had been named after him...and now that little boy is President of the United States of America.
How is that for a beautiful story that isn't true?
Well, it looks like Miss Model has light colored eyes (which was pointed out on another thread some days ago) and SAD’s are brown. Miss Model has a mole on her cheek (darkened in one shot, but left natural in the other) and SAD does not. Miss Model isn’t Marcy Moore either because Marcy Moore has a mole on the opposite cheek from Miss Model. Also, Marcy Moore has moles and/or large freckles scattered across her chest in other poses, but those don’t show up on Miss Model’s full photos. I think we’re dealing with three different people here.
Thanks for posting these pics, Fred.
Sorry, but there's simply no way to make such a determination on the basis of these two photos. It's one thing to disagree, but there's nothing definitive from what has been presented.
Many features indicate we are looking at two different women.
With mouth closed the placement of the lips/mouth between the nose and chin is dramatically different. At the left, proportional; in the center, mouth drawn to the nose foreshortening the upper lip, presenting a long and pointed chin.
Leading to the overall shape difference: at the left proportional; at the center, quite elongated: thin and tall.
The nostrils at the center noticeably asymmetrical; in both right and left, symmetrical.
The ears on right and left tilt in at the bottom; in the center, pendulous--reflecting the father, Stanley Armour Dunham.
One is a model; the other, a future bank officer.
Bingo ... but these folks aren’t playing, they’re seriously trying to establish the newest fake scenario of the pix equal Stanley thus FMD is the likely bio donor. But the essence of the exercise is that the Kenayan bigamist is the legal father of record thus little barry bastard commie is not an NBC.
Apparently someone found the vintage porn site with a model who bears resemblance to SAD and ran with it, for an obvious agenda.