Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The End Justifies the Means (DREAM Act through executive fiat)
National Review Online ^ | June 15, 2012 | Mark Krikorian

Posted on 06/15/2012 5:00:30 PM PDT by neverdem

The White House decision to enact the DREAM Act through executive fiat is a lawless act. This isn’t even about immigration; it’s about the Constitution. I have repeatedly written that something like DREAM has much to recommend it, though it would need to be very different from the current iteration, which has been voted down in Congress several times. I understand that Senator Marco Rubio has finally put together a final version of his alternative bill and that Senators Kyl and Hutchison have signed on — from my discussions with his staff, I probably won’t like what he’s come up with, but unless there are typos in my version of Article I of the Constitution, that’s the way lawmaking is supposed work. For all the administration’s pious denials that this measure “confers no substantive right” and “only the Congress, acting through its legislative authority, can confer these rights”, they’re lying. The illegal immigrants in question will receive two-year renewable permits to live legally in the United States and an Employment Authorization Document — that, in plain terms, is what we call “amnesty”.

Any DREAM Act supporter who applauds this measure has forfeited any right to complain about future usurpation of the Constitution. Even backers of DREAM in Congress have a responsibility to deny funding to DHS to carry out this policy.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dreamact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: doc1019

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) announced Friday that he plans to sue the president for issuing an executive order blocking deportations of illegal aliens.

In 1999 he successfully sued then-Gov. Tom Vilsack over an executive order.

Rep King won.

Back then all the “experts” said he would lose as well.

Too bad for the “experts.”

.


21 posted on 06/15/2012 7:07:53 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter

This is a 180 for Baxter, he used to be against the illegals a few years ago.


22 posted on 06/15/2012 7:33:13 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: altura
O'Reilly sometimes has some interesting guests on. That's the main reason to watch him. O'Reilly himself--a small dose goes a long way.

O'Reilly has always been very friendly to Trayvon's parents' lawyer and very unsympathetic to Zimmerman. Sean Hannity initially was wiling to be fair and even had some pro-Zimmerman guests on, but then he shut up. I wonder if the Fox head honchos laid down the law--no coverage that might cause people to think Zimmerman is innocent.

23 posted on 06/15/2012 7:51:18 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gabrial

O’Reilly has at least one daughter. And a wife.

He lives on Long Island and hangs with ‘Liberals.’

Ain’t no conservative bone sitting there in handmade suits.


24 posted on 06/15/2012 8:04:06 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

With the stroke of a pen his Ineptedness created another underclass of people.


25 posted on 06/15/2012 9:13:33 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Ineptocracy; the Obama way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The illegal immigrants in question will receive two-year renewable permits to live legally in the United States and an Employment Authorization Document — that, in plain terms, is what we call “amnesty”.

Isn't this like having a temporary work/education visa (not a green card)? I wouldn't think they could get government goodies.

26 posted on 06/15/2012 9:51:33 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Ineptocracy; the Obama way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1

“kagan leaked the supremes decision on SB #1070 due out monday, that is why the commie went around the rose bush today.”

I think so... why else would he make it effective IMMEDIATELY.


27 posted on 06/15/2012 11:54:50 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It’s rather scary to see an American(?)president bypass the legislature and make his own rules.

Would the scu*bags who voted for him now have us call him
“your excellency”, “your highness” or maybe “your brilliance”?

Or maybe they will demand that we say “heil” as a greeting in the new, enlightened dictatorship which is now pushing its nose under the tent flap.

IMHO


28 posted on 06/16/2012 4:00:08 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
It’s good to be the king.

King? Kings are losers. Shoot for Imperious Maximum Osagyefo Dear Leader and God Emperor of the Worthless White Foot-on-the-Neck Scum-People of the United States of America. That will impress your buddies in the U.N.

29 posted on 06/16/2012 4:10:00 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson