Skip to comments.Please do not post from "Ulsterman"
Posted on 07/22/2012 7:49:04 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
The originator of that site is Anthony G. Martin, who threaten to sue individual freepers. He was zotted as a result.
click here for more info
Did not know this.
Thanks for the “heads-up”.
Unfortunately, what used to be fiction actually seems to become reality.
I LOVE Vince Foster. And yes, I am in love w/ his "fictional" character Mitch Rapp. However, Vince writes his novel series based on actual real people and facts. Does Mitch Rapp exist? Perhaps only in my dreams (really really good dreams, hehehe).
I have been following the Ulsterman report for quite some time now. His insider said something big was about to occur that just might bring down the ILLEGAL admin. we have now. Then boom, Fast & Furious hits.
It seems the world has been turned upside down. No one knows WHO to believe anymore and thus, any kind of trust has been thrown out the window.
We the people have had SO much shoved down our throat and up our butts, in too quick of a time, I believe we might be too quick to attack.....even an innocent.
We are now living in strange times. Perhaps that is what He meant when He said Matthew 10:21-23.
If you start at the beginning of the ulsterman posts of the white house insider you will discover that a lot of what they say is hardly fiction yet very well documented.But then of course you would have to read it first.
You would not be alone in your belief.
Didn’t see much in the examples regarding falsehoods of the Washington Insider....
Yeah, but if he is inventing named sources, what does that say about the veracity of his unnamed source?
You mean I’m sitting here with a pair of lizards
with their lips and eyes sewed shut.....for nothing?
Ulsterman? Sounds like an anti-Catholic to me!
Perhaps he is the insider himself? You can't only read the Ulsterman report....you must also read the comments.
There are very talented people who figure out and post links to what the "insider/s" is trying to say, without saying it. Kind of like a bread trail. Sometimes, they come right out and say it, sometimes just clues.
The comments after the Ulsterman report, to me, are most important. They connect the dots.
barry...."the one who calls himself Barack" has a longer "dead now" trail than the clintons.
This would have been “fiction” once upon a time.
For what? Discussion about an unnamed source via an unhinged blogger? Anthony Martin re-invents the term 'legend in his own mind' - just to get blog hits. The truth about Obama is bad enough, no need to invent stories unless you have your own motivations for such - such as generating blog traffic.
The Ellison story has something the Ulsterman content doesn’t - it can be verified. So nice try at moral equivalence, but it didn’t quite cut it./
The problem with that link is that it is from 2010 and way out-of-date.
I’m about as skeptical as they come, and I take Ulsterman’s Insider interviews with both a grain of salt and some real concern.
However . . .
Over the months, he has just posted too many things weeks before they happen. Over and again. I don’t know who the guy is or who he’s talking to, but he has been repeatedly right, to the point that I think it’s a mistake to dismiss what he publishes.
If JR says not to post Ulsterman stuff here, then let’s be respectful and don’t. But nobody tells me what not to read. Just bookmark the forbidden site and check in on your own occasionally. No matter what the PTB here say.
Just keep an open mind and question everything.
Fiction? Maybe, but much of the science fiction I read in high school is now fact. Some of what YOU wrote about as fiction is transitioning into fact also.
The scare we lived through over Y2K was ficticious and I took more than my share of ridicule for preparing for a disaster that never came... but I’m still glad I bought all that stuff. It’s come in handy on more than one occasion.
So I’ll read the Ulsterman Report whenever I get the chance, make whatever preparations I think I need and - hopefully - get laughed out of the room when it’s all over.
Remember, ‘Pray for the best but prepare for the worst.’
Curtains open....Fast & Furious. How the heck did these insiders know of what was coming before hand?
Remember CA. The “barry guy” who was found dead weeks after he “disappeared” after going against barrys nom?
My memory for names is terrible, but I believe it was Boxer who had ALL her political cash “stolen” after “barry guy” disappeared? Isn't she the one who announced bin ladens death before barry did? Which she announced at an apparent eulogy for this once “barry guy”?
“We don't know who, what, or where......” sounded more like a threat than a eulogy.
I think you mean Sen. Dianne Feinstein, not Sen. Barbara Boxer.
I think you mean Sen. Dianne Feinstein, not Sen. Barbara Boxer.
I disagree, I've seen plenty of evidence proving he is.
And once again, we don't need fiction writing to make Obama into a monster. His own documented actions suffice.
Thank you for the correction. I should have researched before posting.
There was 1 woman who took the fall. Funny how that dropped out of the “news” so quickly.
