Not really it takes one of these to do that.
Posted on 07/05/2012 5:46:45 AM PDT by pabianice
The only impediment to One World Government(OWG)is the US Constitution. The only impediment IN the US Constitution is the 2nd Amendment.
OWG is the goal. All the craziness we see now is orchestrated to that end. Be prepared for the finale.
Of course there aren't. But just to underscore your point, 45 Republican Senators< and 13 Democrat Senators are already on the public record in opposition. Here are their names:
| Lamar Alexander (R-TN) Kelly Ayotte(R-NH) John Barrasso (R-WY) Roy Blunt (R-MO) John Boozman (R-AR) Scott Brown (R-MA) Richard Burr (R-NC) Dan Coats (R-IN) Tom Coburn (R-OK) Thad Cochran (R-MS) Susan Collins (R-ME) Bob Corker (R-TN) John Cornyn (R-TX) Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) Mike Crapo (R-ID) Jim DeMint (R-SC) |
Mike Enzi (R-WY) Lindsey Graham (R-SC) Chuck Grassley (R-IA) Orrin Hatch (R-UT) Dean Heller (R-NV) John Hoeven (R-ND) Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) James Inhofe (R-OK) Johnny Isakson (R-GA) Mike Johanns (R-NE) Ron Johnson (R-WI) Jon Kyl (R-AZ) Mike Lee (R-UT) John McCain (R-AZ) Mitch McConnell (R-KY) |
Jerry Moran (R-KS) Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) Rand Paul (R-KY) Rob Portman (R-OH) Jim Risch (R-ID) Pat Roberts (R-KS) Marco Rubio (R-FL) Jeff Sessions (R-AL) Richard Shelby (R-AL) Olympia Snowe (R-ME) John Thune (R-SD) Pat Toomey (R-PA) David Vitter (R-LA) Roger Wicker (R-MS) |
Max Baucus (D-MT) Mark Begich (D-AK) Bob Casey, Jr. (D-PA) Joe Manchin (D-WV) Claire McCaskill (D-MO) Ben Nelson (D-NE) Mark Pryor (D-AR) Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) Jon Tester (D-MT) Mark Udall (D-CO) Tom Udall (D-NM) Mark Warner (D-VA) Jim Webb (D-VA) |
They’re going to “ram” something through 67 votes? I doubt it. Even if the duck is lame.
Big woop. What can be agreed to by one Senate can be withdrawn from by another, assuming this years crop of Pubbies has two stones apiece to call on. How long would the treaty be in effect, 30 days? Plus, I think it takes a super-super-majority in the Senate to adopt a treaty anyway, like 66 votes or something like that. Course Harry the Asshat will just claim he can ratify treaties in reconciliation with 51 votes. No matter -- if you can ratify in reconciliation you can un-ratify in reconciliation.
Consider the plausibility of this scenario:
Congress passes a bill relating to weapons, such as:
outlawing ownership of more than a hundred assault weapons, or banning private ownnership of shoulder-held rocket launchers. Or some such thing that RINOs will be afraid to vote against in an election year. Someone (possibly a plant) contests this to the Supreme Court.
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, decides that the 2nd amendment means ‘the people (i.e. the government)’ has the right to bear arms, but NOT INDIVIDUALS.
Gun ownership would be immediately banned, without Congress having any say in the matter.
We now have precedence that this is how our system works. THIS PRECEDENT CANNOT STAND!
Roberts has become the Judge, Jury, and Executioner of our country.
And we have enabled it by not immediately initiating impeachment.
Are we so naiive as to think the other shoe is not about to drop, presumably soon after Roberts emerges from hiding? Are we just going to continue to allow our rights, liberty and freedom to be usurped?
He's actually correct once a decade. He's already used up the current one.
I think it's a common misreading that causes confusion around this issue. The phrase you highlighted above is often misread as "the Constitution, or laws of any state", with the comma greatly changing the meaning, which could be restated as "the constitution of any state, or laws of any state".
Of course, for people who can't even understand a simple declarative of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed", it's easy to see how they could make that mistake.
None of this matters. The Senate has to have a two-thirds vote in favor to ratify a treaty. The last time I looked, the RATs are no where near that number, thanks to the voters in 2010! It will be interesting to see who on the RAT side actually votes for this nonsense. I’ll bet dinner that the RATs who are standing for re-election (23 I believe) will run from it unless they are in a deep blue district. But let’s hope that they take the bait from FUBO and do vote for it, because it will just be more nails in their electoral coffins. Come on Claire, vote for it!
>>Now, that depends on John Roberts’ emotional necessity to be praised by MSM and Eminent Professors, doesn’t it?<<
Don’t remind me - my stomach is still turning.
I’m curious....has Dick Morris EVER been right about ANYTHING? He always makes bold predictions and very few of them ever work out like he says they will.
They have not thought this out all the way, cops are not soldiers, they will not take the number of KIA needed to take all guns away from the hard-cores. Most SWAT team are a very small percentage of officers and they can only mount an operation once or twice a day with all of the planning involved. Plus, they very rarely lose any team members as no shots are normally fired in most raids and most of the shots that are fired at them are from pistols rather than rifles that can go thru body armor.
U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2: [The President] ...”shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;”
The operative word here is “present.” The Vice President, as President of the Senate, can and probably will call a special session of the Senate consisting of himself, Chucky Shumer, Diane Feinstein and any other anti-gun members to vote on this treaty. The special session will be held in the middle of the night on a holiday weekend when Congress is all but closed down. Think December 23 or 24 of this year.
Democrats are salivating at the prospect of a disarmed population. Disarmed of course means the law-abiding are disarmed while the criminals still find ways to get guns.
Democrats also want more legalized marijuana and medical marijuana. A stoned population will tend to vote for the “kewl” Democrats who the “kewl” Hollywood actors are supporting like George Cloony, it don’t get any hipper than that.
Stoned and disarmed and sucking off the Gov’t tit is how Democrats want you to go through life
Well Homeland Security, Holder etc. plus the new help from UN are all gearing up to stop that eventuality. Maybe the last hope is military wises up and takes charge. Where is Al Haig when his country needs him?
Thanks for the list. Lugar was for it and we saw where that got him...
Depends on how many Lugar's there are after the election. I predict LOST will be ratified.
They’ll use Y2K as an excuse to declare Marshall Law and take all are guns.
Maybe not Laz, but it is short sighted to not see that these vermin want to reduce the world population, and I don't think they care how it is done.
Materialistic loons think you are no different than a tree, only less valuable. Have we not seen this enough times in history to believe that they will do it again?
Not really it takes one of these to do that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.