It’s almost as bad as that Orange County something-or-other blog. Can’t even think of the spammer’s name right now.
And a thoroughly-entertaining, brutally-mocking thread it was, too.
Hey, Rathergate was back in 2004. Should we no longer judge Dan on his falsehoods from back then?
Where I come from, once you're caught making up facts, you have a long, long way to go to get your veracity back.
You are correct in your last sentence. However; those of us who follow the Ulsterman report knew something big was coming down. We just didn't know what it was.
Now we know.
You left out "blathering."
Good to know his ‘interview’ with a military person was fiction.
McCarthy. Remember him? They tried to make him look like a tinfoil kook.
Now look at our politians and hollyweird and tell me he was wrong all along.
I think you are giving Ulsterman too much credit. One can always make vague predictions that someone bad is about to happen - and with Obama there basically there is a steady stream of bad news and events. The same kind of thing happens with those who predict earthquakes - every now and then, they get a big one right by happenstance, and when they don't, they point to a nearby small earthquake to support their claim of accuracy.
But small earthquakes happen quite often in earthquake zones.
My link in post 23 provides documentation where Ulsterman made up sources.
Once someone is caught pulling stories out of their arse, it is a very tough sell to me for them to have any veracity going forward.
Apparently, you feel otherwise, so we'll have to leave it at that.
Oh good grief. The man was talking from a teleprompter, not speaking from his heart. Ugh, the phony.
But with views in the hundreds, 1.6 hundreds I think, how did FR stand the onslaught of his defenders’ wrath?
BTW, did you watch a “B” movie last night?
You obviously didn’t read the report.
That’s fine. I didn’t give any detail, I just remember it. It had to do w/ the 2nd amendment.
I don’t believe in coincidences. This Batman shooting 1 week away from a UN small arms vote, or whatever the heck they call it?
Coincidence? I think not.
And I wonder how many of those views are from it being linked on FR today?
No way to tell, but the single comment on the vid is “Zot.” [trying really hard not to laugh]
Care to list a few.
Thanks for the info.
All articles written by freepers, published by Pravda, posted by freepers...on Free Republic.
So if Pravda is banned, it seems to be more of a suggestion than a rule.
You write excellent fiction.
Sadly, many readers cannot tell the difference nowadays between fact and fiction, or if the writer is faking either.
We are becoming an illiterate nation.
No. I’ve got other things to do.
The Insider reports are readily available, dated, and you can find and read them easily by going to U’s site or just google.
Um, I believe you mean Vince Flynn?
Vince Foster is no longer available or in any condition to write about "fictional" assassins. On the other hand, if he were, he could no doubt write a doozy of a book about a real assassin and unsolved murder mystery, er, I mean "suicide"...
ever heard of him?
It’s still sleazy to write FICTION and try to gain an edge by promoting it as FACT.
IT’s a low, sleazy, lying trick. Fiction is honorable, I have written four novels that I hope people read with great seriousness.
But I would never write some BS fiction, and tell people it’s the truth to make them believe it.
Don’t you understand the difference?
You guys are being played. Duped. Good fiction is good stuff. I write it, I read it.
But it’s a sleazy, low, underhanded trick to try to gain traction for one’s FICTION by claiming it’s a fact.
BTW, I wrote “Enemies Foreign And Domestic” before 2003, and it used a false-flag “assault weapon massacre” in a stadium on page one. It’s been compared to both Fast and Furious and the Movie Massacre. Does that mean I’m a damn prophet? Hell no. It means I’m a NOVELIST who projects a few events ahead. Plenty of NOVELISTS do the same thing.
But I would NEVER write fiction and peddle it as FACT. That is the SLEAZY trick the “Ulsterman” pulls.
(But you probably believe the “Teachings of Don Juan” by Carlos Casteneda is the truth and not fiction, so what’s the use of discussing it with you?)
Thanks, and amen.
Going for Department of Redundancy Department, I see, but I repeat myself.
I just went to the Ulsterman site and read about how much Obama enjoys watching drone snuff films.
I couldn't finish the article...it's so obviously one person awkwardly trying to be 2 people so he could conduct an “interview”. Their little fake verbal battles are a poorly contrived narrative device. The “insiders” persona is a cartoonish character. And he didn't say anything that wasn't common knowledge.
Yep. PT Barnum was correct about never going broke underestimating the IQs of the dumb masses.
For instance, you wouldn't claim that MacDonald wrote your unauthorized biography. OTOH, clearly you enjoy boats.